2017 Charlottesville Men's Pro Challenger – Singles

Reilly Opelka was the defending champion but lost in the first round to Tennys Sandgren.

Singles
2017 Charlottesville Men's Pro Challenger
Champion Tim Smyczek
Runner-up Tennys Sandgren
Final score6–7(5–7), 6–3, 6–2

Tim Smyczek won the title after defeating Tennys Sandgren 6–7(5–7), 6–3, 6–2 in the final.

Seeds

  1. Tennys Sandgren (Final)
  2. Henri Laaksonen (Quarterfinals, retired)
  3. Cameron Norrie (Second round)
  4. Ernesto Escobedo (Second round, retired)
  5. Bjorn Fratangelo (First round)
  6. Stefan Kozlov (Semifinals)
  7. Michael Mmoh (Semifinals)
  8. Tommy Paul (Second round)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
1 Tennys Sandgren 6 6
7 Michael Mmoh 4 4
1 Tennys Sandgren 77 3 2
Tim Smyczek 65 6 6
6 Stefan Kozlov 3 6 2
Tim Smyczek 6 2 6

Top half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 T Sandgren 6 6
R Opelka 3 4 1 T Sandgren 7 6
Q Alex Rybakov 4 4 F Horanský 5 3
F Horanský 6 6 1 T Sandgren 6 6
B Schnur 77 6 B Schnur 1 2
WC R Shane 64 4 B Schnur 6 6
K King 62 6 3 8 T Paul 3 4
8 T Paul 77 2 6 1 T Sandgren 6 6
3 C Norrie 6 6 7 M Mmoh 4 4
D Novikov 3 1 3 C Norrie 67 2
LL N Pauffley 64 2 Q R Roelofse 79 6
Q R Roelofse 77 6 Q R Roelofse 64 4
C Eubanks 711 6 7 M Mmoh 77 6
LL Samuel Monette 69 4 C Eubanks 77 3 4
M McDonald 1 62 7 M Mmoh 63 6 6
7 M Mmoh 6 77

Bottom half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
6 S Kozlov 6 3 6
WC T-S Kwiatkowski 1 6 3 6 S Kozlov 6 4 6
L Broady 7 64 6 L Broady 4 6 4
Q Jared Hiltzik 5 77 4 6 S Kozlov 6 6
D Kudla 6 6 D Kudla 4 3
WC JC Aragone 2 3 D Kudla 65 6 0
D Köpfer 1 6 5 4/WC E Escobedo 77 2 0r
4/WC E Escobedo 6 2 7 6 S Kozlov 3 6 2
5 B Fratangelo 78 77 T Smyczek 6 2 6
LL F Nielsen 66 63 5 B Fratangelo 1 2
M Moraing 3 6 3 T Smyczek 6 6
T Smyczek 6 3 6 T Smyczek 77 2
Q E Corrie 4 3 2 H Laaksonen 62 1r
F Peliwo 6 6 F Peliwo 6 2 2
M Giron 4 4 2 H Laaksonen 4 6 6
2 H Laaksonen 6 6
gollark: Would most *humans* actually know about the relevant foundations of arithmetic? I think that axiomatic set theory isn't that popular.
gollark: How can you tell what it doesn't understand except based on its inputs/outputs?
gollark: You're basically just assuming how it works internally in order to claim that it's doing certain things internally.
gollark: Really?
gollark: GPT-3 can sometimes do probably-novel logical reasoning. It has learned to do arithmetic despite being really poorly structured for it.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.