Saddleback toad

The saddleback toads (Brachycephalus) are a genus of tiny toads and frogs in the family Brachycephalidae in the order Anura,[1][2] ranging from south Bahia to Santa Catarina in southeastern Brazil.[3] The genus includes two main groups, the often brightly coloured pumpkin toadlets, and the overall brown and more frog-like flea frogs (or flea toads), which once were placed in their own genus Psyllophryne.[4][5] Some pumpkin toadlets are toxic and their often bright colours are considered aposematic.[6][7] At about 1 cm (0.4 in) or less in snout–to–vent length, the flea frogs are some of the smallest frogs in the world.[4][8]

Saddleback toads
Spix's saddleback toad (Brachycephalus ephippium)
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Amphibia
Order: Anura
Family: Brachycephalidae
Genus: Brachycephalus
Fitzinger, 1826
Species
More than 35, see text
Distribution of Brachycephalus (in black)
Synonyms
  • Psyllophryne

The saddleback toads live among leaf litter in the Atlantic rainforest, ranging from near sea level to an altitude of 1,900 m (6,200 ft), with most species restricted to highland cloud forest.[9][10] They are mostly diurnal, feed on tiny invertebrates and breeding is by direct development, with eggs laid on land and hatching into young frogs (no tadpole stage).[11][12]

The majority of the Brachycephalus species have only been discovered in the 21st century. Most species have tiny ranges and are seriously threatened.[9]

Appearance

Morphology and size
B. pulex is one of the smallest species in the genus; with its frog-like appearance and overall brown colour it is a typical flea frog

The common name "saddleback toad" refers to the bony shields that cover their vertebrae,[1] but these are not present in all species in the genus and their function is unclear in the species that do have them.[13] The genus can be divided into two main subgroups: The pumpkin toadlets comprises most species in the genus. They have an overall toad-like appearance and morphology, and they mostly walk (they are unable to jump far). The second group are the flea frogs or flea toads (B. didactylus, B. hermogenesi, B. pulex and B. sulfuratus) that have an appearance and morphology that is more like leptodactylid frogs, and they are better jumpers.[8] The name "flea frog" is also sometimes used for the unrelated Adelophryne.[14] The skin of the saddleback toads can be rugose (bumpy) or smooth.[15] Their toes/fingers are reduced compared to most other frogs, with typically only two to four being clearly visible on each foot/hand.[1][15] Some of the bones in their skull are also reduced.[8]

Brachycephalus are very small frogs and adults range from 7.4 to 19.7 mm (0.29–0.78 in) in snout–to–vent length.[4][8] Females tend to be larger than males of the same species.[5][16] The flea frogs or flea toads are generally the smallest at 7.4–10.8 mm (0.29–0.43 in) in adults, but overlapping to some extent with the smallest species of pumpkin toadlets.[4][8] Adults of the pumpkin toadlets are at least 8.3 mm (0.33 in), with most species about 9.5–13.5 mm (0.37–0.53 in),[15][17] and the largest like B. darkside and B. margaritatus at least 14.8 mm (0.58 in).[18] At 8–8.4 mm (0.31–0.33 in), B. pulex has the smallest maximum adult size reported in the genus, while B. sulfuratus at 7.4–10.8 mm (0.29–0.43 in) has the smallest minimum adult size in the genus, but its maximum size surpasses that reported for a few others.[4][8][17] This makes them the smallest frogs in the Americas, with only the northeast Brazilian Adelophryne michelin, and Cuban Eleutherodactylus iberia and E. limbatus approaching their tiny dimensions. In other continents, the only similar-sized or slightly smaller frogs are a few species in the genera Mini, Paedophryne and Stumpffia.[14][19][20] Newly hatched saddleback toads are much smaller than the already tiny adults. For example, they are typically 5.25–5.45 mm (0.207–0.215 in) in B. ephippium,[12] a species where adults are at least 12.5 mm (0.49 in).[21]

Colour and toxicity

The different Brachycephalus vary greatly in colour and this is often useful for separating the species from each other.[15][22] Within each species, there are often also some individual variations, especially in the details of their pattern.[8][18][23][24]

