2009 Big East Women's Basketball Tournament
The 2009 Big East Women's Basketball Tournament took place in March 2009 at the XL Center in Hartford, Connecticut. The Connecticut Huskies defeated the Louisville Cardinals 75-36 in the tournament finals to receive the Big East Conference's automatic bid to the 2009 NCAA Tournament. This was the first Big East tournament to include all 16 of the conference's teams. The teams finishing 9 through 16 in the regular season standings played first-round games, while teams 5 through 8 received byes to the second round. The top 4 teams during the regular season received double-byes to the quarterfinals.
Bracket
First Round Friday, March 6 |
Second Round Saturday, March 7 |
Quarterfinals Sunday, March 8 |
Semifinals Monday, March 9 | |||||||||||||||
12 | Syracuse | 61 | ||||||||||||||||
13 | St. John's | 63 | 13 | St. John's | 45 | |||||||||||||
5 | Notre Dame | 62 | ||||||||||||||||
5 | Notre Dame | 47 | ||||||||||||||||
4 | Villanova | 58 | ||||||||||||||||
4 | Villanova | 42 | ||||||||||||||||
9 | Marquette | 54 | 1 | Connecticut | 72 | |||||||||||||
16 | Cincinnati | 60OT | 16 | Cincinnati | 58 | |||||||||||||
8 | South Florida | 68 | ||||||||||||||||
8 | South Florida | 42 | ||||||||||||||||
1 | Connecticut | 79 | ||||||||||||||||
First Round Friday, March 6 |
Second Round Saturday, March 7 |
Quarterfinals Sunday, March 8 |
Semifinals Monday, March 9 | |||||||||||||||
10 | Georgetown | 45 | ||||||||||||||||
15 | Seton Hall | 70 | 15 | Seton Hall | 45 | |||||||||||||
7 | Rutgers | 79 | ||||||||||||||||
7 | Rutgers | 82 | ||||||||||||||||
2 | Louisville | 87 | ||||||||||||||||
2 | Louisville | 69 | ||||||||||||||||
11 | West Virginia | 53 | 3 | Pittsburgh | 63 | |||||||||||||
14 | Providence | 48 | 11 | West Virginia | 72 | |||||||||||||
6 | DePaul | 75OT | ||||||||||||||||
6 | DePaul | 59 | ||||||||||||||||
3 | Pittsburgh | 62 | ||||||||||||||||
Championship Game
Big East Tournament Final Saturday, March 14 | ||||
1 | Connecticut | 75 | ||
2 | Louisville | 36 | ||
gollark: The amount of prize owners is *really small*, so not really.
gollark: Making prizes more available wouldn't really do anything bad other than hurt trading value of existing ones.
gollark: It probably would, though.
gollark: I have no idea how many there are. I don't see how people would be particularly hurt by prizes becoming easier to get.
gollark: Changes which upset lots of people are bad. So are status quos which upset people. We have a bad status quo.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.