2010 Nielsen Pro Tennis Championship – Singles

Alex Kuznetsov was the defender of championship title, but he lost to Michael Russell in the first round.
Brian Dabul defeated Tim Smyczek 6–1, 1–6, 6–1 in the final.

Singles
2010 Nielsen Pro Tennis Championship
Champion Brian Dabul
Runner-up Tim Smyczek
Final score6–1, 1–6, 6–1

Seeds

  1. Björn Phau (Quarterfinal)
  2. Michael Russell (Semifinal)
  3. Somdev Devvarman (First Round)
  4. Brian Dabul (Champion)
  5. Donald Young (Semifinal)
  6. Édouard Roger-Vasselin (First Round)
  7. Go Soeda (Second Round)
  8. Kevin Kim (Second Round)

Draw

Key

Finals

Semifinals Final
          
  Tim Smyczek 6 6  
5 Donald Young 4 2  
  Tim Smyczek 1 6 1
4 Brian Dabul 6 1 6
4 Brian Dabul 6 6  
2 Michael Russell 1 4  

Top Half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 B Phau 6 7  
  B Reynolds 4 64   1 B Phau 4 6 6
Q P-L Duclos 7 0 6 Q P-L Duclos 6 1 3
  V Estrella 64 6 4 1 B Phau 5 6 0
  J Witten 1 4     T Smyczek 7 2 6
  T Smyczek 6 6     T Smyczek 6 6  
Q A Sitak 1 2   8 K Kim 4 1  
8 K Kim 6 6     T Smyczek 6 6  
3 S Devvarman 6 3 4 5 D Young 4 2  
  L Cook 4 6 6   L Cook 6 6  
Q F Wolmarans 7 6   Q F Wolmarans 2 3  
  I Merwe 68 4     L Cook 63 1  
WC A Krajicek 3 2   5 D Young 7 6  
WC S Stadler 6 6   WC S Stadler 3 5  
WC R Harrison 3 2   5 D Young 6 7  
5 D Young 6 6  

Bottom Half

First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
6 É Roger-Vasselin 7 3 3
  P Polansky 5 6 6   P Polansky 6 2 3
  T Ito 1 2   Q M Raonic 3 6 6
Q M Raonic 6 6   Q M Raonic 7 3 4
  A Begemann 6 6   4 B Dabul 5 6 6
  M Yani 3 4     A Begemann 2 0  
WC JP Fruttero 4 3   4 B Dabul 6 6  
4 B Dabul 6 6   4 B Dabul 6 6  
7 G Soeda 7 6   2 M Russell 1 4  
  R DeHeart 67 1   7 G Soeda 4 4  
  R de Voest 6 6     R de Voest 6 6  
  A Peya 2 1     R de Voest 6 4 3
ALT N Okun 64 3   2 M Russell 4 6 6
  A Brugués-Davi 7 6     A Brugués-Davi 2 0  
  A Kuznetsov 4 2   2 M Russell 6 6  
2 M Russell 6 6  
gollark: Receive solution from the future, check if it's correct, if it is then send it back so it's received.
gollark: For problems which are easy to check and hard to solve.
gollark: If time travel requires "fixed history", then you can use the universe's built in paradox resolver magic thing to either do your computation for you, or cause bizarre failure modes.
gollark: Actually, it's even better.
gollark: Different parts of it will be simulated at different times, but that's not detectable since the simulation of it outputs the same stuff.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.