The flea frogs or flea toads (B. didactylus, B. hermogenesi, B. pulex and B. sulfuratus) are well-camouflaged and overall brown, often with sections that are greyer or near-black, and sometimes with a few poorly-defined yellowish spots below.[4][8]

Among the remaining species in the genus, almost all have both underparts and upperparts that are at least partially yellow or orange.[15][18] They are collectively known as pumpkin toadlets,[8] which is a reference to the colour.[1] In some species, this colour is almost uniform throughout, earning them the name Brazilian gold frog (sometimes misapplied to the all-brown flea frog B. didactylus). However, in many species the yellow or orange is partial and incomplete. On the underparts, the yellow or orange may form a spotted or mottled pattern on a dull and dark background. On the upperparts, there can be spots, mottling or patches in black, brown, greenish, whitish or reddish. This results in some species where most but not all of the upperparts are yellow or orange and others where only small sections are yellow or orange.[15][18][25] Two particularly dull-coloured species, B. brunneus and B. curupira, are overall brown,[17] while a few others are essentially all-brown or greenish above (sometimes with whitish on the mid-back), limiting yellow or orange to the underparts.[15][18][26] In species where known, including ones that are bright orange-yellow as adults, the newly hatched juveniles are mostly brown overall and may have white markings below.[5][12][26]

The bright yellow, orange or reddish colours of many species in this genus are generally considered aposematic (warning colours),[7][15] but toxicity has only been studied in a few species. The brightly coloured B. ephippium and B. pernix have tetrodotoxin and similar toxins in their skin and organs, whereas B. nodoterga, which has a much more subdued colouring but still with some yellow-orange, appears to be non-toxic.[6][27] It is unknown how certain Brachycephalus species attain the strong neurotoxins, but they are possibly absorbed from the small invertebrates they eat, as known from some poison dart frogs and mantella frogs,[16][27] or produced by bacteria inside their body.[28]

At least two brightly coloured species, B. ephippium and B. pitanga, have bones that are fluorescent, which is visible through the skin of the toadlet when exposed to UV light.[7][29] It was initially speculated that the fluorescent colour also is aposematic or that it is related to mate choice (species recognition or determining fitness of a potential partner),[29] but later studies indicate that the former explanation is unlikely, as predation attempts on the toadlets appear to be unaffected by the presence/absence of fluorescence.[7]

Primary examples of colours and patterns in pumpkin toadlets
  • B. curupira (overall dull)
  • B. fuscolineatus (bright with dull sections above)
  • B. izecksohni (overall bright)
  • B. olivaceus (dull with bright markings below)
  • B. pitanga (fluorescence under UV-light)

Voice and hearing
Unique among all animals, B. pitanga and at least one other pumpkin toadlet species are deaf to their own advertising calls[30][31]

Although not very loud for a frog/toad (even relative to their tiny size),[30] Brachycephalus are most often located by their call.[28] The primary calls are by adult males, but females and young may also call.[24] A single square meter (slightly more than 10 sq ft) can host as many as five calling males,[30] and at a single location one may hear tens of males at once.[28] Males will defend their small territory from other males, but in most cases voice or visual displays are sufficient and fights are avoided.[12]

The advertising calls by males are performed either from a hidden or an exposed position.[3][15][30] Whether a species is dull or brightly coloured does not accurately predict if it prefers an exposed or hidden calling position.[28][32] In addition to advertising calls, there are aggressive calls directed towards other males when close.[3] The calls of the different species differ to various extent in frequency, speed, structure and other features.[28]

Peculiarly, at least the brightly coloured pumpkin toadlets B. ephippium and B. pitanga are unable to hear the frequency of their own advertising calls, as their ears are underdeveloped. Instead their communication appears to rely on certain movements like the vocal sac that inflates when calling, mouth gaping and waving of their arms.[30][31] It is speculated that their calling is a vestigiality from the ancestral form of the genus, whereas their reduced hearing ability (they do have some hearing ability in frequencies outside their call) is a novel change in these species. Sounds make them more vulnerable to predators, but there has likely been little direct evolutionary pressure to lose it because of their toxicity.[30][31] Unlike B. ephippium, B. pitanga and some others, many species in the genus always call from a hidden position, making any signalling by movements inefficient, and it is likely they can hear their own calls.[28] Direct studies of the medium-brightly coloured (mostly dull above, bright below) pumpkin toadlet B. actaeus and the dull-coloured flea frog B. hermogenesi strongly suggest that they are able to hear their own calls.[5][30]

