Berufsverbot

Berufsverbot is an order of "professional disqualification" under German law. Berufsverbot may be translated into English as "professional ban".

A Berufsverbot disqualifies the recipient from engaging in certain professions or activities on the grounds of their criminal record, political convictions or membership in a particular group.

The Berufsverbot in National Socialist Germany

Pursuant to a 1933 law (the Berufsbeamtengesetz), many Jews, artists, political opponents, and others were prohibited by the National Socialist government in Germany from engaging in certain professions.

Post-World War II Berufsverbot

After 1945, the allied authorities in West Germany issued Berufsverbot orders against certain political filmmakers, such as Leni Riefenstahl, who got a lifelong Berufsverbot.[1]

1972 Anti-Radical Decree

On 28 January 1972 the federal government and the premiers of the states instituted the so-called Radikalenerlass (Anti-Radical Decree). Under this decree, people who were considered to be a member or aligned to an extremist organization, were banned from work as civil servants (Beamter), which includes a variety of public sector occupations such as teaching. The decree was declared as response to terrorism by the Red Army Faction.

Berufsverbot is the common name for the decree by people who opposed it, because they claim it contradicts the freedom of occupational choice guaranteed by the Basic Law of Germany. Law experts do not use the term for these cases as the decree does not forbidthe occupation by itself.

The law was applied unevenly after 1979, and many of the states of Germany repealed the relevant legislation. The Landtag of Niedersachsen published a condemnation of the Berufsverbot practice.[2] Other states, like Bavaria, still apply the decree.

Treatment under Council of Europe law

In at least one case (Vogt v. Germany, 1995), the European Court of Human Rights found Germany in breach of its responsibilities to a citizen (Dorothea Vogt, a dismissed teacher who was an active member of the German Communist Party) under Article 10 (right to freedom of expression) and Article 11 (right to freedom of assembly and association) of the European Convention on Human Rights. The government subsequently settled with her, providing compensation for her time without full earnings, topping up her pension rights for that period, as well as other modest damages and costs.

gollark: >let ban = tango = piin ban go
gollark: Also, reliance on compiler magic.
gollark: The main problem with it is that it favours ability to read what the code does at a lower level over ability to actually understand the point of a bit of code at a higher level.
gollark: And bad.
gollark: Circles are magic.

See also

References
  1. Melching, Willem (2016). Waarom Duitsland?. Netherlands: Uitgeverij Prometheus. p. 68. ISBN 9789044630497.
  • Bulletin of the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany no. 15 of 3 February 1972, p. 142
  • Vogt v. Germany, European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Grand Chamber in Strasbourg, main judgement delivered 2 September 1995. Case number 7/1994/454/535. Application number 17851/91.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.