2010 Newfoundland and Labrador Scotties Tournament of Hearts
The 2010 Newfoundland and Labrador Scotties Tournament of Hearts was held January 6-10 at the ReMax Centre in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador.[1] The winning team, led by Shelley Nichols, represented Newfoundland and Labrador at the 2010 Scotties Tournament of Hearts in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.
2010 Newfoundland and Labrador Scotties Tournament of Hearts | |
---|---|
Host city | St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador |
Arena | ReMax Centre |
Dates | January 6–10, 2010 |
Winner | Team Nichols |
Curling club | ReMax Centre, St. John's |
Skip | Shelley Nichols |
Third | Steph LeDrew |
Second | Rhonda Rogers |
Lead | Colette Lemon |
Finalist | Heather Strong |
« 2009 2011 » |
Teams
Skip | Third | Second | Lead | Club |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stacie Devereaux | Stephanie Guzzwell | Sarah Paul | Heather Martin | Bally Haly Golf and Curling Club, St. John's |
Susan Hannan | Amy MacIntyre | Paula French | Lacey Seamone | ReMax Centre, St. John's |
Cindy Miller | Beth Hamilton | Noelle Thomas | Adrienne Mercer | Bally Haly Golf and Curling Club, St. John's |
Shelley Nichols | Steph LeDrew | Rhonda Rogers | Colette Lemon | ReMax Centre, St. John's |
Laura Phillips | Dianne Ryan | Marian Dawe | Jeanette Hodder | ReMax Centre, St. John's |
Heather Strong | Cathy Cunningham | Laura Strong | Peg Goss | ReMax Centre, St. John's |
Standings
Skip (Club) | W | L | PF | PA | Ends Won |
Ends Lost |
Blank Ends |
Stolen Ends |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shelley Nichols (Bally Haly) | 5 | 0 | 45 | 30 | 25 | 19 | 1 | 7 |
Stacie Devereaux (Bally Haly) | 4 | 1 | 45 | 24 | 20 | 16 | 4 | 4 |
Heather Strong (ReMax) | 3 | 2 | 39 | 27 | 22 | 16 | 3 | 7 |
Laura Phillips (ReMax) | 2 | 3 | 34 | 36 | 20 | 21 | 4 | 4 |
Cindy Miller (Bally Haly) | 1 | 4 | 17 | 38 | 14 | 22 | 6 | 4 |
Susan Hannan (ReMax) | 0 | 5 | 19 | 44 | 15 | 22 | 4 | 6 |
Results
Draw 1
January 6, 1:30 PM
Sheet 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Phillips | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | X | 6 |
Strong ![]() |
1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | X | 10 |
Sheet 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Nichols ![]() |
3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | X | X | 11 |
Hannan | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | X | X | 4 |
Sheet 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Devereaux ![]() |
0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 | X | X | X | 12 |
Miller | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | X | X | X | 3 |
Draw 2
January 6, 7:30 PM
Sheet 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Phillips | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
Nichols ![]() |
3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
Sheet 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Hannan ![]() |
0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Miller | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
Sheet 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Strong | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | X | 6 |
Devereaux ![]() |
2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | X | 8 |
Draw 3
January 7, 9:30 AM
Sheet 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Strong | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | X | X | 8 |
Miller ![]() |
0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | X | X | 2 |
Sheet 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Nichols ![]() |
1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | X | 8 |
Devereaux | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | X | 6 |
Sheet 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Phillips ![]() |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
Hannan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
Draw 4
January 7, 3:30 PM
Sheet 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Strong ![]() |
2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | X | X | X | X | 8 |
Hannan | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | X | X | X | X | 2 |
Sheet 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Nichols | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | X | 7 |
Miller ![]() |
2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | X | 4 |
Sheet 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Phillips ![]() |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | X | X | 4 |
Devereaux | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | X | X | 9 |
Draw 5
January 8, 9:30 AM
Sheet 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Hannan | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | X | X | X | 3 |
Devereaux ![]() |
0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | X | X | X | 10 |
Sheet 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Phillips ![]() |
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | X | X | 7 |
Miller | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | X | X | 1 |
Sheet 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Strong | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | X | 7 |
Nichols ![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | X | 9 |
Playoffs
Semifinal | Final 1 | Final 2 | |||||||||||
1 | Shelley Nichols | 9 | |||||||||||
2 | Stacie Devereaux | 3 | 3 | Heather Strong | 8 | ||||||||
3 | Heather Strong | 10 | 1 | Shelley Nichols | 3 | ||||||||
3 | Heather Strong | 6 | |||||||||||
Semifinal
January 8, 7:30 PM
Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Stacie Devereaux ![]() |
0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | X | 3 |
Heather Strong | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | X | 10 |
Final
January 9, 1:00 PM
Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Final |
Shelley Nichols ![]() |
0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | X | 3 |
Heather Strong | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | X | 6 |
Final 2
January 9, 7:30 PM
Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Final |
Shelley Nichols** ![]() |
0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
Heather Strong | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
** Nichols must be beaten twice
gollark: How would that help? You would just get hotter.
gollark: You would probably have to swap out a bunch of important proteins to make everything work. Which would be hard, as lots of them are probably ridiculously optimized for their current function.
gollark: Does it matter? In most contexts where you *need* to know if something is "alive" there's probably a more specific definition which categorises them better.
gollark: Apparently old pacemakers ran on small RTGs, but people are too uncool to do that nowadays I think.
gollark: > I wonder if it would be possible to engineer a contagious bacteria with rapid reproductive rates to produce a fast acting psychoactive compound when undergoing cellular division, similar to how cholera produces cholera toxin. It would be an interesting non lethal bio weapon that could incapacitate enemy forces in a few hoursIt seems like it's getting cheaper and easier for people to genetically engineer bacteria and stuff, so I worry that within a few decades it will be easy enough that people will just do this sort of thing for funlolz.
References
- "Newfoundland and Labrador Curling Association". Curlingnl.ca. Retrieved 2013-11-03.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.