2010 Newfoundland and Labrador Scotties Tournament of Hearts

The 2010 Newfoundland and Labrador Scotties Tournament of Hearts was held January 6-10 at the ReMax Centre in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador.[1] The winning team, led by Shelley Nichols, represented Newfoundland and Labrador at the 2010 Scotties Tournament of Hearts in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.

2010 Newfoundland and Labrador
Scotties Tournament of Hearts
Host citySt. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador
ArenaReMax Centre
DatesJanuary 6–10, 2010
WinnerTeam Nichols
Curling clubReMax Centre, St. John's
SkipShelley Nichols
ThirdSteph LeDrew
SecondRhonda Rogers
LeadColette Lemon
FinalistHeather Strong
« 2009
2011 »

Teams

Skip Third Second Lead Club
Stacie DevereauxStephanie GuzzwellSarah PaulHeather MartinBally Haly Golf and Curling Club, St. John's
Susan HannanAmy MacIntyrePaula FrenchLacey SeamoneReMax Centre, St. John's
Cindy MillerBeth HamiltonNoelle ThomasAdrienne MercerBally Haly Golf and Curling Club, St. John's
Shelley NicholsSteph LeDrewRhonda RogersColette LemonReMax Centre, St. John's
Laura PhillipsDianne RyanMarian DaweJeanette HodderReMax Centre, St. John's
Heather StrongCathy CunninghamLaura StrongPeg GossReMax Centre, St. John's

Standings

Skip (Club) W L PF PA Ends
Won
Ends
Lost
Blank
Ends
Stolen
Ends
Shelley Nichols (Bally Haly)504530251917
Stacie Devereaux (Bally Haly)414524201644
Heather Strong (ReMax)323927221637
Laura Phillips (ReMax)233436202144
Cindy Miller (Bally Haly)141738142264
Susan Hannan (ReMax)051944152246

Results

Draw 1

January 6, 1:30 PM

Sheet 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Phillips 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 X 6
Strong 1 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 3 X 10
Sheet 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Nichols 3 0 2 0 0 1 3 2 X X 11
Hannan 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 X X 4
Sheet 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Devereaux 0 3 0 1 3 0 5 X X X 12
Miller 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 X X X 3

Draw 2

January 6, 7:30 PM

Sheet 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Phillips 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 3 0 9
Nichols 3 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 10
Sheet 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Hannan 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4
Miller 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 2 7
Sheet 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Strong 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 X 6
Devereaux 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 X 8

Draw 3

January 7, 9:30 AM

Sheet 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Strong 0 0 2 1 0 3 1 1 X X 8
Miller 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 X X 2
Sheet 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Nichols 1 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 X 8
Devereaux 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 0 X 6
Sheet 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Phillips 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 8
Hannan 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 0 6

Draw 4

January 7, 3:30 PM

Sheet 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Strong 2 0 0 3 1 2 X X X X 8
Hannan 0 1 1 0 0 0 X X X X 2
Sheet 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Nichols 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 X 7
Miller 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 X 4
Sheet 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Phillips 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 X X 4
Devereaux 0 1 1 2 0 3 0 2 X X 9

Draw 5

January 8, 9:30 AM

Sheet 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Hannan 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 X X X 3
Devereaux 0 2 0 4 0 0 4 X X X 10
Sheet 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Phillips 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 X X 7
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 X X 1
Sheet 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Strong 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 2 1 X 7
Nichols 2 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 X 9

Playoffs

Semifinal Final 1 Final 2
     
             
             
          1 Shelley Nichols 9
2 Stacie Devereaux 3       3 Heather Strong 8
3 Heather Strong 10     1 Shelley Nichols 3
        3 Heather Strong 6    
     


Semifinal

January 8, 7:30 PM

Team 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Stacie Devereaux 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 X 3
Heather Strong 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 2 X 10

Final

January 9, 1:00 PM

Team 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Final
Shelley Nichols 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 X 3
Heather Strong 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 X 6

Final 2

January 9, 7:30 PM

Team 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Final
Shelley Nichols** 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 9
Heather Strong 1 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 8

** Nichols must be beaten twice

gollark: How would that help? You would just get hotter.
gollark: You would probably have to swap out a bunch of important proteins to make everything work. Which would be hard, as lots of them are probably ridiculously optimized for their current function.
gollark: Does it matter? In most contexts where you *need* to know if something is "alive" there's probably a more specific definition which categorises them better.
gollark: Apparently old pacemakers ran on small RTGs, but people are too uncool to do that nowadays I think.
gollark: > I wonder if it would be possible to engineer a contagious bacteria with rapid reproductive rates to produce a fast acting psychoactive compound when undergoing cellular division, similar to how cholera produces cholera toxin. It would be an interesting non lethal bio weapon that could incapacitate enemy forces in a few hoursIt seems like it's getting cheaper and easier for people to genetically engineer bacteria and stuff, so I worry that within a few decades it will be easy enough that people will just do this sort of thing for funlolz.

References

  1. "Newfoundland and Labrador Curling Association". Curlingnl.ca. Retrieved 2013-11-03.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.