Buzen's algorithm

In queueing theory, a discipline within the mathematical theory of probability, Buzen's algorithm (or convolution algorithm) is an algorithm for calculating the normalization constant G(N) in the Gordon–Newell theorem. This method was first proposed by Jeffrey P. Buzen in 1973.[1] Computing G(N) is required to compute the stationary probability distribution of a closed queueing network.[2]

Performing a naïve computation of the normalising constant requires enumeration of all states. For a system with N jobs and M states there are states. Buzen's algorithm "computes G(1), G(2), ..., G(N) using a total of NM multiplications and NM additions." This is a significant improvement and allows for computations to be performed with much larger networks.[1]

Problem setup

Consider a closed queueing network with M service facilities and N circulating customers. Write ni(t) for the number of customers present at the ith facility at time t, such that . We assume that the service time for a customer at the ith facility is given by an exponentially distributed random variable with parameter μi and that after completing service at the ith facility a customer will proceed to the jth facility with probability pij.[2]

It follows from the Gordon–Newell theorem that the equilibrium distribution of this model is

where the Xi are found by solving

and G(N) is a normalizing constant chosen that the above probabilities sum to 1.[1]

Buzen's algorithm is an efficient method to compute G(N).[1]

Algorithm description

Write g(N,M) for the normalising constant of a closed queueing network with N circulating customers and M service stations. The algorithm starts by noting solving the above relations for the Xi and then setting starting conditions[1]

The recurrence relation[1]

is used to compute a grid of values. The sought for value G(N) = g(N,M).[1]

Marginal distributions, expected number of customers

The coefficients g(n,m), computed using Buzen's algorithm, can also be used to compute marginal distributions and expected number of customers at each node.

the expected number of customers at facility i by

Implementation

It will be assumed that the Xm have been computed by solving the relevant equations and are available as an input to our routine. Although g is in principle a two dimensional matrix, it can be computed in a column by column fashion starting from the leftmost column. The routine uses a single column vector C to represent the current column of g.

C[0] := 1
for n := 1 step 1 until N do
   C[n] := 0;

for m := 1 step 1 until M do
for n := 1 step 1 until N do
   C[n] := C[n] + X[m]*C[n-1];

At completion, C contains the desired values G(0), G(1) to G(N). [1]

gollark: I don't think that would work:- people would *obviously* try and represent themselves as cooperative when they aren't- just having 150 representatives a level probably won't help because you are not communicating with these people outside of... representative duties
gollark: That means you still need to work out resource allocation/conflict resolution for the larger-scale things.
gollark: Anyway. People can probably work together in self-organizing small groups using social mechanisms, sure. *But* you're limited to Dunbar's number - about 150 people - and larger scale coordination than that is necessary.
gollark: I don't really know our family income so I can't compare that against the countrywide distribution.
gollark: Eh, upper middle maybe.

References

  1. Buzen, J. P. (1973). "Computational algorithms for closed queueing networks with exponential servers" (PDF). Communications of the ACM. 16 (9): 527. doi:10.1145/362342.362345.
  2. Gordon, W. J.; Newell, G. F. (1967). "Closed Queuing Systems with Exponential Servers". Operations Research. 15 (2): 254. doi:10.1287/opre.15.2.254. JSTOR 168557.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.