2008 China Open – Men's Singles

Fernando González was the defending champion, but lost in the quarterfinals to Björn Phau.

Men's Singles
2008 China Open
Champion Andy Roddick
Runner-up Dudi Sela
Final score6–4, 6–7(6–8), 6–3
Draw32 (4Q / 3WC)
Seeds8
Main article: 2008 China Open (tennis)

Second-seeded Andy Roddick won in the final 6–4, 6–7(6–8), 6–3, against Dudi Sela.

Seeds

The top four seeds receive a bye into the second round.

  1. David Ferrer (Second Round)
  2. Andy Roddick (Champion)
  3. Fernando González (Quarterfinals)
  4. Richard Gasquet (Quarterfinals)
  5. Fernando Verdasco (Second Round)
  6. Tommy Robredo (Quarterfinals)
  7. Rainer Schüttler (Semifinals)
  8. Sam Querrey (Second Round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
  Dudi Sela 6 6  
7 Rainer Schüttler 3 3  
  Dudi Sela 4 78 3
2 Andy Roddick 6 66 6
  Björn Phau 2 77 1
2 Andy Roddick 6 64 6

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 D Ferrer 3 3  
  N Devilder 4 3     D Sela 6 6  
  D Sela 6 6     D Sela 6 6  
  I Minář 6 3 6 6 T Robredo 4 1  
  H-t Lee 3 6 2   I Minář 2 3  
  G García López 4 5   6 T Robredo 6 6  
6 T Robredo 6 7     D Sela 6 6  
7 R Schüttler 3 3  
4 R Gasquet 7 6  
Q J-c Xu 4 3     Y-h Lu 5 1  
  Y-h Lu 6 6   4 R Gasquet 6 3 4
WC P Sun 4 67   7 R Schüttler 4 6 6
Q J-C Scherrer 6 79   Q J-C Scherrer 1 4  
  I Navarro 6 3 4 7 R Schüttler 6 6  
7 R Schüttler 2 6 6

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
8 S Querrey 1 6 77
  J Levine 6 2 64 8 S Querrey 7 3 4
  B Phau 6 6     B Phau 5 6 6
Q H-w Nam 1 3     B Phau 6 4 6
WC Y Bai 4 5   3 F González 3 6 3
  G Soeda 6 7     G Soeda 6 64 1
3 F González 3 77 6
  B Phau 2 77 1
5/WC F Verdasco 6 6   2 A Roddick 6 64 6
  B Reynolds 3 3   5/WC F Verdasco 5 4  
  JC Ferrero 6 6     JC Ferrero 7 6  
  A Kudryavtsev 4 3     JC Ferrero 6 3 4
Q B Evans 77 1 712 2 A Roddick 2 6 6
  R Karanušić 65 6 610 Q B Evans 4 3  
2 A Roddick 6 6  
gollark: And what idiot made it *explode* if it ran into a problem it couldn't solve easily?
gollark: Surely language parsing is not *as* complex as massively hard maths problems.
gollark: 3.7 hard.
gollark: Latin grammar isn't *that* horrible. It just has somewhat more flexible word order than, say, English, and also a lot of random suffixes and stuff.
gollark: Revised version is up. You may need to refresh the page a bit to see it. I've tried to keep the content basically the same.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.