Barry Posen

Barry Ross Posen (born July 13, 1952) is Ford International Professor of Political Science at MIT and the director of MIT's Security Studies Program. An expert in the field of security studies, he currently serves on the editorial boards of the journals International Security and Security Studies and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and served as a study group member for the Hart-Rudman Commission.

Barry R. Posen
Born (1952-07-13) July 13, 1952
NationalityAmerican
Alma materUniversity of California, Berkeley
Occidental College
Scientific career
FieldsPolitical science
InstitutionsMassachusetts Institute of Technology
Doctoral advisorKenneth Waltz
Doctoral studentsKenneth M. Pollack
Richard Wilcox

Posen received his B.A. from Occidental College in 1974 and his M.A. and PhD, under Kenneth Waltz, from the University of California, Berkeley in 1976 and 1981 respectively. Posen worked as a consultant for the RAND Corporation and an analyst for the Department of Defense and Center for Strategic and International Studies before becoming an assistant professor of political science at Princeton University in 1984. In 1987, he joined MIT as associate professor of political science and has taught at MIT since that time. He has also served as a consultant to the Woodrow Wilson Center, The Christian Science Monitor and the MacArthur Foundation.

Posen is the author of three books.[1] Posen has also published a number of highly influential journal articles, including "The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict" and "Command of the Commons: The Military Foundations of U.S. Hegemony." In addition to his scholarly work, Posen has frequently appeared in the media and published general interest articles in publications including The New York Times, The Boston Globe, and The American Interest.

Publications

The Sources of Military Doctrine

Posen's first book, The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany Between the World Wars, was published by Cornell University Press in 1984. The Sources of Military Doctrine focuses on how military doctrine is formed and how it shapes grand strategy.[2] The book won the 1984 Edgar S. Furniss Book Award from the Mershon Center for International Security Studies and the 1985 Woodrow Wilson Foundation Award, given annually by the American Political Science Association to the "best book on government, politics or international affairs."[1][3][4]

Inadvertent Escalation

Posen's second book is Inadvertent Escalation: Conventional War and Nuclear Risks, which was published by Cornell University Press in 1991.

Restraint

Posen's third book is Restraint: A New Foundation for U.S. Grand Strategy, which was published as part of the Cornell Studies in Security Affairs series in 2014.[5] The book is about two competing American grand strategies: liberal hegemony (which Posen opposes) and restraint (which Posen supports).[6] Restraint contains Posen's critique of liberal hegemony and his explanation for why restraint is a superior grand strategy.

Reviewer William Ruger, writing in The American Conservative, called the book the "defining treatise" for supporters of restraint.[6]

Notes
  1. "MIT Security Studies - Barry Posen". MIT. MIT. Retrieved 12 July 2015.
  2. Pierre, Andrew (Fall 1985). "Books: The Sources of Military Doctrine:France, Britain, and Germany Between the World Wars". Foreign Affairs.
  3. "Previous Winners". Mershon Center for International Security Studies. Archived from the original on June 30, 2010. Retrieved 3 January 2011.
  4. "Woodrow Wilson Foundation Award" (PDF). American Political Science Association. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 January 2011. Retrieved 3 January 2011.
  5. "Restraint". Amazon. Amazon.com. Retrieved 12 July 2015.
  6. Ruger, William (26 August 2014). "A Realist's Guide to Grand Strategy". The American Conservative. Retrieved 12 July 2015.
gollark: WHO HATH PINGED ME
gollark: HELLO LEVELOS USERS!
gollark: Hello PEOPLE!
gollark: It also makes potatOS's registry somewhat annoying to read or write with external programs.
gollark: PBOR is an inefficient, utterly pointless serialization format, so I see no reason not to use it honestly.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.