Accreditation mill

An accreditation mill is an organization that purports to award educational accreditation to higher education institutions without having government authority or recognition from mainstream academia to operate as an accreditor. Implicit in the terminology is the assumption that the "mill" has low standards (or no standards) for such accreditation. Accreditation mills are much like diploma mills, and in many cases are closely associated with diploma mills. The "accreditation" they supply has no legal or academic value, but is used in diploma mill marketing to help attract students.[1]

Some institutions obtain accreditation from an independent group with low standards. In other cases, the institution sets up its own seemingly independent accreditation board and then accredits itself.[2] This gives the appearance that an outside group has approved the education that is offered at the school.

In many countries, accreditation is a government function. In the United States, governments normally do not accredit academic institutions, but federal education authorities recognize about 18 private accrediting organizations for institutional accreditation of higher education institutions[2] and more than 60 other private organizations for accreditation of specific educational programs.[3] While standards vary from organization to organization, without recognition from the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) (a non-governmental organization) or the United States Department of Education, the claims made by independent groups hold no value in the academic community.

Characteristics

CHEA has published a list of attributes of accreditation mills to help consumers identify them. According to CHEA, an accreditation operation might be a "mill" if it:[4]

  • Allows accreditation to be purchased
  • Allows institutions to attain accredited status in a very short period of time
  • Does not conduct site visits or interviews of key personnel as part of its accreditation process, instead reviewing institutions solely on the basis of submitted documents
  • Grants “permanent” accreditation, with no requirement for later periodic review
  • Claims recognition from an authority such as CHEA without appearing on lists of accreditors recognized by that authority
  • Has a name that is very similar to the name of a recognized accrediting organization
  • Publishes a list of institutions or programs that it has accredited without the knowledge of the listed institutions and programs
  • Publishes few or no standards for quality
  • Publishes claims for which there is no evidence.

Verifile's Accredibase notes that some accreditation mills do not reveal their locations, which makes it difficult to determine whether they are legitimate. Some other mills have been found to use the same addresses as the education providers that claim accreditation from them.[5]

Consumer information resources

To help consumers avoid diploma mills and accreditation mills, several national and international bodies publish lists of recognized accreditors and accredited educational institutions, as well as accreditors that are known to lack the necessary legal authority or recognition, and higher education providers known to lack accreditation.[1] The United States organization CHEA maintains an international directory of education ministries and other recognized higher education quality assurance bodies worldwide. The 2007 version of that directory lists 467 recognized bodies in 175 countries.[6]

A proposal for legislation that was announced in the U.S. House of Representatives in January 2010 would have inserted a definition of "accreditation mill" into U.S. law. The proposal, sponsored by Congressmen Timothy Bishop of New York and Michael Castle of Delaware, would have defined the term to mean "an education or corporate organization that offers a form of educational recognition or accreditation, for a fee or free of charge, that extend[s] a permanent recognition or accreditation status to an institution with few or no requirements for subsequent periodic reviews; (B) publish[es] a list of institutions and programs recognized or accredited by such organization that includes institutions and programs that did not apply for or otherwise request such recognition or accreditation by the organization; or (C) lack[s] national recognition by the Secretary of Education or the Council for Higher Education Accreditation."[7][8]

gollark: I only have 9 left, though...
gollark: For lighting.
gollark: I do, actually.
gollark: Cider128bit is very annoying.
gollark: Infinitely renewable, too, but in an *irritating* way.

See also

References
  1. Luca Lantero, Degree Mills: non-accredited and irregular higher education institutions Archived 2015-05-13 at the Wayback Machine, Information Centre on Academic Mobility and Equivalence (CIMEA), Italy.
  2. Diploma mills provide phony credentials, By Helena Andrews, The Capital Times/Medill News Service, February 14, 2005
  3. Recognized Accrediting Organizations (as of August 2010) Archived 2017-01-13 at the Wayback Machine, CHEA website, accessed November 21, 2010
  4. Important Questions About Accreditation, Degree Mills and Accreditation Mills (April 2005) Archived 2010-08-23 at the Wayback Machine, CHEA website, accessed November 21, 2010.
  5. Eyal Ben Cohen and Rachel Winch (Verifile Ltd.), Diploma and accreditation mills: Exposing academic credential abuse Archived March 15, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, 20 January 2010. Retrieved from UK Higher Education International Unit website, November 21, 2010.
  6. CHEA International Directory introduction Archived 2011-04-20 at the Wayback Machine, accessed November 21, 2010
  7. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/01/29/mills
  8. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-14. Retrieved 2010-11-21.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.