Altsasu incident (2016)

The Altsasu incident is a judicial case against eight young people from Altsasu, a small town in Navarre, Spain, for their involvement in a fight taking place on 15 October 2016 at a bar in which two off-duty Civil Guard officers stationed in the town and their girlfriends sustained injuries. One of the officers was knocked down, with the other victims reported to have suffered "psychological trauma".[1][2] The lawsuit was initially conducted by the judge of the Spanish special court Audiencia Nacional Carmen Lamela. As of March 2018, Concepción Espejel was appointed as magistrate ahead of the trial held in late April.[3][4]

Support from Navarre to the accused opposite the Audiencia Nacional (Madrid)

The case was controversial because the public prosecutor described it was a "terrorist attack" and called for sentences ranging between 12 and 62 years,[5] and for the heavy-handed approach of Spanish Justice in the case, amid allegations of irregularities and lack of neutrality in the proceedings.[6] The National Court dismissed the terrorism charges, but convicted them with heavy sentences ranging from 2 to 13 years. The state prosecutor appealed the sentence in June 2018, insisting on the existence of 'terrorism', but it was again dismissed in March 2019.

The final decision to the appeal filed by the detainees' parents on the Supreme Court was issued on 9 October 2019. The convictions were further reduced to sentences ranging from one year and a half to nine years and a half prison terms; two judges out of five issued a dissenting opinion, stating that discrimination charges should have been upheld. The relatives of the youngsters condemned and their defense lawyer Amaia Izko, despite saluting the reduction of sentences, considered they did not tie in with the actual circumstances, highlighting the "lack of guarantees during the process" and the "artificial account of the events".[7]

All along the process, the parents of the defendants led a campaign for solidarity with the defendants and to denounce the circumstances surrounding the detention and the proceedings, with meetings and large demonstrations taking place across Navarre and the Basque Country overall. The Spanish Socialists, Spanish right-wing political parties and media, as well as Covite, an ETA victims' association, harshly criticized the aggressors, signs of support and the people of Altsasu, besides praising the Civil Guard.

Evolution of events

Judicial statements and evidence

According to the judge, the two Spanish policemen were dressed in civilian clothes. At the local Altsasu festival, a number of youngsters approached them in the bar, asking them to leave. The policemen asked to be left alone but "later on, twenty-five other people approached them, with fifteen or twenty of them insulting and beating them until the patrols arrived". Iñaki Abad, one of the convicted youths, recorded a video on his mobile phone showing the Civil Guard officer who, according to the prosecution, had been "brutally battered on the ground", walking in a clean, white shirt moments after the events; he then walks over to Abad and smacks his phone away, but eventually shakes hands and talks with one of the defendants.

The footage, which calls into question the prosecution's case, was initially rejected as evidence by the special tribunal, but was later accepted after it was made public.[8] Besides this evidence, the tribunal dismissed another piece of evidence submitted by the defense, namely witnesses and other footage of the incident of the events and afterwards, as well as pictures depicting the actual dimensions of the bar where the attack took place, as denounced by the defense.[9]

Media attention and build-up

The incident immediately attracted a great deal of attention from the main Spanish media, echoing straight-away the Civil Guard's report, with their headlines highlighting that 50 people had attacked two Civil Guard officers.[10][11][12][13] A convoy of over 20 Civil Guard SUVs rushed into the town, as shown on the media.[14] The alleged aggressors handed themselves in to the regional police and the jurisdictional tribunal in Pamplona. They were subsequently released, having been charged. The interior minister Jorge Fernández Díaz stepped in, labelling it "a hate crime", but an isolated incident, "not kale borroka", also stating that the aggression "proves the town is gripped by a social pathology". Residents for their part protested the media were "turning the town into a circus act", bitterly criticizing the 'manipulation' of the events.[15]