Behavior
B. leopardus pair in amplexus

Saddleback toads live in the leaf litter on forest floors,[9] but on occasion may move to higher perches up to 1 m (3.3 ft) off the ground.[16] During dry conditions, both sexes tend to stay hidden in the leaf litter and there is little noticeable activity, but during the wet season and high humidity the males and in some species also females may move to the top of the leaf litter. In some species, they often take up quite conspicuous positions during this time.[3][24]

Overall the saddleback toads are mostly active during the day, but some activity also occurs during the night and some species possibly are mostly nocturnal.[16]

Breeding

In general, saddleback toads are reported to use axillary or nearly axillary amplexus where a male uses his front limbs to grab a female at her front limbs.[12][15] However, whereas most frogs typically only use one technique, at least B. ephippium will use two, beginning with an inguinal amplexus (where the male holds the female around the lower waist, just in front of her hindlimbs) and only later changing to a nearly axillary position.[12]

Based on the few species where the breeding behavior is known, the female saddleback toad lays about five or less yellow or yellow-white eggs, which are relatively large compared to the size of the adult. They are deposited in a hidden location (for example, under leaf litter or a tree log) on land.[5][12][21][33] The female rolls them until they are covered in particles, making them almost indistinguishable from the soil where they have been laid, but it may also help to preserve their water content.[12] After about two months, they hatch into juvenile toads/frogs. There is no tadpole or other aquatic stage.[12][34]

Feeding

Relatively little is known about the feeding behavior of saddleback toads, but they will take a wide range of minute invertebrates. They are known to feed on insects (among others, ants, springtails, true bugs, beetles, grasshoppers and flies) and their larvae, mites, spiders, pseudoscorpions, millipedes, snails and isopods.[11][16]

Conservation status
B. darkside (left) and B. quiririensis (right), two recently described species that, according to a review in 2019, are critically endangered[9]

Only 11 species of saddleback toads have been officially rated by the IUCN, all between 2004 and 2010, with 3 species listed as least concern (not threatened) and the remaining data deficient (insufficient data for rating them).[35] Since then, many new species have been recognised and more data has become available for evaluating their conservation status. In a review in 2019 that included all species recognised up until then and used IUCN's definitions, 10 species were data deficient, 5 least concern, 10 vulnerable, 5 endangered and 6 critically endangered.[9] Two of the data deficient species, B. atelopoide and B. bufonoides, have not been recorded since their original scientific descriptions a century ago and they are unknown in life.[9][36]

The three flea frogs B. didactylus, B. hermogenesi and B. sulfuratus and the pumpkin toadlet B. ephippiumsi are relatively widespread in both distribution and altitude range (lowlands to about 1,100–1,250 m [3,610–4,100 ft]), although it is possible that the last of these actually is a species complex.[9] Each of the remaining species of Brachycephalus are only known from seven or less locations and many at only one or two locations covering less than 1 km2 (0.4 sq mi) at a very narrow altitude range.[9] These are typically in cloud forest on sky island mountaintops and most species have completely separate distribution, isolated from each other by valleys and unsuitable habitat.[9][10] Where found, they can however be common, sometimes even abundant. Although some of the range-restricted species have well-protected distributions in reserves, many of the species do not.[9] Their small distributions make them highly vulnerable to habitat loss and degradation from climate change (changing temperature and rain patterns), fire, grazing by livestock, and deforestation for tree extraction and to make room for plantations, farming and cattle ranching.[9][10]

Classification and discovery

Family

Brachycephalus lacks a Bidder's organ, but were historically included in the true toad family Bufonidae, where one of the defining features is its presence.[1] Brachycephalus was subsequently placed in Atelopodidae or Brachycephalidae, with the latter being the generally accepted treatment in recent decades. Initially some authorities placed numerous genera in Brachycephalidae, while others limited it to only contain the genus Brachycephalus.[2] Genetic studies have shown that most of these genera belong in other families, but the—in morphology quite different—genus Ischnocnema is a close relative of Brachycephalus and they belong together as the only members of Brachycephalidae.[1][2]

