2007 Davidoff Swiss Indoors – Singles

Roger Federer was the defending champion, and won in the final 6–3, 6–4, against Jarkko Nieminen.

Singles
2007 Davidoff Swiss Indoors
Champion Roger Federer
Runner-up Jarkko Nieminen
Final score6–3, 6–4
Draw32 (4Q / 3WC)
Seeds8
Main article: 2007 Davidoff Swiss Indoors

Seeds
  1. Roger Federer (Champion)
  2. Fernando González (Quarterfinals)
  3. David Ferrer (First Round)
  4. James Blake (Second Round)
  5. Tomáš Berdych (Quarterfinals)
  6. Guillermo Cañas (Second Round)
  7. Juan Ignacio Chela (First Round)
  8. Paul-Henri Mathieu (Quarterfinals)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
1 Roger Federer 78 77  
  Ivo Karlović 66 65  
1 Roger Federer 6 6  
  Jarkko Nieminen 3 4  
  Marcos Baghdatis 64 2  
  Jarkko Nieminen 77 6  

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 R Federer 6 3 6
  M Berrer 1 6 3 1 R Federer 6 6  
  JM del Potro 5       JM del Potro 1 4  
  M Russell 2r   1 R Federer 6 6  
SE N Kiefer 6 6   SE N Kiefer 3 2  
  C Berlocq 1 1   SE N Kiefer 6 6  
  S Koubek 6 6     S Koubek 3 2  
7 JI Chela 3 4   1 R Federer 78 77  
4/WC J Blake 6 6     I Karlović 66 65  
  Ó Hernández 3 4   4/WC J Blake 6 64 4
  I Karlović 6 6     I Karlović 4 77 6
WC M Chiudinelli 3 2     I Karlović 65 77 715
  D Nalbandian 65 2   5 T Berdych 77 62 613
  S Wawrinka 77 6     S Wawrinka 5 4  
  F López 64 6 3 5 T Berdych 7 6  
5 T Berdych 77 3 6

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
8/WC P-H Mathieu 6 6  
  F Dancevic 3 1   8/WC P-H Mathieu 67 6 6
  A Delic 4 3   Q A Golubev 79 4 1
Q A Golubev 6 6   8/WC P-H Mathieu 2 65  
  Montañés 2 2     M Baghdatis 6 77  
  M Baghdatis 6 6     M Baghdatis 61 6 6
  A Calleri 6 77     A Calleri 77 3 3
3 D Ferrer 4 63     M Baghdatis 64 2  
6 G Cañas 6 6     J Nieminen 77 6  
  J Acasuso 4 3   6 G Cañas 4 6 5
  R Ginepri 6 4 5   J Nieminen 6 3 7
  J Nieminen 3 6 7   J Nieminen 6 7  
Q J Reister 0 3   2 F González 3 5  
Q R Karanušić 6 6   Q R Karanušić 4 65  
Q J Haehnel 65 4   2 F González 6 77  
2 F González 77 6  
gollark: What do I have to do with this?
gollark: It probably wouldn't actually do much to terrorists/child predators/whatever unless they continued to use them despite this, which would be stupid, but would compromise everyone else's security and increase government power substantially.
gollark: What seems to actually be desired is to mandate backdoors in all the popular end to end encrypted chat things, which *is* probably possible, but which would be very bad.
gollark: I entirely disagree with this, not least because cryptography is basically everywhere now so they can't stop people end-to-end-encrypting things themselves.
gollark: Generally it goes something along the lines of "end-to-end encryption bad, because we can't spy on it, which we totally need to do because something something terrorism children".
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.