Arnost Zvi Ehrman

Rabbi Dr Arnost Zvi Ehrman (1914–1976) is best known for his work as editor of the Talmud El Am (cf below). In addition, his contribution on Jewish law is evident in a number of learned articles and conference papers on the subject. Professor Bernard Jackson wrote of "the debt that modern scholarship in Jewish law owes him" (The Jewish Law Annual 3, 1980).

Biography

Born in Czechoslovakia in 1914, Ehrman studied at the Yeshiva in Kleinwardein (Hungarian: Kisvárda; Yiddish: קליינווארדיין) and, in 1932, went to live in Switzerland, where he stayed until the end of World War II. He first studied in the Yeshiva at Baden and then at the University of Bern, where he obtained degrees in Political Science and Law (Rer.Pol. and Dr Jur.). See History of the Jews in Switzerland #Modern Switzerland. After the war, Ehrman went to England and obtained the Rabbinical semicha (ordination) from Jews' College, London, in 1947. Moving to Israel, he became a member of the Israeli Bar.

Ehrman served as Rabbi in the communities of Nairobi, Kenya and Bristol, England in the 1950s and in Streatham, London and in Watford in the 1970s. In between, he lived in Israel with his family, working first for the Ministry of Religious Affairs, then as a Research Fellow at the Institute for Research in Jewish Law, indexing the responsa of the Rosh; from 1965, he worked on his edition of the Talmud El Am. He also contributed numerous articles to the Encyclopaedia Judaica. Rabbi Dr Ehrman died in England in 1976.

The Talmud El Am

In the 1960s the Talmud was seen as "a sealed book to the majority of the Jewish People", wrote Rabbi Dr Ehrman. He went on to say that the object of this new edition was "to open this sealed volume and to offer it to every Jewish home in a language and in a manner understandable to all; and also to enable one who is not a Jew to acquaint himself with the treasures of Judaism contained in it". At the time, making the Talmud available to English speakers in this way was trailblazing. It was decades before similar ventures were realised (for example by the Steinsaltz and Schottenstein editions).

The Talmud El Am prints the original text, punctuated, alongside Ehrman's translation. Below the text is his Commentary, which explains the text and the (mainly) Biblical references within it; Ehrman's text incorporates traditional Talmud Commentaries as well as contemporary scholarship. The Commentary is written as a continuous text, so that anyone unfamiliar with the Talmud may be able to learn. The margins carry articles on points of special interest raised by the text. These 'Realia' are written by contemporary authorities on subjects such as specific customs, philology, law, flora and fauna, often accompanied by illustrations. Notes on the Tannaim and Amoraim are also given here, as and when these Sages figure in the text.

The Talmud El Am edition contains Tractate Berakhot, chapters from Bava Metzia (Hammaphqid and Hazzahav), and the halachic section of the opening chapter of Kiddushin (29 Talmudic pages). Hazzahav adds the Jerusalem Talmud – edited by Rabbi Professor Daniel Sperber - at the end of the Babylonian text. The end of Berakhot is the work of Rabbi Dr Alexander Carlebach, who took over the editorship towards the end of Rabbi Dr Ehrman's life.

Bibliography

  • Uber das Wesen und die Wirkungen der Zollunion, insbesonders uber de Frage in wieweit die Staatssouveranitat durch die Zollunion beeintrachtigt wird. (Doctoral thesis). W.Friedli, Bern 1942
  • Der Handschlag. Eine kleine Talmudisch-rechtliche Studie. W.Friedfli Bern 1945
  • 'The Talmudic Concept of Sale', Journal of Jewish Studies, VIII/3-4, 1957
  • 'Christian Interest in Rabbinics: John Selden (1584–1654)', Christian News From Israel,13/1. 1962
  • 'Gentile Interest in Jewish Law: A Chapter from Selden's "De Successionibus", Christian News from Israel, 13/3-4, 1962
  • 'Antichresis in the Talmud' (Hebrew with English summary), Sinai, 54/4-5, 1964
  • 'The Order of Succession in Jewish Law – Selden against Origen' (Hebrew), Papers of the Fourth World Congress of Jewish Studies, vol.1, Jerusalem 1967
  • 'Consideration in Jewish Law and English Law' (Hebrew), Papers of the Fifth World Congress of Jewish Studies, vol. III Jerusalem, 1972
  • 'Praetium justum and laesio enormis in Roman and Jewish sources', The Jewish Law Annual, 3, 1980
  • 'Fidei laesio in Jewish Law', paper delivered at the Sixth World Congress of Jewish Studies, Jerusalem 1973
  • Editor of Talmud El Am (cf separate entry above), Jerusalem-Tel Aviv, 1965–1976
  • Articles in Encyclopaedia Judaica: Antichresis, Asmakhta, Berakhoth, Conditions, Eduyoth, Kerithoth, Kinnim, Kethuboth, Horayoth, Kiddushin, Me'ila, Middoth, Menachoth, Megillah, Mo'ed Katan, Pesachim, Sanhedrin, Rosh Hashanah, Shekalim, Shabbath, Shevu'oth, Shevi'ith, Sotah, Temurah, Tamid.
gollark: A 17x17 grid is small enough that you can probably get away with inefficiency, ubq.
gollark: I see.
gollark: Oops too many newlines.
gollark: Quoted from my notes:The relevant factors for course choice are probably something like this, vaguely in order: “personal fit” - how much I'll actually like it. This is quite hard to tell in advance. During the Y11 careers interview I was recommended some kind of trial thing for engineering, but I doubt that's on now, like many other things. Probably more important than other things, as I'd spend 3-5 years on said course, will perform better if I do enjoy it, and will probably not get much use out of studying a subject I would not like enough to do work related to. flexibility/generality - what options are opened by studying this stuff? Especially important in a changing and unpredictable world. how hard a subject is to learn out of university - relates to necessity of feedback from people who know it much better, specialized equipment needed, availability of good teaching resources, etc. Likely to decline over time due to the internet/modern information exchange systems and advancing technology making relevant equipment cheaper. earning potential - how much money does studying this bring? I don't think this is massively significant, it's probably outweighed by other things quite rapidly, but something to consider. Apparently high for quantitative and applied subjects. entry requirements - how likely I am to be able to study it. There are some things I probably cannot do at all now, such as medicine, but I didn't and don't really care about those, and there shouldn't be many. Most of the high-requirement stuff is seemingly available with more practical ones at less prestigious universities, which is probably fine.
gollark: Replying to https://discord.com/channels/346530916832903169/348702212110680064/759121895022002206Well, yes, somewhat, BUT! There are other considerations™.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.