2010 China Open – Men's Singles

Novak Djokovic was the defending champion and defended his title, defeating David Ferrer 6–2, 6–4 in the final.

Men's Singles
2010 China Open
Champion Novak Djokovic
Runner-up David Ferrer
Final score6–2, 6–4
Main article: 2010 China Open (tennis)

Seeds
  1. Novak Djokovic (Champion)
  2. Andy Murray (Quarterfinals)
  3. Robin Söderling (Quarterfinals)
  4. Nikolay Davydenko (Quarterfinals)
  5. Tomáš Berdych (First Round)
  6. Fernando Verdasco (First Round)
  7. Mikhail Youzhny (First Round)
  8. David Ferrer (Final)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
1 Novak Djokovic 77 6  
WC John Isner 61 2  
1 Novak Djokovic 6 6  
8 David Ferrer 2 4  
8 David Ferrer 6 4 6
  Ivan Ljubičić 4 6 4

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 N Djokovic 6 6  
WC M Gong 1 3   1 N Djokovic w/o    
  M Fish 6 77     M Fish      
  J Tipsarević 2 65   1 N Djokovic 6 6  
  G Simon 6 3 6   G Simon 3 2  
  S Querrey 3 6 2   G Simon 66 6 77
Q M Berrer 4 7 6 Q M Berrer 78 4 64
5 T Berdych 6 5 4 1 N Djokovic 77 6  
4 N Davydenko 6 6   WC J Isner 61 2  
  F Mayer 3 4   4 N Davydenko 7 7  
M Čilić 6 6     M Čilić 5 5  
  T Bellucci 2 2   4 N Davydenko 62 4  
WC J Isner 77 6   WC J Isner 77 6  
WC T-h Yang 65 3   WC J Isner 77 3 6
  P Kohlschreiber 6 7     P Kohlschreiber 63 6 3
6 F Verdasco 2 5  

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
8 D Ferrer 6 6  
  D Istomin 4 1   8 D Ferrer 6 3 6
Q I Marchenko 4 67     Y-h Lu 3 6 1
  Y-h Lu 6 79   8 D Ferrer 6 6  
  N Almagro 7 6   3 R Söderling 2 4  
Q Ł Kubot 5 2     N Almagro 5 6 3
  T Robredo 6 1 4 3 R Söderling 7 4 6
3 R Söderling 4 6 6 8 D Ferrer 6 4 6
7 M Youzhny 3 63     I Ljubičić 4 6 4
  I Ljubičić 6 77     I Ljubičić 6 77  
  A Dolgopolov 6 6     A Dolgopolov 3 62  
  M Baghdatis 4 4     I Ljubičić 6 6  
A Golubev 2 0r 2 A Murray 3 2  
  A Montañés 6 3     A Montañés 5 3  
Q P-H Mathieu 2 3   2 A Murray 7 6  
2 A Murray 6 6  
gollark: Consider: in our modern economy, there are probably around (order of magnitude) a hundred million different sorts of thing people or organizations might need.
gollark: So you have to *vote* on who gets everything?
gollark: If you have some random authority decide who needs them, then... well, that won't really work very well - it doesn't scale to more complex things than allocating one resource, and that is obviously uncool central power.
gollark: If you just *ask*, everyone will go "yes, I really need a bee".
gollark: There is a difference between "want" and "need", and making it actually cost something to get something makes that more meaningful.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.