Genus and species groups
Phylogenetic relationship of four pumpkin toadlet species showing that colours alone are not a good indicator of relatedness

Within Brachycephalus, there are two rather distinctive groups: the typical members are the pumpkin toadlets, while the remaining four species are the flea frogs or flea toads (B. didactylus, B. hermogenesi, B. pulex and B. sulfuratus).[4][5][8] Until 2002, the latter group, which is relatively widespread, was regarded as a separate genus, Psyllophryne, but it is now considered a synonym of Brachycephalus.[4][37][38] The pumpkin toadlets, which largely are restricted to highlands and foothills, can be further divided into two subgroups: the southern B. pernix subgroup (Paraná and Santa Catarina) and the northern B. ephippium subgroup (São Paulo and north).[3][9][39] Among the pumpkin toadlets, colours alone are not a good indicator of phylogenetic relationships. For example, the brown B. curupira is closely related to the golden B. izecksohni and the brown B. brunneus is closely related to the golden B. leopardus, but these species pairs are more distant from each other.[17]

Species
B. hermogenesi, one of the species initially placed in the flea frog genus Psyllophryne

The first species, Brachycephalus ephippium, was already described by Johann Baptist von Spix in 1824, but originally in the genus Bufo. Two years later the genus Brachycephalus was coined by Leopold Fitzinger. In 1920, four additional "variants" were described by Alípio de Miranda-Ribeiro, but in 1955 a review did not recognise them, arguing that they were synonyms of B. ephippium.[37] Another species, B. didactylus, was described in 1971 by Eugênio Izecksohn, but placed in its own genus Psyllophryne.[38] As a consequence, B. ephippium was the only widely recognised species in the genus; it was the pumpkin toadlet.[17] In 1990, B. nodoterga (one of the variants that had been described in 1920) was instated as a valid species, bringing the number of generally recognised Brachycephalus species to two.[40]

Starting in 1998, this changed dramatically. Since that year, there has been a couple of years at most between the description of new species and some years where several were described, peaking at eight species in 2015 alone.[15][23][37] Additionally, the three remaining variants that had been described in 1920 were instated as valid species in 2010 and the former Psyllophryne species were moved into Brachycephalus in 2002.[36][37][38] As of 2020, there were 36 recognised species of Brachycephalus.[37] The many recently discovered species have mostly been the result of scientists visiting isolated highland peaks, so-called sky islands that are separated from each other by valleys.[15][41] Although now generally recognised,[37] the distinction of some of these recently described species has been questioned by some authorities since they often have been separated mainly by colour and skin texture, features that can be variable in frogs/toads.[42]

List
Top to bottom: B. auroguttatus, B. coloratus, B. mariaeterezae and B. verrucosus are four of the thirteen species that were scientifically described from 2015 to 2017

According to Amphibian Species of the World, the following species are recognised in the genus Brachycephalus:[37]

gollark: There should just be free space beside roads.
gollark: ./warp choruscity
gollark: My town has THREE residents!
gollark: I could add that as a potatOS feature, perhaps, since it runs node.lua backgrounded.
gollark: Good, good.