Four days later, the ETA victims' association Covite filed a report in the National Court against the defendants for alleged hate and terrorism offenses, as well as reporting Twitter accounts, the local movement Ospa and the campaign Alde hemendik! (Basque for "get out of here").[16][lower-alpha 1] The National Court soon demanded the transfer of the case from its jurisdictional tribunal to the special court in Madrid, a request accepted by the Supreme Court of Spain, despite the regional tribunal's dismissal of terrorism charges.[17]

Initial charges

The eight youths accused (Ohian Arnanz Ziordia, Jokin Unamuno Goikoetxea, Jon Ander Cob Amilibia, Julen Goikoetxea Larraza, Adur Ramirez de Alda Pozueta, Aratz Urrizola Ortigosa, Iñaki Abad Olea and Ainara Urkijo Goikoetxea) were charged with a string of offenses including ‘terrorism’; three of them were remanded and held under special regulations, with the others being released on bail.

One of the group faced a sentence of 62 years in prison, the rest 50 years, except for one defendant liable for 12.[17] The youths were imprisoned under the article 573 of the Penal Code passed in 2015 by Mariano Rajoy's People's Party, which had been designed to crack down on Jihadism, the defense claimed.[18]

Evolution of proceedings

In February 2018, the defense recused the new judge appointed to the case, Concepción Espejel, for her marriage to a Civil Guard colonel and for holding the Order of Merit of the Civil Guard awarded by the Home Office; the petition was declined for being 'untimely'.[19] The hearings took place from 16 to 27 April. On 1 June 2018, the sentence was announced, with the National Court eventually dismissing the terrorism charges and finding the accused guilty of injuring and attacking an agent of the authority, aggravated with abuse of superiority, discrimination and public disorders and threats. One of the accused was sentenced to 2 years of prison, three with 9 years, two with 12 years and the remaining two with 13 years.[20]

The families, besides labeling the sentence 'outrageous' and an act of 'revenge', announced their plans to appeal.[21] Four days later, the Civil Guard in Altsasu arrested four defendants and sent them to prison on "flight risk" grounds.[22] On 14 June 2018, the state prosecutor appealed the sentence, arguing again that "there was terrorism" involved.[23] Six days later, Iñaki Abad's sentence was reduced by 3 years, "due to an error", and the verdict was modified, with the judge now accepting he initial evidence given by María José, N.C., a victim of the attack, who said that Abad was not among the aggressors.[24]

On 7 March 2019, the sentence for the appeals made by the defense and the prosecution was leaked to the Spanish radio station Cadena Ser ahead of its official announcement by the National Court to the parts involved, confirming for the most part the initial verdict: no terrorism was involved but heavy sentences were still appropriate, due to aggravating circumstances, like "ideological discrimination" against the Civil Guard officers and their girlfriends. Iñaki Abad's sentence was reduced to a 6-year prison term.[25][lower-alpha 2]

The final decision to the appeal filed by the detainees' relatives on the Supreme Court was issued on 9 October 2019, with the tribunal calling the aggression 'abominable' for having addressed it to Civil Guard officers, but ultimately dismissing "ideological discrimination" and "abuse of authority";[7] the sentence disregards the public prosecutor's statement in mid-September holding that "the Civil Guard was being targetted for their commitment to the King and the people of Spain".[26] The convictions were further reduced to sentences ranging from one year and a half to nine years and a half; two judges out of five issued a dissenting opinion, stating that discrimination charges should have been upheld. The relatives of the youngsters condemned and their defense lawyer Amaia Izko, despite saluting the reduction of sentences, considered they did not tie in with the actual circumstances, highlighting the "lack of guarantees during the process" and the "artificial account of the events".[7]

Statements heard during proceedings
Demonstration at Pamplona in support of the defendants (April 2018)

The trial became the centre of media attention for the heavy sentences requested and the circumstances surrounding the trial, including certain statements:

"What we are seeing in the 21st century Spain is people asking others whose job they do not like to get out of town. It is xenophobia, racism, full-blown fascism, since that is what the supremacist Basque nationalists stand for, imbued as they are with outmoded nationalism". José Perals, National Court's prosecutor[27]

