Alexander Kenneth Maclean

Alexander Kenneth Maclean, PC (October 18, 1869 – July 31, 1942) was a Canadian politician and judge.

The Hon.

Alexander Kenneth Maclean
Member of the Canadian Parliament
for Lunenburg
In office
1904–1911
Preceded byCharles Edwin Kaulbach
Succeeded byJohn Drew Sperry
Member of the Canadian Parliament
for Halifax
In office
1911–1923
Member of the Nova Scotia House of Assembly for Lunenburg
In office
1901–1904
In office
1909–1911
Personal details
Born(1869-10-18)October 18, 1869
Upper Sydney, Nova Scotia
DiedJuly 31, 1942(1942-07-31) (aged 72)
Political partyLiberal
CabinetMinister Without Portfolio (1917-1920)

Early life and education

Born in Upper North Sydney, Cape Breton County, Nova Scotia, Maclean was educated at Pictou Academy and Dalhousie University.

Career

A lawyer, practising in Lunenburg, Nova Scotia, Maclean first ran unsuccessfully for the House of Commons of Canada in the 1900 federal election for the electoral district of Lunenburg. In 1901, he was elected to the Nova Scotia House of Assembly for Lunenburg. A Nova Scotia Liberal, he served until 1904 when he was elected to the House of Commons representing Lunenburg.

He resigned as an MP in 1909, when he was re-elected to the House of Assembly and was appointed Attorney General and Commissioner of Crown Lands in the cabinet of George Henry Murray. He served until 1911, when he was elected again to the House of Commons for the electoral district of Halifax. As a result of the Conscription Crisis of 1917 he crossed the floor on October 10, 1917, to support the Unionist government of Sir Robert Laird Borden and was a minister without portfolio in the Cabinet. He left the government in 1920 and was re-elected as a Liberal in the 1921 general election.

He resigned his seat in 1923 to become President of the Exchequer Court of Canada, holding that position until his death. He also acted as an ad hoc judge at the Supreme Court of Canada, sitting 67 times during his career.[1]

His most significant decision is considered to be the one he wrote in R. v. Eastern Terminal Elevator Co.,[2] which was affirmed by the Supreme Court. Maclean's decision is generally considered to be highly competent, where the issue was well thought out and analyzed, in contrast with Duff J's subsequent opinion at the SCC.[3]

gollark: When stuff like this exists for a while it basically always gets random junk tacked on because someone thinks they need it.
gollark: IIRC an advantage of ARM used to be not having instruction-to-microinstruction conversion like x86 does, but I think their cores do that now.
gollark: I guess ARM has the "Thumb" thing.
gollark: Both are very CISCy.
gollark: Is ARM actually *that* different to x86 at this point?

References
  1. Bushnell 1997, p. 109
  2. [1924] ExCR 167
  3. Bushnell 1997, p. 106

Further reading
  • Ian Bushnell (1997). "11: The Maclean Years, 1923–1942". The Federal Court of Canada: A History, 1875-1992. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN 0-8020-4207-4. Retrieved 2013-01-06.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.