Associated Press v. United States
Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1 (1945), was a United States Supreme Court case on U.S. antitrust law.
| Associated Press v. United States | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued December 5–6, 1944 Decided June 18, 1945 | |
| Full case name | Associated Press v. United States; Tribune Company v. United States; United States v. Associated Press |
| Citations | 326 U.S. 1 (more) 65 S. Ct. 1416; 89 L. Ed. 2013 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Certiorari to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York |
| Holding | |
| The Associated Press violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by prohibiting member newspapers from selling or providing any news to nonmember organizations as well as making it very difficult for nonmember newspapers to join the AP. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Black, joined by Reed, Douglas, Rutledge (in full); Stone, Roberts, Frankfurter, Murphy (in parts) |
| Concurrence | Douglas |
| Concurrence | Frankfurter (in judgment) |
| Concur/dissent | Roberts, joined by Stone |
| Concur/dissent | Murphy |
| Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Facts
The Associated Press (AP) had prohibited member newspapers from selling or providing news (whether that news was supplied by the AP, or was authored by the member newspaper - called "spontaneous" news) to nonmember organizations as well as making it very difficult for nonmember newspapers to join the AP.
Originally there were three separate cases (Associated Press et al. v. U.S., Tribune Company et al. v. U.S. and U.S. v. Associated Press et al.) that were joined into one when heard at the Supreme Court.
Judgment
The Supreme Court held that Associated Press had violated the Sherman Act. The bylaws of AP at that time, as written, constituted restraint of trade. The fact that AP had not achieved a complete monopoly was irrelevant. The First Amendment did not excuse newspapers from violating the Sherman Antitrust Act. News, traded between states, counts as interstate commerce, and thus makes the issue relevant for the Sherman Antitrust Act. Finally, Freedom of the press from governmental interference under the First Amendment does not sanction repression of that freedom by private interests (326 U.S. 20).
See also
- US antitrust law
- International News Service v. Associated Press (1918) - a copyright Supreme Court case
Notes
External links
- Text of Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1 (1945) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Justia Library of Congress