Bob Barrett (politician)

Robert "Bob" Barrett (born 1967) is a Minnesota politician and former member of the Minnesota House of Representatives. A member of the Republican Party of Minnesota, he represented District 32B, which included portions of Chisago County just north of the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Bob Barrett
Member of the Minnesota House of Representatives
from the 32B district
17B (2011–2013)
In office
January 4, 2011  January 2, 2017
Preceded byJeremy Kalin
Succeeded byAnne Neu
Personal details
Born1967 (age 5253)
Political partyRepublican Party of Minnesota
Spouse(s)Judi
Children2
ResidenceShafer, Minnesota[1]
Alma materMinnesota State University, Mankato
Occupationexecutive director

Early life, education, and career

Barrett graduated from Minnesota State University, Mankato in Mankato, receiving his B.A. in Accounting in 1989. Active in his community, he served on the Chisago Lakes School District Finance Team, and was also a school district mentor. He is a sports referee and umpire, officiating for basketball, football, baseball and softball games.[2][3] He is the Director of Market Research and Marketing Analysis for the Hazelden Foundation.[4]

Minnesota House of Representatives

Barrett was first elected to the House in 2010. He was re-elected in 2012 and 2014.

False campaign literature distribution and conviction

On February 5, 2013, Representative Barrett was fined $1000 for disseminating campaign literature that misrepresented the record of his opponent in the previous election. The Administrative Law Judge Panel concluded that the false information "likely had some impact on voters" in Barrett's 51%/49% victory. (Barrett) stated that his opponent “did not serve on the education committee even though our schools need help.” Barrett’s challenger Rick Olseen did sit on an education committee when he served as a state senator.[5][6]

Residency questions

In 2014, Barrett's residency in the district that he represented came into question. Evidence submitted included photos of the empty house and affidavits from neighbors claiming that Barrett indeed, was not observed as being a resident of the home in question. In August 2014 District Court Judge George Stephenson ruled that "Despite his own doubts" about Barrett's residency, that the evidence was insufficient. [7][8]

Again in 2016, Barrett's residency was brought before the same judge that had ruled in 2014 that Barrett's residency evidence was "insufficient". In early August, evidence collected from a group of advocates were administered into a formal complaint against Barrett and his claim of residency in his own district.

The Second Judicial District Judge George Stephenson found “clear and convincing evidence[9]” that Barrett didn’t live in House District 32B. His opinion questioned the legitimacy of Mr. Barrett's testimony, including the fact that Mr. Barrett did not establish "cable/satellite television, internet, trash pickup, or a washer and dryer" at his residence.[10] He also noted that among more than 30 visits, Barrett never was available at the home in question.[11] Mr. Barrett had rented from a campaign contributor the house in Taylor's Falls, MN for $300 a month, about 1/4 of which a rental property of the size and scale could be expected from a similar property in the area.[12]

The Minnesota Supreme Court heard an appeal on the ballot removal on September 6, 2016.[13] On September 9, 2016, the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the ruling removing Barrett from the November ballot. A special election will be held on Feb 14, 2017 for this seat. (Until then, the seat remains vacant during the start of the 2017 legislative session.) The Minnesota Republican Party must choose a candidate for that special election by Nov 15, 2016. This person must have resided in the district before Aug 14, 2016, 6 months before the special election. (This eliminates Bob Barrett, who the court has ruled does not live in the district.)

gollark: That might technically be the case, but it is not intended as one.
gollark: This is NOT true. I have not in any way been sponsored by pizza companies. There have been no advertising agreements whatsoever with any companies producing pizza or otherwise to have me subliminally advertise pizza, as my profile picture is not a pizza. Since it is not a pizza, this is obviously not pizza advertisement whatsoever. No monetary exchanges or otherwise have occurred with companies engaged in pizza production for any reason relating to my profile picture. You are clearly engaged in libel and attempting to discredit my non-pizza-advertising status. It is IN NO WAY subliminal pizza advertising because I DO NOT work for pizza companies in any form. It's not pizza. There were no deals, under-the-table or otherwise, with pizza companies. No pizza companies pay for any kind of subliminal advertising involving me. People make that mistake, but I am not working for pizza companies doing subliminal advertising; that is not in any way what I am doing. I am NOT being sponsored by ANY pizza companies to display subliminal pizza advertising OF ANY KIND.
gollark: Technically, I own the sun and will invoice heavy users.
gollark: As far as I know, no country technically has laws specifically about cognitohazards.
gollark: No, those are twisted-pair.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.