Brown v British Abrasive Wheel Co

Brown v British Abrasive Wheel Co [1919] 1 Ch 290 is a UK company law case, concerning the validity of an alteration to a company's constitution, which adversely affect the interests of one of the shareholders.

Facts

British Abrasive Wheel Co needed to raise further capital. The 98% majority were willing to provide this capital if they could buy up the 2% minority. Having failed to effect this buying agreement, the 98% purposed to change the articles of association to give them the power to purchase the shares of the minority. The proposed article provided for the compulsory purchase of the minority’s shares on certain terms. However, the majority were prepared to insert a provision regarding price which stated that the minority would get a price which the court thought was fair.

Judgment

Astbury J held that the alteration was not for the benefit of the company as a whole and could not be made. One reason for this was that there was no direct link between the provision of the extra capital and the alteration of the articles. Although the whole scheme had been to provide the capital after removing the dissenting shareholders, it would in fact have been possible to remove the shareholders and then refuse to provide the capital.

gollark: Wasn't there some APIONET meta channel on APIONET?
gollark: https://suricrasia.online/iceberg/
gollark: Maybe you should send them ideatically instead.
gollark: Too bad.
gollark: ```Redeem this coupon at participating GTech™ apiary sites for one (3) trillion apioform!untrusted comment: signature from minisign secret keyRWTh5FGDfmGcoBq4xHJJZ4kYjXM+obY9R0D5xeO6d68XJBznSwBvRDGjo62EMOwyH+RWdjuc+kNI29QNuGvf3V6AnqruYcyYhg0=trusted comment: timestamp:1618137398 file:coupon.txtQuyruJGkjpRe76sv0Osb3kLhk8mQzP/zNNwaTr6zXWRQjONVijPL42buZfr7fc+3g/tGZoyRx7NwtGQbmtlcBw==```

See also

Notes
    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.