2016 The Hague Open – Singles

Nikoloz Basilashvili was the defending champion but chose not to defend his title.

Singles
2016 The Hague Open
Champion Robin Haase
Runner-up Adam Pavlásek
Final score6–4, 6–7(9–11), 6–2

Robin Haase won the title after defeating Adam Pavlásek 6–4, 6–7(9–11), 6–2 in the final.

Seeds

  1. Gastão Elias (Withdrew)
  2. Íñigo Cervantes (Second round)
  3. Facundo Bagnis (Second round)
  4. Robin Haase (Champion)
  5. Renzo Olivo (First round)
  6. Igor Sijsling (First round)
  7. Adam Pavlásek (Final)
  8. Daniel Muñoz de la Nava (First round)
  9. Constant Lestienne (Semifinals)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
9 Constant Lestienne 3 3
4 Robin Haase 6 6
4 Robin Haase 6 69 6
7 Adam Pavlásek 4 711 2
7 Adam Pavlásek 78 6
Yannik Reuter 66 4

Top half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
9 C Lestienne 3 6 6
Robin Staněk 6 4 0 9 C Lestienne 6 6
A Velotti 3 4 WC J Huta Galung 2 1
WC J Huta Galung 6 6 9 C Lestienne 6 6
B Trinker 7 3 1 PR B Westerhof 4 3
PR B Westerhof 5 6 6 PR B Westerhof 6 6
P Krstin 7 6 P Krstin 3 4
8 D Muñoz de la Nava 5 3 9 C Lestienne 3 3
4 R Haase 7 6 4 R Haase 6 6
P Riba 5 4 4 R Haase 6 1 6
WC S Tsitsipas 77 77 WC S Tsitsipas 4 6 1
LL Gibril Diarra 64 62 4 R Haase 6 6
K Majchrzak 6 7 A Vatutin 1 1
S Griekspoor 2 5 K Majchrzak 7 65 1
A Vatutin 7 2 6 A Vatutin 5 77 6
5 R Olivo 5 6 0

Bottom half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
7 A Pavlásek 6 3 6
Q Juan Ignacio Galarza 3 6 3 7 A Pavlásek 6 6
Q George von Massow 6 2 5 Q P Torebko 3 2
Q P Torebko 2 6 7 7 A Pavlásek 4 7 6
WC T Griekspoor 3 6 6 WC T Griekspoor 6 5 3
G Lapentti 6 2 2 WC T Griekspoor 77 6
A van der Duim 2 3 3 F Bagnis 64 4
3 F Bagnis 6 6 7 A Pavlásek 78 6
6 I Sijsling 6 1 4 Y Reuter 66 4
G Sakharov 2 6 6 G Sakharov 6 4 4
A Smirnov 2 1 P Sousa 2 6 6
P Sousa 6 6 P Sousa 6 4 4
Yannik Reuter 77 7 Y Reuter 2 6 6
Q A Hoang 63 5 Y Reuter 77 77
WC T van Rijthoven 6 3 4 2 Í Cervantes 64 64
2 Í Cervantes 2 6 6
gollark: "How come you get *two* planets to live on? I need three!"
gollark: Post-scarcity probably never since people will always want *some* other thing.
gollark: Since healthcare does require resources, it's more "paid for by someone else" than "actually free". But the US's system is so bad that that could probably work better and more cheaply *anyway*.
gollark: You can split it into threes by drawing lines from the points to the centre.
gollark: But people just might not be ready.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.