Early support in Altsasu to the defendants, denouncing their judicial treatment
Event in solidarity with the defendants at Vitoria-Gasteiz

"We consider that if no terrorism is considered in cases like this, we would be going back 20 years, when ETA's youth organizations Segi, Jarrai and Haika roamed unrestrained across the towns of the Basque Country and Navarre, and some said that it was nothing but the kale borroka, petrol boys". José Perals, National Court's prosecutor[27]

"[The sentence shows] absolute contempt for the principle of justice, it is completely disproportionate; it is about revenge, with the clear aim of generating pain". Parents of the defendants[28]

Reactions

Criticism of the attack

The heavy-handed approach of the public prosecutor and the judge to the defendants has led to a rise in the explicit support of the main ETA victims' associations, Ciudadanos and the Spanish Conservatives in office, as they see a link to an "ETA strategy" in the alleged assault based on Civil Guard reports.[29][30][31] On 22 October 2016, the head of COVITE Consuelo Ordoñez visited Altsasu along with three other individuals and a notable media presence next to a local meeting protesting the Civil Guard's presence and the "staged police set-up" in relation to the assault; Ordoñez held placards reading slogans in support of the Civil Guard and against 'fear'.[32] The following day, the Spanish premier Mariano Rajoy intervened, stating that "there will be no impunity" for the "brutal assault".[33]

On 18 April 2018, approximately 2,500 people attended a meeting held in Pamplona called by several parties (PP, UPN, PSN and Ciudadanos) and two ETA victims associations to show their support to the Civil Guard officers and girlfriends subject of the aggression, also bitterly criticizing the Navarrese government for their stance on the issue.[34][35] On 1 June, the main Civil Guard association AUGC hailed the sentences imposed on the defendants in the hope that this will "reduce hostility" towards the paramilitary police body and "improve cohabitation". It added that "it is not acceptable under the rule of law to have public security forces and their families, many of them underage, deprived of leading a peaceful life because of their uniform".[36]

The Spanish Conservatives (PP) in Navarre held that the motion passed by the Parliament of Navarre, which criticised the alleged lack of proportion seen in the sentencing was "supporting the executioners and not the victims".[37] Pablo Casado, elected head of the Spanish PP in July 2018, visited the Civil Guard headquarters in Altsasu during the run-up to the party presidency campaign, to show his support for the Civil Guard, declaring that "there can be no impartiality between thugs battering innocent people in a bar and public servants who risk their lives battling for our rights and liberties".[38][lower-alpha 3]

Criticism of the process

Elsewhere, the case has caused outrage and perplexity among many political, social and institutional sectors in Altsasu, Navarre, and the Basque Country in general, with many calling into question the official account of events.[39][40][41][30][42][43] In July 2017, 52 MEPs affiliated to five different parliamentary groups signed a public document requesting the intervention in the case of the president of the European Commission Jean-Claude Junker "for the sake of proportionality, equity and justice", emphasizing that the state prosecutor's prison term petition was "disproportionate, nonsensical and antidemocratic".[44] The European Commission in turn announced it would closely watch the developments in the judicial process.[45]

Amnesty International, while labelling the incident "a very serious offence", pointed to the risk of trivialization and ambiguity of the 'terrorism' charge, as well as "lack of proportion" in the indictments requested.[46] It also voiced its concern that the judicial process may be "breaching impartiality" and "discriminating the defendants based on their ideology", also adding that the accusation of 'terrorism' should have never happened. Also in June 2018, the one-time magistrate of the National Court Baltasar Garzón called the whole process an 'embarrassment' spurred by an urge to satisfy the grudges or wishes for revenge held by certain sectors in Spain, using the judiciary for the purpose.[47] Similarly, football coach Pep Guardiola criticized in June 2019 the 900-day imprisonment of the perpetrators and the Spanish state's alleged meddling in this and other cases, like those arrested in relation to the Catalan process.[48]

Parents of the defendants in the European Parliament
Rally in Pamplona to denounce the final sentence, "This is not justice" (October 2019)

