Brand protection

Brand protection is the process and set of actions that a right holder undertakes to prevent third parties from using its intellectual property without permission, as this may cause loss of revenue and, usually more importantly, destroys brand equity, reputation and trust. Brand protection seeks primarily to ensure that trademarks, patents, and copyrights are respected, though other intellectual property rights such as industrial design rights or trade dress can be involved.[1] Counterfeiting is the umbrella term to designate infringements to intellectual property, with the exception of the term piracy which is sometimes (colloquially) used to refer to copyright infringement.[2]

A more narrow definition of brand protection which focuses on trademark infringement, is sometimes used.[3][4] Counterfeiting of physical goods that  involves trademark infringement is indeed one of the predominant forms of intellectual property infringement.[5]. However, both copyright and patent infringement are possible without an associated trademark infringement, and both may result in loss of revenue and of brand equity. Eliminating diversion, gray market, or product theft and resale, are generally considered as well as part of a brand protection strategy, even though an intellectual property may not be necessarily infringed.[6]

Organisational measures

Registration and management of intellectual property is considered a pre-requisite to launching a brand protection strategy. Effective brand protection measures generally involve implementing prevention processes, monitoring processes, and reaction processes.[7] Internally, the anti-counterfeiting unit will report to top management, develop the brand protection processes, and collaborate closely with the relevant functions for each region and business unit. It will organise training and promote a culture of managing sensitive information carefully with external stakeholders. internally and externally.

For large organisations, an effective brand protection strategy requires collaboration and cooperation   between departments, functions, and geographies, as well as with external stakeholders such as customs, law  enforcement agencies, governments, industry partners including competitors, retailers and online marketplaces, and suppliers.[8][7] It requires training of personnel and the development of a company culture of managing sensitive information carefully, both internally and externally.  It can however be difficult to secure sufficient budget and resources as losses due to intellectual property infringement are difficult to quantify.[9][10] Methods exist to quantify the return on investment of elements of a brand protection strategy such as the use of product authentication systems, yet organisations must first acknowledge the existence and significance of the problem[11][7].

A cross-industry benchmark was made with the person in charge of anti-counterfeiting of 45 companies with global market presence[7]. The two organisational measures that were judged as most effective are those that help with the integrity of the supply chain, and those that contribute to securing distribution channels.

Technical measures

Counterfeit detection
Overt authentication with a security hologram

ISO standard 12931 provides guidelines and performance criteria to help brand owners define the particular authentication elements for either the packaging or material good itself, based on a counterfeiting risk analysis[12]. Overt security feature, such as a security hologram or optically variable ink, can be verified by an untrained user with human senses (typically by eyesight). Covert security features are verified with an off-the-shelf or purpose-built authentication tool. Both covert and overt security features may also go through the use of specialised equipment by a skilled expert. Overt security features have been criticised for their ineffectiveness,[13] but others argue that they can be "extremely difficult to replicate".[14]

Covert security features used to be verifiable by very few people, and consumers were unaware of their presence.[15] However, according to the ISO standard 12931, a smartphone is technically equivalent to an off-the-shelf covert authentication tool, yet it is a mass-market device which opens authentication on a large scale. [16] Furthermore, it can support overt security authentication by providing the instructions, after a QR Code scan, to visually verify an overt authentication element.[17]

According to the ISO standard 12931, track and trace solutions alone, e.g. a serialised 2D barcode placed on each product, is not authentication. QR Codes have indeed no protection against exact copy, unless additional techniques are used in combination.[16] A number of techniques exist, such as digital watermarks and secure graphics which are added into QR Codes to make them robust against copy, and an app can be used to authenticate.[18]

Consumer engagement and distribution channels monitoring

Distributed channels can be monitored, and illicit activity detected, from the analysis of the data generated from the QR Code scans.[19] Consumers can be incentivised to scan QR Codes or NFC tags on products, not necessarily for the primary purpose of verifying authenticity, but to obtain relevant information about the product or to engage in a loyalty program.[20][21] The large quantity of data collected from the scans allows to monitor distribution channels without the need for hiring investigators, and on a much larger scale. Consumers may actually demand the ability to verify that the product is authentic, and this creates an opportunity to engage with the brand.[22]