References
  1. "Brachycephalidae". Berkeley, California: AmphibiaWeb. 2020. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  2. Hedges, S. B.; Duellman, W. E. & Heinicke, M. P. (2008). "New World direct-developing frogs (Anura: Terrarana): Molecular phylogeny, classification, biogeography, and conservation" (PDF). Zootaxa. 1737: 1–182. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.1737.1.1.
  3. Guimarães, Carla Silva; Luz, Sofia; Rocha, Pedro Carvalho; Feio, Renato Neves (2017). "The dark side of pumpkin toadlet: a new species of Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from Serra do Brigadeiro, southeastern Brazil". Zootaxa. Auckland, New Zealand: Magnolia Press. 4258 (4): 327–344. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4258.4.2. ISSN 1175-5334. PMID 28609910. Retrieved 1 May 2017.
  4. Napoli, M.F.; Caramaschi, U.; Cruz, C.A.G.; Dias, I.R. (2011). "A new species of flea-toad, genus Brachycephalus Fitzinger (Amphibia: Anura: Brachycephalidae), from the Atlantic rainforest of southern Bahia, Brazil". Zootaxa. 2739: 33–40. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.2739.1.3.
  5. Monteiro, J.P.D.C.; Condez, T.H.; Garcia, P.C.D.A.; Comitti, E.J.; Amaral, I.B.; Haddad, C.F.B. (2018). "A new species of Brachycephalus (Anura, Brachycephalidae) from the coast of Santa Catarina State, southern Atlantic Forest, Brazil". Zootaxa. 4407 (4): 483–505. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4407.4.2. PMID 29690168.
  6. Pires Jr., O.R.; A. Sebben; E.F. Schwartz; S.W. Largura; C. Bloch Jr.; R.A. Morales; C.A. Schwartz (2002). "Occurrence of tetrodotoxin and its analogues in the Brazilian frog Brachycephalus ephippium (Anura: Brachycephalidae)". Toxicon. 40 (6): 761–6. doi:10.1016/s0041-0101(01)00279-3. PMID 12175613.
  7. Rebouças, R.; A.B. Carollo; M.d.O. Freitas; C. Lambertini; R.M. Nogueira dos Santos; L.F. Toledo (2019). "Is the conspicuous dorsal coloration of the Atlantic forest pumpkin toadlets aposematic?". Salamandra. 55 (1): 39–47. doi:10.3390/d11090150.
  8. Condez, T.H.; Monteiro, J.P.D.; Comitti, E.J.; Garcia, P.C.A.; Amaral, I.B.; Haddad, C.F.B. (2016). "A new species of flea-toad (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from southern Atlantic Forest, Brazil". Zootaxa. 4083 (1): 40–56. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4083.1.2. PMID 27394218.
  9. Bornschein, M.R.; M.R. Pie; L. Teixeira (2019). "Conservation Status of Brachycephalus Toadlets (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest". Diversity. 11 (9): 150. doi:10.3390/d11090150.
  10. Bates, Mary (4 June 2015). "Seven New Mini-Frogs Found—Among Smallest Known". National Geographic News. Retrieved 11 February 2020.
  11. Fontoura, P.L.; L.F. Ribeiro; M.R. Pie. Haddad (2011). "Diet of Brachycephalus brunneus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) in the Atlantic Rainforest of Paraná, southern Brazil". Zoologia (Curitiba). 28 (5): 687–689. doi:10.1590/S1984-46702011000500019.
  12. Pombal, Jr., J.P.; I. Sazima; C.F.B. Haddad (1994). "Breeding Behavior of the Pumpkin Toadlet, Brachycephalus ephippium (Brachycephalidae)". Journal of Herpetology. 28 (4): 516–519. doi:10.2307/1564972. JSTOR 1564972.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. Campos, L.A..; H.R. da Silva; A. Sebben (2010). "Morphology and development of additional bony elements in the genus Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae)". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 99 (4): 752–767. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01375.x.
  14. Lourenço-de-Moraes, Ricardo; Dias, Iuri R.; Mira-Mendes, Caio V.; Oliveira, Renan M. de; Barth, Adriane; Ruas, Danilo S.; Vences, Miguel; Solé, Mirco; Bastos, Rogério P. & Lötters, Stefan (19 September 2018). "Diversity of miniaturized frogs of the genus Adelophryne (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae): A new species from the Atlantic Forest of northeast Brazil". PLOS ONE. 13 (9): e0201781. Bibcode:2018PLoSO..1301781L. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201781. PMC 6145526. PMID 30231059.
