2017 Charlottesville Men's Pro Challenger – Singles
Reilly Opelka was the defending champion but lost in the first round to Tennys Sandgren.
Singles | |
---|---|
2017 Charlottesville Men's Pro Challenger | |
Champion | ![]() |
Runner-up | ![]() |
Final score | 6–7(5–7), 6–3, 6–2 |
Tim Smyczek won the title after defeating Tennys Sandgren 6–7(5–7), 6–3, 6–2 in the final.
Seeds
Tennys Sandgren (Final) Henri Laaksonen (Quarterfinals, retired) Cameron Norrie (Second round) Ernesto Escobedo (Second round, retired) Bjorn Fratangelo (First round) Stefan Kozlov (Semifinals) Michael Mmoh (Semifinals) Tommy Paul (Second round)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Finals
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||
1 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
7 | ![]() | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||
1 | ![]() | 77 | 3 | 2 | |||||||||
![]() | 65 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||
6 | ![]() | 3 | 6 | 2 | |||||||||
![]() | 6 | 2 | 6 | ||||||||||
Top half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 3 | 4 | 1 | ![]() | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() | 4 | 4 | ![]() | 5 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 6 | 1 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 77 | 6 | ![]() | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() | 64 | 4 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 62 | 6 | 3 | 8 | ![]() | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
8 | ![]() | 77 | 2 | 6 | 1 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | 7 | ![]() | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 3 | 1 | 3 | ![]() | 67 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
LL | ![]() | 64 | 2 | Q | ![]() | 79 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() | 77 | 6 | Q | ![]() | 64 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 711 | 6 | 7 | ![]() | 77 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
LL | ![]() | 69 | 4 | ![]() | 77 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 1 | 62 | 7 | ![]() | 63 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
7 | ![]() | 6 | 77 |
Bottom half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | ![]() | 6 | 3 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() | 1 | 6 | 3 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 4 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 7 | 64 | 6 | ![]() | 4 | 6 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() | 5 | 77 | 4 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() | 2 | 3 | ![]() | 65 | 6 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 1 | 6 | 5 | 4/WC | ![]() | 77 | 2 | 0r | |||||||||||||||||||
4/WC | ![]() | 6 | 2 | 7 | 6 | ![]() | 3 | 6 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
5 | ![]() | 78 | 77 | ![]() | 6 | 2 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LL | ![]() | 66 | 63 | 5 | ![]() | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 3 | 6 | 3 | ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 3 | 6 | ![]() | 77 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q | ![]() | 4 | 3 | 2 | ![]() | 62 | 1r | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() | 6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | 4 | 4 | 2 | ![]() | 4 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() | 6 | 6 |
gollark: Would most *humans* actually know about the relevant foundations of arithmetic? I think that axiomatic set theory isn't that popular.
gollark: How can you tell what it doesn't understand except based on its inputs/outputs?
gollark: You're basically just assuming how it works internally in order to claim that it's doing certain things internally.
gollark: Really?
gollark: GPT-3 can sometimes do probably-novel logical reasoning. It has learned to do arithmetic despite being really poorly structured for it.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.