Bathythermograph

The bathythermograph, or BT, also known as the Mechanical Bathythermograph, or MBT;[1] is a small torpedo-shaped device that holds a temperature sensor and a transducer to detect changes in water temperature versus depth down to a depth of approximately 285 meters (935 feet). Lowered by a small winch on the ship into the water, the BT records pressure and temperature changes on a coated glass slide as it is dropped nearly freely through the water.[2] While the instrument is being dropped, the wire is paid out until it reaches a predetermined depth, then a brake is applied and the BT is drawn back to the surface.[1] Because the pressure is a function of depth (see Pascal's law), temperature measurements can be correlated with the depth at which they are recorded.

"XBT" redirects here. For the cryptocurrency, see Bitcoin.

A bathythermograph

History

The true origins of the BT began in 1935 when Carl-Gustaf Rossby started experimenting. He then forwarded the development of the BT to his graduate student Athelstan Spilhaus, who then fully developed the BT in 1938[1] as a collaboration between MIT, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), and the U.S. Navy.[3] The device was modified during World War II to gather information on the varying temperature of the ocean for the U.S. Navy. Originally the slides were prepared "by rubbing a bit of skunk oil on with a finger and then wiping off with the soft side of one's hand,” followed by smoking the slide over the flame of a Bunsen burner.[4] Later on the skunk oil was replace with an evaporated metal film.[1]

Since water temperature may vary by layer and may affect sonar by producing inaccurate location results, bathothermographs (U.S. World War II spelling) were installed on the outer hulls of U.S. submarines during World War II.[5]

By monitoring variances, or lack of variances, in underwater temperature or pressure layers, while submerged, the submarine commander could adjust and compensate for temperature layers that could affect sonar accuracy. This was especially important when firing torpedoes at a target based strictly on a sonar fix.[5]

More importantly, when the submarine was under attack by a surface vessel using sonar, the information from the bathothermograph allowed the submarine commander to seek thermoclines, which are colder layers of water, that would distort the pinging from the surface vessel's sonar, allowing the submarine under attack to "disguise" its actual position and to escape depth charge damage and eventually to escape from the surface vessel.[5]

Throughout the use of the bathythermograph various technicians, watchstanders, and oceanographers noted how dangerous the deployment and retrieval of the BT was. According to watchstander Edward S. Barr:

"… In any kind of rough weather, this BT position was frequently subject to waves making a clean sweep of the deck. In spite of breaking waves over the side, the operator had to hold his station, because the equipment was already over the side. One couldn't run for shelter as the brake and hoisting power were combined in a single hand lever. To let go of this lever would cause all the wire on the winch to unwind, sending the recording device and all its cable to the ocean bottom forever. It was not at all uncommon, from the protective position of the laboratory door, to look back and see your watchmate at the BT winch completely disappear from sight as a wave would come crashing over the side. … We also took turns taking BT readings. It wasn't fair for only one person to get wet consistently."[6]

Expendable bathythermograph

After witnessing firsthand the dangers of deploying and retrieving BTs, James M. Snodgrass began developing the expendable bathythermograph (XBT). Snodgrass' description of the XBT:

Briefly, the unit would break down in two components, as follows: the ship to surface unit, and surface to expendable unit. I have in mind a package which could be jettisoned, either by the “Armstrong” method, or some simple mechanical device, which would at all times be connected to the surface vessel. The wire would be paid out from the surface ship and not from the surface float unit. The surface float would require a minimum of flotation and a small, very simple sea anchor. From this simple platform the expendable BT unit would sink as outlined for the acoustic unit. However, it would unwind as it goes a very fine thread of probably neutrally buoyant conductor terminating at the float unit, thence connected to the wire leading to the ship.[7]

In the early 1960s the U.S. Navy contracted Sippican Corporation of Marion, Massachusetts to develop the XBT, who became the sole supplier.[1]

An XBT being launched via a handheld launcher.

A rendering of an XBT probe.

The unit is composed of a probe; a wire link; and a shipboard canister. Inside of the probe is a thermistor which is connected electronically to a chart recorder. The probe falls freely at 20 feet per second and that determines its depth and provides a temperature-depth trace on the recorder. A pair of fine copper wires which pay out from both a spool retained on the ship and one dropped with the instrument, provide a data transfer line to the ship for shipboard recording. Eventually, the wire runs out and breaks, and the XBT sinks to the ocean floor. Since the deployment of an XBT does not require the ship to slow down or otherwise interfere with normal operations, XBT's are often deployed from vessels of opportunity, such as cargo ships or ferries, and also by dedicated research ships conducting underway operations when a CTD cast would require stopping the ship for several hours. Airborne versions (AXBT) are also used; these use radio frequencies to transmit the data to the aircraft during deployment. Today Lockheed Martin Sippican has manufactured over 5 million XBTs.

