2018 Kunal Patel San Francisco Open – Singles

Zhang Ze was the defending champion but chose not to defend his title.

Singles
2018 Kunal Patel San Francisco Open
Champion Jason Jung
Runner-up Dominik Köpfer
Final score6–4, 2–6, 7–6(7–5)

Jason Jung won the title after defeating Dominik Köpfer 6–4, 2–6, 7–6(7–5) in the final.

Seeds

  1. Alexander Bublik (First round)
  2. Mackenzie McDonald (Second round)
  3. Michael Mmoh (Quarterfinals)
  4. Denis Kudla (Second round)
  5. Bradley Klahn (Quarterfinals)
  6. Noah Rubin (Quarterfinals)
  7. Filip Peliwo (Quarterfinals)
  8. Brayden Schnur (First round)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
  Dennis Novikov 3 1
Dominik Köpfer 6 6
  Dominik Köpfer 4 6 65
Jason Jung 6 2 77
  Miomir Kecmanović 65 6 2
Jason Jung 77 4 6

Top half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 A Bublik 610 6 2
D Novikov 712 3 6 D Novikov 5 6 6
Q Karue Sell 63 6 3 DE Galán 7 3 4
DE Galán 77 3 6 D Novikov 7 7
WC D Thomas 77 77 7 F Peliwo 5 5
A Collarini 64 64 WC D Thomas 3 2
Q M González 4 2 7 F Peliwo 6 6
7 F Peliwo 6 6 D Novikov 3 1
4 D Kudla 6 77 D Köpfer 6 6
A Pavić 4 64 4 D Kudla 63 3
D Köpfer 6 6 D Köpfer 77 6
J Šátral 2 2 D Köpfer 6 78
M Krueger 6 6 5 B Klahn 2 66
G Oliveira 3 4 M Krueger 77 4 4
M Arévalo 61 3 5 B Klahn 64 6 6
5 B Klahn 77 6

Bottom half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
8 B Schnur 4 62
M Kecmanović 6 77 M Kecmanović 6 78
Q JC Aragone 6 4 77 Q JC Aragone 4 66
M Giron 4 6 65 M Kecmanović 77 64 6
WC C Eubanks 77 4 3 M Mmoh 63 77 1
E Karlovskiy 64 3r WC C Eubanks 4 4
WC C Garín 2 3 3 M Mmoh 6 6
3 M Mmoh 6 6 M Kecmanović 65 6 2
6 N Rubin 6 3 J Jung 77 4 6
J Hernández-Fernández 1 0r 6 N Rubin 6 6
Q Jared Hiltzik 77 4 6 Q J Hiltzik 1 4
K Uchida 63 6 3 6 N Rubin 3 1
Í Cervantes 2 0 J Jung 6 6
J Jung 6 6 J Jung 1 77 6
WC F Lakat 4 4 2 M McDonald 6 63 2
2 M McDonald 6 6
gollark: My favourite esolang is probably Haskell.
gollark: I agree.
gollark: I prefer the set dictionaries.
gollark: ``` A language based on the idea of communism. There would be only one great editor (a wiki or similar) and all programmers would write only one big program that does everything. There would be only one datatype that fits everything, so everything belongs to one single class. Functional programming is clearly based on the idea of communism. It elevates functions (things that do the work) to first class citizens, and it is a utopian endeavor aimed at abolishing all states. It is seen as inefficient and unpopular, but always has die-hard defenders, mostly in academia. Besides, ML stands for Marxism-Leninism. Coincidence? I think not. It should be called Soviet Script and the one big program can be called the Universal Soviet Script Repository or USSR for short. And they put all the packages together in one place (Hackage). It already exists and is called 'Web'. It already exists and is called 'Emacs'. Emacs is the one great editor, and the one big program (Emacs can do almost anything). The language is Emacs Lisp, which is functional, and almost everything is a list (the one great datatype/class). Unfortunately```
gollark: It's pronounced Piephoon, by the way.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.