Beeston (UK Parliament constituency)
Beeston was a parliamentary constituency in Nottinghamshire which returned one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
Beeston | |
---|---|
Former Borough constituency for the House of Commons | |
County | Nottinghamshire |
1974–1983 | |
Number of members | One |
Replaced by | Broxtowe and Ashfield[1] |
Created from | Rushcliffe |
It was created for the February 1974 general election from part of the Rushcliffe constituency, and abolished for the 1983 general election.
Boundaries
The Urban Districts of Beeston and Stapleford, and Eastwood, and in the Rural District of Basford the parishes of Awsworth, Brinsley, Cossall, Greasley, Kimberley, Nuthall, Strelley, and Trowell.
Members of Parliament
Election | Member | Party | |
---|---|---|---|
Feb 1974 | Jim Lester | Conservative | |
1983 | constituency abolished |
Elections
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Jim Lester | 33,273 | 52.6 | +16.6 | |
Labour | JM Jacob | 23,077 | 36.5 | -5.3 | |
Liberal | T Turner | 6,935 | 11.0 | -5.3 | |
Majority | 10,196 | 16.1 | +15.8 | ||
Turnout | 81.3 | +0.8 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Jim Lester | 25,095 | 42.0 | 0.3 | |
Labour | Antony Gardner | 24,974 | 41.8 | +3.5 | |
Liberal | S Reddish | 9,658 | 16.2 | -3.2 | |
Majority | 121 | 0.2 | -3.9 | ||
Turnout | 80.5 | -4.4 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Jim Lester | 26,487 | 42.36 | N/A | |
Labour | Antony Gardner | 23,943 | 38.30 | N/A | |
Liberal | S Reddish | 12,091 | 19.34 | N/A | |
Majority | 2,544 | 4.07 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 84.91 | N/A | |||
Conservative win (new seat) |
gollark: That isn't really a goal. Virioids aren't going around thinking about their goals and how best to satisfy them. They just do things related to that due to the output of blind optimisation processes.
gollark: Things winning is often not determined by actual merit but unrelated factors and random chance. This happens a lot in computing, where a terrible standard comes first or is supported by big companies or something, and nobody can ever get everyone to switch.
gollark: I think it's just the sugar molecules on their own and presumably very concentrated.
gollark: I agree.
gollark: It's entirely possible to be consistent here. I would probably not like someone who only talked about their drug use whatever that was, but it's hard to say as I've never actually interacted with any.
References
- "'Beeston', Feb 1974 - May 1983". ElectionWeb Project. Cognitive Computing Limited. Archived from the original on 17 March 2016. Retrieved 16 March 2016.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.