  15. Ribeiro, Luiz F.; Bornschein, Marcos R.; Belmonte-Lopes, Ricardo; Firkowski, Carina R.; Morato, Sergio A.A.; Pie, Marcio R. (2015). "Seven new microendemic species of Brachycephalus(Anura: Brachycephalidae) from southern Brazil". PeerJ. 3: e1011. doi:10.7717/peerj.1011. ISSN 2167-8359. PMC 4458131. PMID 26056613.
  16. Dorigo, T.A.; C.C. Siqueira; D. Vrcibradic; T. Maia-Carneiro; M. Almeida-Santos; C.F.D. Rocha (2012). "Ecological aspects of the pumpkin toadlet, Brachycephalus garbeanus Miranda-Ribeiro, 1920 (Anura: Neobatrachia: Brachycephalidae), in a highland forest of southeastern Brazil". Journal of Natural History. 46 (39–40): 2497–2507. doi:10.1080/00222933.2012.713525. S2CID 86664601.
  17. Ribeiro LF; Blackburn DC; Stanley EL; Pie MR; Bornschein MR (2017). "Two new species of the Brachycephalus pernix group (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from the state of Paraná, southern Brazil". PeerJ. 5: e3603. doi:10.7717/peerj.3603. PMID 28761788. S2CID 22414191.
  18. Pie, Marcio R.; Ribeiro, Luiz F.; Confetti, André E.; Nadaline, Mário J.; Bornschein, Marcos R. (2018-10-03). "A new species of Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from southern Brazil". PeerJ. 6: e5683. doi:10.7717/peerj.5683. ISSN 2167-8359. PMC 6174073. PMID 30310742.
  19. "10 Smallest Frogs and Toads in the World". gonefroggin.com. 18 December 2017. Retrieved 30 January 2020.
  20. Scherz, Mark D.; Hutter, Carl D.; Rakotoarison, Andolalao; Riemann, Jana C.; Rödel, Mark-Oliver; Ndriantsoa, Serge H.; Glos, Julian; Roberts, Sam Hyde; Crottini, Angelica; Vences, Miguel; Glaw, Frank (2019-03-27). "Morphological and ecological convergence at the lower size limit for vertebrates highlighted by five new miniaturised microhylid frog species from three different Madagascan genera". PLOS ONE. 14 (3): e0213314. Bibcode:2019PLoSO..1413314S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213314. PMC 6436692. PMID 30917162.
  21. "Brachycephalus ephippium". Berkeley, California: AmphibiaWeb. 2019. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
  22. Bornschein, M.R.; L.F. Ribeiro; L. Teixeira; M.R. Pie (2019). "New altitudinal record for Brachycephalus actaeus Monteiro, Condez, Garcia, Comitti, Amaral & Haddad, 2018 (Anura, Brachycephalidae), with comments on its habitats of occurrence". Check List. 15 (6): 1031–1036. doi:10.15560/15.6.1031.
  23. Pie, M.R.; L.F. Ribeiro (2015). "A new species of Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from the Quiriri mountain range of southern Brazil". PeerJ. 3 (1792): e1179. doi:10.7717/peerj.1179. PMC 4558078. PMID 26339556.
  24. Alves, A.C.R.; R.J. Sawaya; S.F. Dos Reis; C.F.B. Haddad (2009). "New Species of Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from the Atlantic Rain Forest in São Paulo State, Southeastern Brazil". Journal of Herpetology. 43 (2): 212–219. doi:10.1670/0022-1511-43.2.212. S2CID 86086374.
  25. Pombal, Jr, J.P.; E.M. Wistuba; M.R. Bornschein (1998). "A New Species of Brachycephalid (Anura) from the Atlantic Rain Forest of Brazil". Journal of Herpetology. 32 (1): 70–74. doi:10.2307/1565481. JSTOR 1565481.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  26. Bornschein, M.R.; L.F. Ribeiro; D,C. Blackburn; E.L. Stanley; M.R. Pie (2016). "A new species of Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) from Santa Catarina, southern Brazil". PeerJ. 4 (10): e2629. doi:10.7717/peerj.2629. PMID 27812425. S2CID 23294169.
