2018 Hungarian Pro Circuit Ladies Open – Doubles

Doubles
	2018 Hungarian Pro Circuit Ladies Open
Champions	Alexandra Cadanțu; Chantal Škamlová
Runners-up	Kaitlyn Christian ; Giuliana Olmos
Final score	6–1, 6–3

Mariana Duque Mariño and María Irigoyen were the defending champions, but Duque Mariño chose not to participate. Irigoyen partnered Danka Kovinić, but lost in the quarterfinals to Akgul Amanmuradova and Natela Dzalamidze.

Alexandra Cadanțu and Chantal Škamlová won the title, defeating Kaitlyn Christian and Giuliana Olmos in the final, 6–1, 6–3.

Seeds

Dalila Jakupović / Irina Khromacheva (First round)
Kaitlyn Christian / Giuliana Olmos (Final)
Cornelia Lister / Markéta Vondroušová (Quarterfinals)
María Irigoyen / Danka Kovinić (Quarterfinals)

Draw

Key

Draw

First Round					Quarterfinals					Semifinals					Final

1	D Jakupović I Khromacheva	3	6	[6]
	A Cadanțu C Škamlová	6	4	[10]		A Cadanțu C Škamlová	7	3	[13]
	RL Jani N Podoroska	2	6⁵			A Bondár P Udvardy	5	6	[11]
	A Bondár P Udvardy	6	7⁷								A Cadanțu C Škamlová	6	6
3	C Lister M Vondroušová	6	6								P Golubovskaya S Golubovskaya	3	4
WC	A Horváth R Zádori	0	0		3	C Lister M Vondroušová	4	6	[9]
	P Golubovskaya S Golubovskaya	6	6			P Golubovskaya S Golubovskaya	6	3	[11]
WC	R Fárbás L Nagymihály	2	3													A Cadanțu C Škamlová	6	6
	A Amanmuradova N Dzalamidze	6	6⁵	[14]											2	K Christian G Olmos	1	3
	D Evtimova K Stewart	3	7⁷	[12]		A Amanmuradova N Dzalamidze	7	7⁷
	A Fomina E Yashina	4	6³		4	M Irigoyen D Kovinić	5	6⁵
4	M Irigoyen D Kovinić	6	7⁷								A Amanmuradova N Dzalamidze	6	3	[2]
	A Panova G Voskoboeva	7	6							2	K Christian G Olmos	4	6	[10]
	Á Bukta D Gálfi	5	2			A Panova G Voskoboeva	5	6	[8]
	N Dascălu M Marfutina	2	3		2	K Christian G Olmos	7	3	[10]
2	K Christian G Olmos	6	6

gollark: I *will* continue use of `they`, for general convenience and the ability to conveniently ignore gender entirely.

gollark: Your criticism², while interesting, ultimately fails. Consider: you have *responded* to my criticism [see screenshot], despite claiming that this would not occur. This is an evident contradiction.It is also clear that, contra to your original claim #2, gollariosity has *increased* as a result of your actions.

gollark: I wholeheartedly disagree with removal of apioderivative words.1. This is dubious. Current research suggests nonlinear apioformic effects, where high use of apio-derived words leads to increased use due to memetic contamination, rather than a conserved/fixed level of apiodensity.2. I am, in any case, inevitable. Additionally, I do not consider this good.3. This appears to contradict #1 somewhat. We have also proven unable to displace the "apioform"/"bee" meme, despite previous attempts. If you want to remove it, come up with better memetics.

gollark: Wrong.

gollark: Did you know? There have been many incidents in the past where improper apiary safety protocols have lead to unbounded tetrational apiogenesis, also referred to as a VK-class "universal apiary" scenario. Often, the fallout from this needs to be cleaned up by moving all sentient entities into identical simulated universes, save for the incident occurring. This is known as "retroactive continuity", and modern apiaries' safety systems provide this functionality automatically.

References

Main Draw

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.