Ahead of the trial hearings in April, a rally was held on 14 April in Pamplona to protest against the conditions in which proceedings were taking place and in support of the defendants and their families. Between 30,000 and 50,000 protesters turned out to the streets of Pamplona. The mayor of Pamplona Joseba Asiron, on behalf of the Local Council, and Maria Solana, the representative of the regional government, attended the protest, which was also supported by the unions LAB, ELA, CC.OO and the parties in office at Navarre. By contrast, the call was opposed by the parties UPN, PSN and PP of Navarre.[49][50][51][52]

The unexpected arrests, amid strong security measures, of four defendants in Altsasu on 5 June, raised the level of indignation in Altsasu and Navarre against the judicial peculiarities and 'disproportion' surrounding the case. "A court summons would have done", the mother of a defendant remarked. The parents of those arrested claimed the whole process was fraught with irregularities, "a juridical aberration".[53] They announced a demonstration in Pamplona on 16 June in which they expected a greater number of protesters than those who turned out to the demonstration on 14 April.[53] The Government and Parliament of Navarre have also showed their support for the families in "their quest for justice".[54]

On 16 June, between 30,000 and 80,000 people took to the streets in Pamplona under the banner "this is not justice" and showed solidarity with the young prisoners, who were being held 500 kilometres away from home.[55][56] The rally, probably the largest held at Pamplona in recent times, received wide support from political personalities (PNV, EH Bildu, Podemos, etc.), a number of unions, and individuals coming from different parts of Spain.[55][56][57][lower-alpha 4] On 24 March 2019, 35,000 to 60,000 protesters took to the streets of Altsasu bearing the same slogan; the protest was also attended by a number of high-ranking officials and representatives of Navarre and Altsasu; the organizers denounced the "lack of neutrality and rigour" during the proceedings.[58][59][60][61] A significant number of demonstrators arrived from other parts of Spain and Catalonia, beyond the Basque region.[62]" Following the final sentence on early October 2019, the relatives of the convicts called a demonstration on 26 October in Pamplona to protest the "lack of proportionality" in the sentence under the banner "this is not justice"; it was attended by the mayor of Altsasu and several thousands of marchers, 7,500 according to local police forces, 52,000 according to the organizers.[63]

Political fallout

The case has become a rallying cry for the Spanish right and far-right, with nationalistic overtones. On 4 November 2018, a group of people led by Albert Rivera from Ciudadanos and Fernando Savater, rode in a bus from Santander Altsasu to stage an event.[64] They were followed by PP and Vox, delivering a hardline message against pro-independence advocates amidst a tense atmosphere and claiming their right to speak in the town. They were escorted by the National Police and Civil Guard deployed in full riot gear throughout, and who established a security cordon.[64]

The committee was met by different groups of locals protesting their presence. While addressing a speech to their followers, the town bells started to chime for the whole duration of the event, accompanied at times by a siren and a rock concert which had been staged nearby.[64] On 30 May 2019, a €3000 fine was given to the youths who entered the church to ring the bells. Ospa movement members claimed that from January to April 2019, police stopped 168 cars in the town or its vicinity at roadblocks, 63 of which were conducted by the Civil Guard and the remaining 105 by the Navarrese Foral Police.[65]

On the eve of the National Court's announcement of the sentence in March 2019, Popular Party leader Pablo Casado visited the bar in Altsasu where the assault took place in order to take part in a TV interview. However, it was cut short by the bar owner, who asked them to leave the place as they had not asked permission to shoot. The interviewer, a well-known, controversial Spanish journalist, stated that "25 pro-ETA thugs" ('proetarras') were lurking outside, with the Civil Guard's intervention eventually saving Casado, him and his crew, although available footage clearly disputes such claims.[66]

gollark: If the reactor is ever loaded without the machinery supplying it fuel it will probably shut down at some point. Which would be bad, since we have no backup.
gollark: It's on the ravineward side of the reactor and I believe all the supply systems for it should load at the same time as it on restart.
gollark: You do it. I don't have the game started.
gollark: I don't trust unloading to not do horrible stuff to my reactor.
gollark: Check that the ignition laser is at 2GRF and do it if so.

