Buckhurst Hill West (ward)
Buckhurst Hill West is an electoral ward in Epping Forest, UK and is one of two wards that represent Buckhurst Hill.
Buskhurst Hill West has three seats in the District Council:
- Seat 1: last vote 2006 / 2010 next vote
- Seat 2: last vote 2003 / 2007 next vote
- Seat 3: last vote 2004 / 2008 next vote
2006 Local Election
Seat 1
Party | Candidates | Votes | % | % +/- | Elected | |
Liberal Democrats | Ann Haigh | 1,066 | 51.4 | -0.3 | Yes | |
Conservative Party | Haluk Ulkun | 1,009 | 48.6 | +0.3 | ||
Lib Dem Hold | 2.8% | |||||
Turnout: 42.74% | ||||||
Swing from Lib Dem to Conservative of 0.3% |
Seat 3 (early election)
Party | Candidates | Votes | % | % +/- | Elected | |
Conservative Party | Robert Church | 1,015 | 51.1 | +2.8 | Yes | |
Liberal Democrats | Carol Taylor | 970 | 48.9 | -2.8 | ||
Conservative Gain | 2.2% | |||||
Turnout: 42.74% | ||||||
Swing from Lib Dem to Conservative of 2.8% |
2004 Local Election: Seat 3
Party | Candidates | Votes | % | % +/- | Elected | |
Liberal Democrats | Michael Heavens | 1049 | 51.7 | -4.2 | Yes | |
Conservative Party | Haluk Ulkun | 981 | 48.3 | +4.2 | ||
Lib Dem Hold | 3.4% | |||||
Turnout: 41.2% | ||||||
Swing from Lib Dem to Conservative of 4.2% |
2003 Local Election: Seat 2
Party | Candidates | Votes | % | % +/- | Elected | |
Liberal Democrats | Robert Goold | 803 | 55.8 | Yes | ||
Conservative Party | Haluk Ulkun | 635 | 44.2 | |||
Lib Dem Win | 11.6% | |||||
Turnout: 29.6% |
gollark: It isn't simple. Rendering code for it is gigantic.
gollark: This is why we should replace inconsistent and hard to render maths notation with glorious S-expressions.
gollark: ... what even
gollark: There was some nice elegant explanation I forgot. IIRC it's something to do with the derivative of e^x being equal to itself.
gollark: I assume you're doing binomial distributions if whatever A-level spec you do is similar to mine, which it probably is, in which case I don't think they cover anything more advanced than trial and error/look at a table for that. Although it's probably <=/>= instead of = 0.02, as there's no guarantee that there is any x satisfying the = version.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.