2008–09 CEBL

The Central European Basketball League, or CEBL for short, was a basketball tournament with Central European basketball teams.

In the 2008/2009 inaugural season, teams from the following five countries participated: Czech Republic, Austria, Romania, Hungary and Slovakia.

After the group rounds, Final Four was held in Timișoara, Romania. In the final match, Albacomp Fehervar won against BCM Elba Timișoara.[1]

Teams
Country Number of teams Teams
Slovakia 4 Skanska Pezinok, Spisska Nova Ves, MBK Handlová, BK Inter Bratislava.
Austria 3 Kapfenberg Bulls, Xion Dukes Klosterneuburg, UKJ BC Mollersdorf Traiskirchen.
Czech Republic 2 Geofin Novy Jicin, BK Opava.
Hungary 2 Marso-Vagép, Albacomp Fehérvár.
Romania 1 BCM Elba Timișoara.

Regular season

Group A
Pos Team Pld W L PF PA PD Pts Qualification TIM MAR TRA PEZ
1 Elba Timisoara 6 4 2 559 517 +42 10 Advance to quarterfinals — 94–73 88–75 84–69
2 Marso-Vagép 6 4 2 536 530 +6 10 89–82 — 98–85 103–95
3 Mollersdorf Traiskirchen 6 3 3 558 572 −14 9 95–99 106–95 — 95–93
4 Skanska Pezinok 6 1 5 540 0 +540 7 116–109 68–78 99–102 —
Source:

Group B
Pos Team Pld W L PF PA PD Pts Qualification FEH JIC KLO SNV
1 Albacomp Fehérvár 6 4 2 542 490 +52 10 Advance to quarterfinals — 102–70 80–70 102–76
2 Geofin Novy Jicin 6 4 2 502 448 +54 10 98–72 — 93–74 96–58
3 Xion Dukes Klosterneuburg 6 3 3 478 469 +9 9 93–63 77–67 — 88–63
4 Spisska Nova Ves 6 1 5 428 543 −115 7 83–103 65–78 83–76 —
Source:

Group C
Pos Team Pld W L PF PA PD Pts Qualification KAP OPA HAN INT
1 Kapfenberg Bulls 6 6 0 551 473 +78 12 Advance to quarterfinals — 97–95 97–85 105–67
2 Opava 6 2 4 537 529 +8 8 63–69 — 104–110 108–84
3 MBK Handlová 6 2 4 522 558 −36 8 74–93 85–76 — 92–100
4 BK Inter Bratislava 6 2 4 512 562 −50 8 89–90 84–91 88–76 —
Source:

Final Four
Semifinals
10 January 		Final
11 January
      
1 Elba Timișoara 90
4 Geofin Novy Jicin 87
Albacomp Fehérvár 92
Elba Timișoara 66
3 Albacomp Fehérvár 79
2 Kapfenberg Bulls 64
gollark: And in most cases it won't, because computers are fast and can easily deal with running a few block ciphers over things.
gollark: Well, if it doesn't involve any other compromises, it is good.
gollark: I would not be averse to non-TLS protocols in use as long as they provide approximately the same security properties.
gollark: I can change it to "TLS or other suitable client to server encryption layer".
gollark: Why can smartdust not use TLS, exactly?

References
  1. "CEBL". Archived from the original on 2010-04-27. Retrieved 2020-02-02.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.