See also

Notes
  1. The movement Ospa and the campaign Alde hemendik! advocates for the retreat of the Civil Guard from Altsasu.
  2. "Ideological discrimination" charges were brought forward for being directed at the paramilitary police body Civil Guard, a consideration coming up against much juridic criticism, and even dubbed 'untenable', cf. "La AN ratifica el agravante por 'discriminación ideológica' en el caso Alsasua". EITB (in Spanish). 2019-03-08. Retrieved 2020-03-04.
  3. He also labelled any governmental initiatives to bring Basque prisoners closer to their families as a 'concession', also stating that "the illness of hate, sectarianism, xenophobia we have suffered for long years in Spain, we need to start healing it", and lashing out at those who regarded his visit in Altsasu as opportunist, considering them a token of "a sick society". He went on to assert that the Basque flag "does not belong in Navarre, and Basque is not the language of Navarre", see Irazusta, A. ETB. 25-05-2018. "Polémica en Navarra con las palabras de Pablo Casado sobre el euskera"
  4. It counted on the support of 150 coaches arriving from several Catalan and Spanish locations, a strong support from the Catalan pro-independence movement, and figures such as Barricada singer Enrique Villarreal "El Drogas", singer Mikel Markez, or the physicist Pedro Miguel Etxenike.

References
  1. Parra | AP, Aritz (2018-04-16). "Terrorism accusation in Basque bar brawl reopens old wounds". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2018-04-29.
  2. Madrid, Pascale Davies in (2018-04-14). "Basque bar fight trial tests 10 years of fragile peace in the region". the Guardian. Retrieved 2018-05-02.
  3. "Caso Alsasua: piden apartar a la jueza Espejel por estar casada con un guardia civil. Noticias de España". El Confidencial (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-21.
  4. "Los jóvenes de Alsasua procesados por terrorismo recusan a la juez Espejel por estar casada con un coronel de la Guardia Civil" (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-21.
  5. El fiscal acusa de terrorismo y fascismo a los agresores de Alsasua in elperiodico.com (in Spanish)
  6. "Drakonische Strafen in Spanien". www.zdf.de (in German). Retrieved 2019-03-28.
  7. "El Supremo rebaja las penas a los jóvenes de Alsasua, pero seguirán en prisión". www.eitb.eus (in Spanish). Retrieved 2019-10-09.
  8. Barcelona, El Periódico / (2018-04-26). "Un nuevo vídeo desmiente la versión de los guardias civiles de Alsasua". elperiodico (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-15.
  9. "Los puntos negros del caso Altsasu: así se convierte una pelea de bar en 'terrorismo'". www.publico.es. Retrieved 2019-01-27.
  10. "Dos guardias civiles fuera de servicio, agredidos por unas 50 personas en Alsasua". Antena 3 Noticias (in Spanish). 2016-10-15. Retrieved 2020-01-27.
  11. "En libertad los dos detenidos por la agresión a los guardias civiles en Alsasua". El Confidencial (in Spanish). 2016-10-17. Retrieved 2020-01-27.
  12. "Dos detenidos por la agresión en Alsasua a dos guardias civiles de paisano y a sus parejas". El País (in Spanish). 2016-10-16. ISSN 1134-6582. Retrieved 2020-01-27.
  13. "Dos guardias civiles agredidos por 50 personas en Alsasua". El Plural (in Spanish). Retrieved 2020-01-27.
  14. "La Policía de Navarra identifica a más implicados en la agresión a dos guardias civiles en Alsasua". Antena3 (in Spanish). 2018-07-02. Retrieved 2020-01-27.
  15. Elia, N. "La tensión política no remite en Alsasua". eldiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2019-10-09.
  16. Vasca, EiTB Radio Televisión Pública. "Covite denuncia a los imputados de Alsasua por delito de terrorismo". www.eitb.eus (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-07-22.
  17. España, La Nueva. "El fiscal pide 62 años a un detenido de Alsasua, 50 a otros seis y 12 a un octavo". Retrieved 2018-04-29.
  18. "La defensa de los detenidos en Alsasua denuncia que se les aplica la ley antiyihadista" (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-15.
