2007–08 Országos Bajnokság I (men's water polo)

2007–08 Országos Bajnokság I (men's water polo) was the 102nd water polo championship in Hungary.

OB I
Season2007–08
ChampionsVasas
EuroleagueVasas
Eger
Honvéd
LEN CupSzeged
Újpest

First stage

# Team M W D L G+ G- P
1.Domino-Bp. Honvéd22200233215540
2.Brendon-UPC-ZF-Egri VK22200227216340
3.Szeged-Beton VE22190324314138
4.TEVA-Vasas SC-Plaket22170527615334
5.Uniqa-Újpesti TE22121920520825
6.Ferencvárosi TC-Aprilia221111020718623
7.Pécsi VSK-Fűszért-Aquaprofit22811320222817
8.Pendola-Szentesi VK-Elektroglob22441416026612
9.Szolnoki Főiskola VSC22421619126010
10.OSC-Opus Via2233161702539
11.BVSC2241171552449
12.Androbau-Fehérvár Póló SE2231181402967


Championship Playoff
European competition Playoff
Relegation Playoff

Pld - Played; W - Won; L - Lost; PF - Points for; PA - Points against; Diff - Difference; Pts - Points.

Championship Playoff

Semifinals Final
              
1 Domino-Bp. Honvéd 9 8 11 11 9
4 TEVA-Vasas SC-Plaket 15 14 7 10 10
4 TEVA-Vasas SC-Plaket 10 11 10 7
2 Brendon-UPC-ZF-Egri VK 11 7 7 6
2 Brendon-UPC-ZF-Egri VK 9 7 9
3 Szeged-Beton VE 5 2 8 Third place
1 Domino-Bp. Honvéd 13 12
3 Szeged-Beton VE 10 6

European competition Playoff

Placement Semifinals Fifth place
              
5 Uniqa-Újpesti TE 10 7 14
8 Pendola-Szentesi VK-Elektroglob 9 8 5
5 Uniqa-Újpesti TE 11 8 9
6 Ferencvárosi TC-Aprilia 9 10 6
6 Ferencvárosi TC-Aprilia 8 10 12 8 13
7 Pécsi VSK-Fűszért-Aquaprofit 9 8 13 6 10 Seventh place
8 Pendola-Szentesi VK-Elektroglob 10 9
7 Pécsi VSK-Fűszért-Aquaprofit 11 13

Relegation Playoff

Placement Semifinals Ninth place
              
9 Szolnoki Főiskola VSC 12 8 8 6
12 Androbau-Fehérvár Póló SE 15 10 7 7
12 Androbau-Fehérvár Póló SE 9 9 10
11 BVSC 10 7 11
10 OSC-Opus Via 5 4 5 6
11 BVSC 6 3 6 7 Relegation play-offs
9 Szolnoki Főiskola VSC 7 7
10 OSC-Opus Via 9 11

Final standing

Sources

  • Magyar sportévkönyv 2009
gollark: If they mean approximately the same things as in the calculus I did, then if the gradient was positive/negative on one side and the same sign on the other it would not be a maximum/minimum but just an inflection point. But if the gradient changes sign, then it can be, and this probably requires a different value to on either side. But I don't really get what they're saying either.
gollark: I think to be a valid maximum/minimum it has to be >/< but *not* equal?
gollark: This is quite complicated. I may need a while.
gollark: I "can" read it "for" you?
gollark: So what would you say your favourite alleged features are and what are the most important unimplemented ones to you?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.