CORE-OM

CORE-OM[1][2] (Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure),[3] is a common self-report measure of global distress, suitable for use as an initial screening tool and for assessing the response to psychological therapy.[4][5][6] The measure has 34 items all answered on the same five level frequency scale asking about the respondent's state over the last week. It was originally designed and developed in response to a research funding call from the UK Mental Health Foundation which required that the content must cover domains of well-being, problems, functioning and risk. These were seen as content domains, not as cleanly separable latent variables or factors, it was never envisaged that such a broad set of issues would show any neat population structure that would emerge in factor analysis.

References
  1. Evans, Chris; Connell, Janice; Barkham, Michael; Margison, Frank; McGrath, Graeme; Mellor-Clark, John; Audin, Kerry (2000). "CORE: Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation". Journal of Mental Health. 9 (3): 247–255. doi:10.1080/jmh.9.3.247.255. ISSN 0963-8237.
  2. Evans, Chris; Connell, Janice; Barkham, Michael; Margison, Frank; McGrath, Graeme; Mellor-Clark, John; Audin, Kerry (2002). "Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE–OM". British Journal of Psychiatry. 180 (1): 51–60. doi:10.1192/bjp.180.1.51. ISSN 0007-1250. PMID 11772852.
  3. Campbell, Megan Michelle (2013). The Adaptation of the 'Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure' (CORE-OM) from English Into a Valid Xhosa Measure of Distress. Rhodes University.
  4. Lindsay, Colin; Greve, Bent; Cabras, Ignazio; Ellison, Nick; Kellett, Stephen (2015). New Perspectives on Health, Disability, Welfare and the Labour Market. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 108–114. ISBN 9781119145516.
  5. "Trust Psychological Therapies Committee" (PDF). South London and Maudsley Trust.
  6. McHugh, R. Kathryn; Barlow, David H. (2012-04-15). Dissemination and Implementation of Evidence-Based Psychological Interventions. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199874866.
  7. "Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International — CC BY-NC-ND 4.0". creativecommons.org. Retrieved 2020-01-15.
  8. "CORE and CORE System Trust (CST) – CST supports the free but copyright CORE instruments". www.coresystemtrust.org.uk. Retrieved 2020-01-15.
  9. "Translations – CORE and CORE System Trust (CST)". www.coresystemtrust.org.uk. Retrieved 2020-01-15.
  10. Evans, Chris; Connell, Janice; Audin, Kerry; Sinclair, Alice; Barkham, Michael (May 2005). "Rationale and development of a general population well-being measure: Psychometric status of the GP-CORE in a student sample". British Journal of Guidance & Counselling. 33 (2): 153–173. doi:10.1080/03069880500132581. ISSN 0306-9885.
  11. Barkham, Michael; Bewick, Bridgette; Mullin, Tracy; Gilbody, Simon; Connell, Janice; Cahill, Jane; Mellor-Clark, John; Richards, David; Unsworth, Gisela; Evans, Chris (March 2013). "The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies". Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 13 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1080/14733145.2012.729069. ISSN 1473-3145.
  12. Twigg, Elspeth; Barkham, Michael; Bewick, Bridgette M.; Mulhern, Brendan; Connell, Janice; Cooper, Mick (September 2009). "The Young Person's CORE: Development of a brief outcome measure for young people". Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 9 (3): 160–168. doi:10.1080/14733140902979722. ISSN 1473-3145.
  13. Twigg, Elspeth; Cooper, Mick; Evans, Chris; Freire, Elizabeth; Mellor-Clark, John; McInnes, Barry; Barkham, Michael (May 2016). "Acceptability, reliability, referential distributions and sensitivity to change in the Young Person's Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (YP-CORE) outcome measure: replication and refinement" (PDF). Child and Adolescent Mental Health. 21 (2): 115–123. doi:10.1111/camh.12128.
  14. "YP-CORE information – CORE and CORE System Trust (CST)". coresystemtrust.org.uk. Retrieved 2020-01-15.
  15. "LD-CORE information – CORE and CORE System Trust (CST)". www.coresystemtrust.org.uk. Retrieved 2020-01-15.
  16. Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia; Brazier, John E.; Young, Tracey A.; Barkham, Michael (2011). "Using Rasch analysis to form plausible health states amenable to valuation: the development of CORE-6D from a measure of common mental health problems (CORE-OM)". Quality of Life Research. 20 (3): 321–333. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9768-4. Archived from the original on 5 April 2011. Retrieved 2020-07-30.
  17. Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia; Brazier, John E.; Rowen, Donna, Donna; Barkham, Michael (2012). "Estimating a Preference-Based Index from the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM): valuation of CORE-6D". Medical Decision Making. 20: 321–333. doi:10.1177/0272989X12464431. PMC 4107796.
  18. Evans, Chris; Sabucedo, Pablo; Paz, Clara (2020-06-12). "Supporting practice based evidence in the COVID-19 crisis: three researcher-practitioners' stories". Counselling Psychology Quarterly: 1–9. doi:10.1080/09515070.2020.1779661. eISSN 1469-3674. ISSN 0951-5070. Retrieved 2020-06-14.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.