Adam Bamme

Adam Bamme (died 1397) was an English goldsmith and politician who served two non-consecutive terms as Lord Mayor of London in the 14th century.

Early career

Bamme's early origins are completely obscure, with nothing known about him prior to 1369.[1] A member of the Goldsmiths' Company, he gained a reputation for skillful workmanship that earned him a place as a chief supplier to the household of John of Gaunt.[1]

Marriages and family

Bamme is known to have married twice. His first wife, whom he married in 1375, was the widow of another goldsmith, while his second was a thrice-widowed, wealthy heiress, the daughter of John Stodeye, MP.[1] He had one son, Sir Richard Bamme, whose son in turn would serve as High Sheriff of Kent.[2] Another goldsmith, Henry Bamme, may have been his brother; the latter succeeded him as alderman of Aldersgate.[3]

Political career

Bamme held a variety of political offices over the course of his life. He was one of the Sheriffs of the City of London in 1382–3, and an alderman for, successively, Aldersgate Ward (1382–3), Cripplegate Ward (1384-5, 1387–8), Cheap Ward (1388–1393), and Lime Street Ward (1393 until his death).[1]

Bamme served his first term as mayor in 1390, succeeding William Venour. During this term, Bamme negotiated the purchase of a very large quantity of grain to store in anticipation of future shortages in the city.[4] This act was quite popular with the city's citizens, and helped gain Bamme a second term in 1397. Also during his first term, he issued a proclamation to silence the ongoing political dispute between the supporters of two previous mayors, Nicholas Brembre and John Northampton.[5]

Death

Bamme did not finish his second term as mayor. He died in office on 6 June 1397, and Richard II chose his replacement, Richard Whittington.[4][6] He was buried at St George Botolph Lane.[1]

gollark: It might actually be worse in that case, because at least for the universe thing you can just lean on the anthropic principle - if things *had* gone differently such that we did not exist, we would not be here to complain about it.
gollark: I am saying that gods are also complicated so this doesn't answer anything.
gollark: For purposes only, you understand.
gollark: There are lots of *imaginable* and *claimed* gods, so I'm saying "gods".
gollark: So basically, the "god must exist because the universe is complex" thing ignores the fact that it... isn't really... and that gods would be pretty complex too, and does not answer any questions usefully because it just pushes off the question of why things exist to why *god* exists.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.