2017 San Luis Open Challenger Tour – Doubles

Doubles
	2017 San Luis Open Challenger Tour
Champions	Roberto Quiroz; Caio Zampieri
Runners-up	Hans Hach Verdugo; Adrián Menéndez-Maceiras
Final score	6–4, 6–2

Marcus Daniell and Artem Sitak were the defending champions but chose not to defend their title.

Roberto Quiroz and Caio Zampieri won the title after defeating Hans Hach Verdugo and Adrián Menéndez-Maceiras 6–4, 6–2 in the final.

Seeds

Marcelo Arévalo / Marcel Felder (Semifinals)
Evan King / Max Schnur (Semifinals)
Roberto Quiroz / Caio Zampieri (Champions)
Luca Margaroli / Mohamed Safwat (First round)

Draw

Key

First Round					Quarterfinals				Semifinals					Final


					1	M Arévalo M Felder	6	6
	P Krstin A Zlatanović				WC	LD Martínez L Patiño	4	1
WC	LD Martínez L Patiño	w/o							1	M Arévalo M Felder	6	2	[8]
4	L Margaroli M Safwat	6	3	[5]						H Hach Verdugo A Menéndez-Maceiras	2	6	[10]
	H Hach Verdugo A Menéndez-Maceiras	3	6	[10]		H Hach Verdugo A Menéndez-Maceiras	6	6
	F Argüello T Lipovsek Puches	6⁵	6	[7]		S Galdós JI Londero	2	2
	S Galdós JI Londero	7⁷	4	[10]											H Hach Verdugo A Menéndez-Maceiras	4	2
WC	Carlos de la Peña David Koch	2	1											3	R Quiroz C Zampieri	6	6
	A El Mihdawy I Endara	6	6			A El Mihdawy I Endara	3	1
	R Cid Subervi DE Galán	1	2		3	R Quiroz C Zampieri	6	6
3	R Quiroz C Zampieri	6	6						3	R Quiroz C Zampieri	6	6
WC	T Hank M Sánchez	6	5	[8]					2	E King M Schnur	4	3
	F de Paula A Velotti	3	7	[10]		F de Paula A Velotti
	H Podlipnik-Castillo M Zekić	3	4		2	E King M Schnur	w/o
2	E King M Schnur	6	6

gollark: i.e. demonstrate that they can actually function well, enforce the law reasonably, have reasonable laws *to* enforce in the first place, with available resources/data, **before** invading everyone's privacy with the insistence that they will totally make everyone safer.

gollark: Reduced privacy in return for more safety and stuff might be better if governments had a track record of, well, actually doing that sort of thing effectively.

gollark: I... see.

gollark: Invading people's privacy a lot allows you to get somewhat closer to "perfect enforcement".

gollark: Anyway, broadly speaking, governments *cannot* perfectly enforce their laws, and this is part of the reason they work generally somewhat okay. If they could *immediately* go from "government doesn't/does think you could do X" to "you can no longer do/not do X without punishment", we would likely have significantly less fair institutions.

References

Main Draw

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.