2016 Blossom Cup – Doubles
Eri Hozumi and Makoto Ninomiya were the defending champions, but Hozumi chose to participate in Canberra instead. Ninomiya partnered Shuko Aoyama and successfully defended her title, they defeated Chinese wildcards Lu Jingjing and Zhang Yuxuan in the final, 6–3, 6–0.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2016 Blossom Cup | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 6–3, 6–0 |
Seeds
Shuko Aoyama / Makoto Ninomiya (Champions) Elise Mertens / Emily Webley-Smith (First round) Chan Chin-wei / Liu Chang (Quarterfinals) Hiroko Kuwata / Kotomi Takahata (Semifinals)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
First round | Quarterfinals | Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 0 | 1 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 4 | 3 | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 2 | 4 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 66 | [5] | WC | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 78 | [10] | 1 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [8] | WC | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
WC | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [10] | WC | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 78 | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 2 | 5 | 3 | ![]() ![]() | 3 | 66 | |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 7 | WC | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [10] | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 6 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | [8] | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 3 | 2 | ![]() ![]() | 64 | 6 | [6] | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() | 6 | 2 | [10] | ![]() ![]() | 77 | 4 | [10] | ||||||||||||||||||||
2 | ![]() ![]() | 1 | 6 | [3] |
gollark: mgollark is milligollark.
gollark: Their 117-million-parameter mind is too small to contain true gollariosity.
gollark: No, this is merely mgollark's insanity showing.
gollark: > The only thing I can do is use C, but it's not like Rust is particularly excellent and amazing.OH BEE OH BEE IT NEEDS RETRAINING
gollark: > , yes.<|endoftext|>It's a shame that many languages have weird implicit typing.<|endoftext|>The only thing I can do is use C, but it's not like Rust is particularly excellent and amazing.<|endoftext|>The language is very hostile to abstraction and stuff, as far as I know.<|endoftext|>I think it's a good way to write C.<|endoftext|>It was a good job of some kind to push the language to write C.<|endoftext|>We had that one yesterday, yes.<|endoftext|>It is not a good reason to write C.<|endoftext|>Apparently the actual language is now overcrowded because of its 900-letter TLDs.<|endoftext|>It's a shame that the platform doesn't match the original definition you want to use the actual *C*.<|endoftext|>No, it's a *c*.<|endoftext|>It would be better if it used actual definition of `set shell.<|endoftext|>What?<|endoftext|>https://github.com/dangr/fastcNONE are safe from gollarious emulation.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.