Types of XBTs

Source:[8]

Model	Applications	Maximum Depth	Rated Ship Speed	Vertical Resolution
T-4	Standard probe used by the U.S. Navy for ASW operations	460 m 1500 ft	30 knots	65 cm
T-5	Deep ocean scientific and military applications	1830 m 6000 ft	6 knots	65 cm
Fast Deep	Provides maximum depth capabilities at the highest possible ship speed of any XBT	1000 m 3280 ft	20 knots	65 cm
T-6	Oceanographic applications	460 m 1500 ft	15 knots	65 cm
T-7	Increased depth for improved sonar prediction in ASW and other military applications	760 m 2500 ft	15 knots	65 cm
Deep Blue	Increased launch speed for oceanographic and naval applications	760 m 2500 ft	20 knots	65 cm
T-10	Commercial fisheries applications	200 m 600 ft	10 knots	65 cm
T-11	High resolution for U.S. Navy mine counter-measures and physical oceanographic applications.	460 m 1500 ft	6 knots	18 cm

Participation by Month of Country and Institutions deploying XBTs

Below is the list of XBT deployments for 2013:[9]

Cntry/Month	JAN	FEB	MAR	APR	MAY	JUN	JUL	AUG	SEP	OCT	NOV	DEC	Total
AUS	233	292	241	277	311	397	278	313	316	208	232	262	3360
AUS/SIO	97	59	0	0	55	100	0	52	0	105	55	182	705
BRA	0	46	0	35	0	48	0	46	0	48	5	40	268
CAN	16	53	32	38	73	130	146	105	10	72	54	40	769
FRA	2	42	258	93	47	71	301	7	62	0	51	206	1140
GER	38	21	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	59
ITA	29	0	54	38	27	30	0	0	40	16	26	29	289
JPN	58	25	41	57	81	94	74	115	34	67	99	37	782
USA/AOML	477	477	773	2	812	341	559	634	456	436	235	396	5598
USA/SIO	788	87	607	240	350	591	172	300	382	525	104	477	4623
ZA	84	144	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	26	84	338
USA/Others	0	0	0	0	0	0	12	39	10	0	0	0	61
Total	1822	1246	2006	780	1756	1802	1542	1611	1310	1477	887	1753	17992

XBT Fall Rate Bias

Since XBTs do not measure depth (e.g. via pressure), fall-rate equations are used to derive depth profiles from what is essentially a time series. The fall rate equation takes the form:

${\displaystyle z(t)=at^{2}+bt}$

where, z(t) is the depth of the XBT in meters; t is time; and a & b are coefficients determined using theoretical and empirical methods. The coefficient b can be thought of as the initial speed as the probe hits the water. The coefficient a can be thought of as the reduction in mass with time as the wire spools off.

For a considerable time, these equations were relatively well-established, however in 2007 Gouretski and Koltermann showed a bias between XBT temperature measurements and CTD temperature measurements.[10] They also showed that this varies over time and could be due to both errors in the calculation of depth and in measurement of the temperature. From that the 2008 NOAA XBT Fall Rate Workshop[11] began to address the problem, with no viable conclusion as to how to proceed with adjusting the measurements. In 2010 the second XBT Fall Rate Workshop was held in Hamburg, Germany to continue discussing the problem and forge a way forward.[12]

A major implication of this is that a depth-temperature profile can be integrated to estimate upper ocean heat content; the bias in these equations lead to a warm bias in the heat content estimations. The introduction of Argo floats has provided a much more reliable source of temperature profiles than XBTs, however the XBT record remains important for estimating decadal trends and variability and hence much effort has been put into resolving these systematic biases. XBT correction needs to include both a drop-rate correction and a temperature correction.

Uses

• Oceanography and hydrography: to obtain information on the temperature structure of the ocean.
• Submarine and Anti-submarine warfare: to determine the layer depth (thermocline) used by submarines to avoid active sonar search.

See also

• Depth sounding
• Conductivity, temperature, depth
• Benthic lander
• CTD

References

1. Scripps Institution of Oceanography: Probing the Oceans 1936 to 1976. San Diego, Calif: Tofua Press, 1978. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/kt109nc2cj/
2. Stewart, Robert H. (2007). Introduction to Physical Oceanography (PDF). College Station: Texas A&M University. OCLC 169907785.
3. http://museum.mit.edu/150/134
4. Letter from Allyn Vine to Richard H. Fleming, 20 August 1941.
5. Blair, Jr., Clay (2001). Silent Victory, the U.S. Submarine war against Japan. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. p. 458. ISBN 1-55750-217-X.
6. “MIDPAC — The First Big Step,” manuscript, 17 August 1975.
7. “New Techniques in Undersea Technology,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. AES-2, No. 6 (November 1966), 626.
8. Lockheed Martin Sippican (September 2005). "Expendable Bathythermograph Expendable Sound Velocimeter (XBT/XSV) Expendable Profiling Systems" (PDF). p. 3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 February 2013. Retrieved 2015-07-20.
9. "SOOP Operations Report: XBT Program" (PDF). Atlantic Oceanographic & Meteorological Laboratory of NOAA. 31 October 2014. p. 2. Retrieved 20 July 2015.
10. Gouretski, V. V., and K. P. Koltermann, 2007, How much is the ocean really warming? Geophysical Research Letters, L01610, doi:10.1029/2006GL027834
11. "NOAA XBT Fall Rate Workshop". Retrieved 3 December 2013.
12. Viktor Gouretsk (25–27 August 2010). XBT Bias and Fall Rate Workshop Summary Report (PDF). XBT Bias and Fall Rate workshop. Hamburg, Germany. p. 14. Archived from the original (pdf) on 3 July 2013. Retrieved 8 May 2014.

• Blair, Clay Jr. (2001). Silent Victory, the U.S. Submarine war against Japan. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. p. 458. ISBN 1-55750-217-X.

External links

• Expendable Bathythermograph Expendable Sound Velocimeter (XBT/XSV) Expendable Profiling Systems from Lockheed Martin Sippican
• Climate and Atmospheric Science at Scripps: The Legacy of Jerome Namias (page 2 shows Jerome Namias with a bathythermograph)
• Scripps Institution of Oceanography: Probing the Oceans 1936 to 1976