2011 ATP World Tour Finals – Doubles
Daniel Nestor and Nenad Zimonjić were the defending champions, but they split in 2011. Daniel Nestor qualified with his new partner Max Mirnyi and Nenad Zimonjić with Michaël Llodra.
Daniel Nestor and Max Mirnyi won the final 7–5, 6–3, against Mariusz Fyrstenberg and Marcin Matkowski.
Doubles | |
---|---|
2011 ATP World Tour Finals | |
Champions | ![]() ![]() |
Runners-up | ![]() ![]() |
Final score | 7–5, 6–3 |
Seeds
Bob Bryan / Mike Bryan (Semifinals) Michaël Llodra / Nenad Zimonjić (Round Robin) Max Mirnyi / Daniel Nestor (Champions) Mahesh Bhupathi / Leander Paes (Semifinals) Rohan Bopanna / Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi (Round Robin) Robert Lindstedt / Horia Tecău (Round Robin) Jürgen Melzer / Philipp Petzschner (Round Robin) Mariusz Fyrstenberg / Marcin Matkowski (Final)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Finals
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||
4 | ![]() ![]() | 4 | 6 | [6] | |||||||||
8 | ![]() ![]() | 6 | 4 | [10] | |||||||||
8 | ![]() ![]() | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||
3 | ![]() ![]() | 78 | 6 | ||||||||||
1 | ![]() ![]() | 66 | 4 | ||||||||||
Group A
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
RR W–L | Set W–L | Game W–L | Standings | ||
1 | ![]() ![]() |
4–6, 2–6 | 6–1, 6–2 | 6–7(4–7), 7–5, [10–7] | 2–1 | 4–3 (57.1%) | 32–27 (54.2%) | 2 | |
4 | ![]() ![]() |
6–4, 6–2 | 6–7(6–8), 1–6 | 7–5, 6–3 | 2–1 | 4–2 (66.7%) | 32–27 (54.2%) | 1 | |
6 | ![]() ![]() |
1–6, 2–6 | 7–6(8–6), 6–1 | 3–6, 4–6 | 1–2 | 2–4 (33.3%) | 23–31 (42.6%) | 4 | |
7 | ![]() ![]() |
7–6(7–4), 5–7, [7–10] | 5–7, 3–6 | 6–3, 6–4 | 1–2 | 3–4 (42.9%) | 32–34 (48.5%) | 3 |
Standings are determined by: 1) Number of wins; 2) Number of matches; 3) In two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4) In three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5) Steering Committee decision.
Group B
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
RR W–L | Set W–L | Game W–L | Standings | ||
2 | ![]() ![]() |
6–4, 3–6, [7–10] | 7–6(8–6), 6–3 | 4–6, 7–5, [9–11] | 1–2 | 4–4 (50.0%) | 33–32 (50.8%) | 3 | |
3 | ![]() ![]() |
4–6, 6–3, [10–7] | 7–6(7–2), 4–6, [11–9] | 6–4, 6–3 | 3–0 | 6–2 (75.0%) | 35–28 (55.5%) | 1 | |
5 | ![]() ![]() |
6–7(6–8), 3–6 | 6–7(2–7), 6–4, [9–11] | 2–6, 1–6 | 0–3 | 1–6 (14.3%) | 24–37 (39.3%) | 4 | |
8 | ![]() ![]() |
6–4, 5–7, [11–9] | 4–6, 3–6 | 6–2, 6–1 | 2–1 | 4–3 (57.1%) | 31–26 (54.4%) | 2 |
Standings are determined by: 1) Number of wins; 2) Number of matches; 3) In two-players-ties, head-to-head records; 4) In three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, or of games won; 5) Steering Committee decision.
gollark: I think most sane people agree that backdoors are bad at this point.
gollark: In the UK the police apparently *can* legally compel you to give up your passwords because UK.
gollark: Anyway, I think if you use standard and generally-considered-good cryptographic algorithms with trusted open-source implementations you're probably okay. Unless you're being actively, personally targeted by nation-states. In which case you have bigger problems.
gollark: Like I said, they can't practically ban strong encryption, just make it so that the average people's communications don't use it.
gollark: Then, anyone who uses strong crypto can be called an evil terrorist because all Good Citizens are using backdoored stuff.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.