2015 Open Féminin de Marseille – Singles

Alexandra Dulgheru was the defending champion, but chose not to participate.

Singles
2015 Open Féminin de Marseille
Champion Monica Niculescu
Runner-up Pauline Parmentier
Final score6–2, 7–5

Monica Niculescu won the title, defeating Pauline Parmentier in the final, 6–2, 7–5.

Seeds

  1. Kaia Kanepi (First round)
  2. Monica Niculescu (Champion)
  3. Tatjana Maria (First round)
  4. Polona Hercog (Quarterfinals)
  5. Aleksandra Krunić (Second round)
  6. Denisa Allertová (Quarterfinals)
  7. Evgeniya Rodina (First round)
  8. Pauline Parmentier (Final)

Main draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
8 Pauline Parmentier 4 6 6
  Kateryna Bondarenko 6 4 2
8 Pauline Parmentier 2 5
2 Monica Niculescu 6 7
  Mariana Duque 3 6 3
2 Monica Niculescu 6 3 6

Top half

First round Second round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 K Kanepi 3 7 2
  A Sasnovich 6 5 6 A Sasnovich 64 63
WC C de Bernardi 3 2 WC C Paquet 77 77
WC C Paquet 6 6 WC C Paquet 4 4
WC A Hesse 6 3 6 8 P Parmentier 6 6
WC C Roméo 1 6 2 WC A Hesse 1 2
  PM Țig 1r 8 P Parmentier 6 6
8 P Parmentier 3 8 P Parmentier 4 6 6
4 P Hercog 6 6 K Bondarenko 6 4 2
  Y Wang 4 0 4 P Hercog 6 6
  M Zanevska 6 3 7 M Zanevska 3 0
  S Vögele 3 6 5 4 P Hercog 1 3
  A Tatishvili 2 3 K Bondarenko 6 6
  K Bondarenko 6 6 K Bondarenko 6 6
  A Panova 6 6 A Panova 2 1
7 E Rodina 4 2

Bottom half

First round Second round Quarterfinals Semifinals
5 A Krunić 6 6
Q O Kalashnikova 3 2 5 A Krunić 2 3
  M Duque 6 5 6 M Duque 6 6
  R Hogenkamp 3 7 4 M Duque 6 6
  A Muhammad 6 2 4 Q A Sevastova 1 4
  V Cepede Royg 1 6 6 V Cepede Royg 6 4 3
Q A Sevastova 77 6 Q A Sevastova 1 6 6
3 T Maria 60 1 M Duque 3 6 3
6 D Allertová 5 6 6 2 M Niculescu 6 3 6
  L Domínguez Lino 7 1 1 6 D Allertová 3 77 6
  J Čepelová 77 6 J Čepelová 6 63 4
Q C Sibille 65 4 6 D Allertová 2 5
Q A Lim 6 2 3 2 M Niculescu 6 7
  S Vickery 0 6 6 S Vickery 2 78 4
  F Abanda 3 63 2 M Niculescu 6 66 6
2 M Niculescu 6 77
gollark: These are just slight variations on existing animals.
gollark: I don't think this is true, except in a very broadly defined sense.
gollark: If *evolution*... well, "attempts" would be anthropomorphizing it... to cross said chasm, all it can do is just throw broken ones at it repeatedly with no understanding, and select for better ones until one actually sticks.
gollark: If I want to cross a chasm with a bridge, or something, I can draw on my limited knowledge of physics and materials science and whatever and put together a somewhat sensible prototype, then make inferences from what happens to it, and get something working out.
gollark: No. We can reason about problems in various ways. So can some animals.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.