Online monitoring

With the growth of e-commerce, brand protection activities need to increasingly take place online. Online brand protection software monitor the Internet and help identify the Web sites that are likely to sell counterfeit, propose grey market goods or misuse the brand and its attributes.[7]

gollark: I used an orbital mind control laser in reverse mode.
gollark: 2024.
gollark: And schools spend time on "fractions" even though these are obviously just a commutative ring.
gollark: I agree. At most, you should use three numbers: 0, 1 and infinity, which isn't actually a number.
gollark: MANY things are beeoids, but this is not very useful.

References
  1. "Trade Dress Watch: A case for counterfeit trade dress | | Insights | DLA Piper Global Law Firm". DLA Piper. Retrieved 2020-05-02.
  2. "IP enforcement: asserting your rights | European IP Helpdesk". www.iprhelpdesk.eu. Retrieved 2020-05-02.
  3. "BRAND PROTECTION | meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary". dictionary.cambridge.org. Retrieved 2020-05-02.
  4. Fairley, Michael; Plimmer, Jeremy (2019). Encyclopedia of Brand Protection and Security Printing Technology. Tarsus Exhibitions & Publishing Ltd. ISBN 978-1910507209.
  5. Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods: Mapping the Economic Impact. www.oecd-ilibrary.org. Illicit Trade. 2016. doi:10.1787/9789264252653-en. ISBN 9789264252646. Retrieved 2020-05-03.
  6. "PROTECTING BRANDS AGAINSTTHE GRAY MARKET | On Publishing". Retrieved 2020-05-03.
  7. Staake, Thorsten. (2010). Countering counterfeit trade : illicit market insights, best-practice strategies, and management toolbox. Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-09562-7. OCLC 1132506670.
  8. "Anti-Counterfeiting & Brand Protection". 2018 Health for Humanity Report. 2019-05-03. Retrieved 2020-05-03.
  9. "How to combat counterfeiting | World Trademark Review". www.worldtrademarkreview.com. Retrieved 2020-05-03.
  10. Office, U. S. Government Accountability (2010-04-12). "Intellectual Property: Observations on Efforts to Quantify the Economic Effects of Counterfeit and Pirated Goods" (GAO-10-423). Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  11. Hopkins, David M., 1941- (2003). Counterfeiting exposed : protecting your brand and customers. J. Wiley & Sons. OCLC 1028576783.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. 14:00-17:00. "ISO 12931:2012". ISO. Retrieved 2020-05-03.CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  13. Graham, Marty (2007-02-07). "Fake Holograms a 3-D Crime Wave". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 2020-05-04.
  14. "How holograms can stop counterfeiting". Packaging Digest. 2008-07-31. Retrieved 2020-05-04.
  15. Hopkins, David M., 1941- (2003). Counterfeiting exposed : protecting your brand and customers. Kontnik, Lewis T., Turnage, Mark T. Hoboken, N.J.: J. Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-26990-5. OCLC 51476792.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. team, FPFIS (2016-01-07). "Survey of techniques for fight against counterfeit goods and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) infringing". EU Science Hub - European Commission. Retrieved 2020-05-04.
  17. "HP Mobile Authentication: How to detect fake products". The NewsMakers. 2013-06-18. Retrieved 2020-05-03.
  18. "Anti-counterfeiting Solutions". www.dupont.com. Retrieved 2020-05-04.
  19. Baldini, Gianmarco. Nai Fovino, Igor. Satta, Riccardo. Tsois, Aris. Checchi, Enrico. (2015). Survey of techniques for the fight against counterfeit goods and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) infringement. Publications Office. ISBN 978-92-79-54544-3. OCLC 948769474.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. "Behind Every Smart Product is Smart Packaging | Future Food Asia". futurefoodasia.com. Retrieved 2020-05-03.
  21. "Pernod to roll out smart bottles 'in coming weeks'". Retrieved 2020-05-03.
  22. "Lock and load: How closures makers are battling counterfeiters". Retrieved 2020-05-03.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.