  19. "Rechazada la petición de los acusados de Alsasua de apartar a la jueza Espejel". El Español (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-08-11.
  20. La Audiencia Nacional no ve terrorismo en la agresión de Alsasua in elperiodico.com (in Spanish)
  21. Vasca, EiTB Radio Televisión Pública. "Las familias de los jóvenes de Alsasua califican la sentencia de 'venganza'". www.eitb.eus (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-23.
  22. Vasca, EiTB Radio Televisión Pública. "La Guardia Civil detiene a los jóvenes condenados en el caso Alsasua". www.eitb.eus (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-15.
  23. "La Fiscalía recurre la condena de Alsasua al entender que la agresión a dos guardias civiles sí fue terrorismo". eldiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-15.
  24. infoLibre. "La Audiencia Nacional reduce tres años la condena a un joven de Alsasua por un error en el cómputo". infoLibre.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-21.
  25. Política, eldiario es. "La Audiencia Nacional confirma las penas para los condenados de Alsasua pero insiste en que no fue terrorismo". eldiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2019-03-08.
  26. infoLibre (2019-09-18). "La Fiscalía afirma que en Alsasua se atacó a la Guardia Civil por ser "fiel al rey y al pueblo español"". infoLibre.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2019-10-09.
  27. Vázquez, Ángeles (2018-04-26). "El fiscal acusa de terrorismo y fascismo a los agresores de Alsasua". elperiodico (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-01.
  28. "Las familias de los condenados de Alsasua: "Es una venganza, un absoluto desprecio al principio de justicia"". eldiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-06.
  29. Cuevas, Paloma (2018-04-17). "Vivas a España y a la Guardia Civil en el acto en apoyo a los agentes de Alsasua". Libertad Digital (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-04-29.
  30. Doria, Javier Lorente (2018-04-17). "Víctimas de ETA congregan a cientos de personas en apoyo a las víctimas de Alsasua". EL PAÍS (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-04-29.
  31. Pérez, Fernando J. (2018-04-24). "La Guardia Civil relaciona la agresión de Alsasua con la estrategia de ETA". EL PAÍS (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-04-30.
  32. Press, Europa (2016-10-22). "Consuelo Ordóñez encabeza en Alsasua un "acto de rebeldía" en medio de una protesta contra la Guardia Civil". europapress.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-07-22.
  33. "Rajoy asegura que "no habrá impunidad" tras la "brutal agresión" de Alsasua". El Español (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-23.
  34. Vasca, EiTB Radio Televisión Pública. "Unas 2.500 personas apoyan a los guardias civiles agredidos en Alsasua". www.eitb.eus (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-15.
  35. Doria, Javier Lorente (2018-04-17). "Víctimas de ETA congregan a cientos de personas en apoyo a las víctimas de Alsasua". EL PAÍS (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-15.
  36. Press, Europa (2018-06-01). "AUGC espera que baje la hostilidad hacia los guardias civiles tras la condena por acoso contra los agentes de Alsasua". www.europapress.es. Retrieved 2019-03-25.
  37. "'Bar brawl' sentence rejects terror theory but sparks outrage". The Irish Times. Retrieved 2018-06-20.
  38. "Pablo Casado denuncia en Alsasua que "no hay equidistancia entre matones y servidores públicos"". ELMUNDO (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-07-21.
  39. "Barkos avisa de que la Comisión Europea puede darle "otro tirón de orejas" a España con las agresiones de Alsasua". eldiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-04-29.
  40. "Uno de los presos de Altsasu, castigado por agradecer las muestras de solidaridad". Público (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-04-29.