  27. Pires, Jr., O.R.; A. Sebben; E.F. Schwartz; R.A.V. Morales; C. Bloch Jr.; C.A. Schwartz (2005). "Further report of the occurrence of tetrodotoxin and new analogues in the Anuran family Brachycephalidae". Toxicon. 45 (1): 73–79. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2004.09.016. PMID 15581685.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  28. Bornschein, M.R.; L.F. Ribeiro; M.M. Rollo Jr.; A.E. Confetti; M.R. Pie; et al. (2018). "Advertisement call of Brachycephalus albolineatus (Anura: Brachycephalidae)". PeerJ. 6: e5273. doi:10.7717/peerj.5273. PMID 30042895. S2CID 50776284.
  29. Sandra Goutte; Matthew J. Mason; Marta M. Antoniazzi; Carlos Jared; Didier Merle; Lilian Cazes; Luís Felipe Toledo; Hanane el-Hafci; Stéphane Pallu; Hugues Portier; Stefan Schramm; Pierre Gueriau; Mathieu Thoury (2019). "Intense bone fluorescence reveals hidden patterns in pumpkin toadlets". Scientific Reports. 9 (1): 5388. Bibcode:2019NatSR...9.5388G. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41959-8. PMC 6441030. PMID 30926879.
  30. Goutte, S.; et al. (2017). "Evidence of auditory insensitivity to vocalization frequencies in two frogs". Scientific Reports. 7: 12121. Bibcode:2017NatSR...712121G. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12145-5. PMID 28935936. S2CID 205604026.
  31. Supriya, L. (26 September 2017). "These tiny frogs can't hear their own mating songs". ScienceMag. Retrieved 9 February 2020.
  32. Verdade, V.K.; M.T. Rodrigues; J. Cassimiro; D. Pavan; N. Liou; M.C. Lange (2008). "Advertisement Call, Vocal Activity, and Geographic Distribution of Brachycephalus hermogenesi (Giaretta and Sawaya, 1998) (Anura, Brachycephalidae)". Journal of Herpetology. 42 (3): 542–549. doi:10.1670/07-287.1. S2CID 86638006.
  33. "Unidades de conservação reafirman sua importância para a biodiversidade". Infraestrutura e Meio Ambiente, Government of São Paulo state. 2018. Retrieved 9 February 2020.
  34. Zweifel, Richard G. (1998). Cogger, H.G.; Zweifel, R.G. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Reptiles and Amphibians. San Diego: Academic Press. p. 103. ISBN 0-12-178560-2.
  35. "Brachycephalus". IUCN Redlist. 2 February 2020. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  36. Pombal, J.P., Jr. (2010). "A posição taxonômica das "variedades" de Brachycephalus ephippium (Spix, 1824) descritas por Miranda-Ribeiro, 1920 (Amphibia, Anura, Brachycephalidae)". Zoologia (Curitiba). 526: 1–12.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  37. Frost, Darrel R. (2020). "Search for Taxon: Brachycephalus". Amphibian Species of the World, an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York. Retrieved 2 February 2020.
  38. Kaplan, M. (2002). "Histology of the anteroventral part of the breast-shoulder apparatus of Brachycephalus ephippium (Brachycephalidae) with comments on the validity of the genus Psyllophryne (Brachycephalidae)". Amphibia-Reptilia. 23 (2): 225–227.
  39. Bornschein, M.R.; et al. (2016). "Geographical and altitudinal distribution of Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae) endemic to the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest". PeerJ. 4: e2490. doi:10.7717/peerj.2490. PMC 5068354. PMID 27761312.
  40. Heyer, W.R.; A.S. Rand; C.A.G. Cruz; O.L. Peixoto; C.E. Nelson (1990). "Frogs of Boracéia". Arquivos de Zoologia. 31 (4): 231–410. doi:10.11606/issn.2176-7793.v31i4p231-410 (inactive 2020-07-30).
  41. Webb, Jonathan. "Seven tiny frog species found on seven mountains". BBCNews. BBCNews. Retrieved 4 June 2015.
  42. Condez, T.H.; J.P.d.C. Monteiro; C.F.B. Haddad (2017). "Comments on the current taxonomy of Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae)". Zootaxa. 4290 (2): 395–400. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4290.2.12.
  43. Garey, Michel V.; Lima, André M. X.; Hartmann, Marília T.; Haddad, Célio F. B. (2012). "A new species of miniaturized toadlet, genus Brachycephalus (Anura: Brachycephalidae), from southern Brazil". Herpetologica. 68 (2): 266–271. doi:10.1655/herpetologica-d-11-00074.1.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.