Besicovitch covering theorem

In mathematical analysis, a Besicovitch cover, named after Abram Samoilovitch Besicovitch, is an open cover of a subset E of the Euclidean space RN by balls such that each point of E is the center of some ball in the cover.

The Besicovitch covering theorem asserts that there exists a constant cN depending only on the dimension N with the following property:

  • Given any Besicovitch cover F of a bounded set E, there are cN subcollections of balls A1={Bn1}, …, AcN={BncN} contained in F such that each collection Ai consists of disjoint balls, and

Let G denote the subcollection of F consisting of all balls from the cN disjoint families A1,...,AcN. The less precise following statement is clearly true: every point xRN belongs to at most cN different balls from the subcollection G, and G remains a cover for E (every point yE belongs to at least one ball from the subcollection G). This property gives actually an equivalent form for the theorem (except for the value of the constant).

  • There exists a constant bN depending only on the dimension N with the following property: Given any Besicovitch cover F of a bounded set E, there is a subcollection G of F such that G is a cover of the set E and every point xE belongs to at most bN different balls from the subcover G.

In other words, the function SG equal to the sum of the indicator functions of the balls in G is larger than 1E and bounded on RN by the constant bN,

Application to maximal functions and maximal inequalities

Let μ be a Borel non-negative measure on RN, finite on compact subsets and let f be a μ-integrable function. Define the maximal function by setting for every x (using the convention )

This maximal function is lower semicontinuous, hence measurable. The following maximal inequality is satisfied for every λ>0:

Proof.

The set Eλ of the points x such that clearly admits a Besicovitch cover Fλ by balls B such that

For every bounded Borel subset E´ of Eλ, one can find a subcollection G extracted from Fλ that covers E´ and such that SG  bN, hence

which implies the inequality above.

When dealing with the Lebesgue measure on RN, it is more customary to use the easier (and older) Vitali covering lemma in order to derive the previous maximal inequality (with a different constant).

gollark: I really ought to make a feature which streams osmarks internet radio™ directly into arbitrary voice chats.
gollark: And used it subtly.
gollark: Maybe the people competent enough to do so already *did* obtain the token.
gollark: How unfathomable.
gollark: Why not?

See also

References

  • Besicovitch, A. S. (1945), "A general form of the covering principle and relative differentiation of additive functions, I", Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 41 (02): 103–110, doi:10.1017/S0305004100022453.
    • "A general form of the covering principle and relative differentiation of additive functions, II", Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 42: 205–235, 1946, doi:10.1017/s0305004100022660.
  • DiBenedetto, E (2002), Real analysis, Birkhäuser, ISBN 0-8176-4231-5.
  • Füredi, Z; Loeb, P.A. (1994), "On the best constant for the Besicovitch covering theorem", Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 121 (4): 1063–1073, doi:10.2307/2161215, JSTOR 2161215.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.