  41. "Bilbao denuncia la 'injusticia' del caso Altsasu a menos de un mes de que empiece el juicio" (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-04-29.
  42. "Una marea humana pide justicia para los jóvenes de Altsasu: 'No son terroristas'". Público (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-04-29.
  43. "Alsasua, el caso de la agresión a guardias civiles que causa indignación en Navarra". La Vanguardia. Retrieved 2018-04-30.
  44. "52 eurodiputados piden a Juncker que intervenga en el caso Altsasu" (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-07-22.
  45. "La Comisión Europea seguirá de cerca el juicio contra los jóvenes de Altsasu" (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-07-22.
  46. Vasca, EiTB Radio Televisión Pública. "AI, sobre el 'Caso Alsasua': 'No debe existir definición vaga de terrorismo'". www.eitb.eus (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-04-29.
  47. "Alsasua: el terrorismo como obsesión". eldiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-20.
  48. "Pep Guardiola: "I am deeply offended that the pro-independence parties do not stand together"". Ara.cat (in Catalan). 2019-06-30. Retrieved 2019-07-04.
  49. "Miles de personas defienden en Pamplona que la agresión de Alsasua "no es terrorismo" - El Independiente". El Independiente (in Spanish). 2018-04-14. Retrieved 2018-06-21.
  50. Doria, Javier Lorente (2018-04-15). "Miles de personas defienden a los detenidos de Alsasua". EL PAÍS (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-21.
  51. "Barkos cree hay que responder a "incontestable" manifestación de caso Alsasua". eldiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-21.
  52. "Una marea humana pide justicia para los jóvenes de Altsasu: 'No son terroristas'" (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-21.
  53. "What Would Have Happened If the Government Had Done Nothing", Employment and Development under Globalization, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, doi:10.1057/9781137001412.0005, ISBN 9781137001412
  54. "'Bar brawl' sentence rejects terror theory but sparks outrage". The Irish Times. Retrieved 2018-06-18.
  55. Vasca, EiTB Radio Televisión Pública. "80.000 personas abarrotan Pamplona reclamando justicia para los jóvenes de Alsasua". www.eitb.eus (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-18.
  56. "Miles de personas se manifiestan en Pamplona para pedir "justicia y proporcionalidad" en el 'caso Alsasua'". eldiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-18.
  57. "Una histórica marea humana pide la libertad de los jóvenes de Altsasu" (in Spanish). Retrieved 2018-06-18.
  58. "Una multitudinaria manifestación rechaza la sentencia del caso Altsasu". www.publico.es. Retrieved 2019-03-24.
  59. Ariztegi, Miguel M. "Decenas de miles de personas rechazan en Alsasua la sentencia de la Audiencia Nacional". eldiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2019-03-24.
  60. infoLibre (2019-03-24). "Una multitudinaria manifestación rechaza la sentencia del 'caso Alsasua'". infoLibre.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 2019-03-24.
  61. "Milers de persones es manifesten a Altsasu en contra de la sentència de l'Audiència Nacional". Ara.cat (in Catalan). 2019-03-24. Retrieved 2019-03-24.
  62. "60.000 personas marchan en Alsasua contra las penas impuestas a ocho jóvenes". www.eitb.eus (in Spanish). Retrieved 2019-03-24.
  63. "Denuncian la 'injusticia' del caso Alsasua ante el Palacio de Justicia de Pamplona". Euskal Irrati Telebista (in Spanish). 2019-10-26. Retrieved 2019-10-27.
  64. "La iglesia de Altsasu repica sus campanas contra la polémica visita de Ciudadanos, VOX y PP". www.publico.es. Retrieved 2019-06-02.
  65. "Más de tres mil euros en multas por las campanadas contra Rivera en Altsasu". www.publico.es. Retrieved 2019-06-02.
  66. "Lo ha vuelto a hacer: Eduardo Inda monta el show en Alsasua junto a Pablo Casado". cuatro (in Spanish). 2019-03-07. Retrieved 2019-03-08.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.