2004 St. Petersburg Open – Singles

Gustavo Kuerten was the defending champion, but did not participate this year.

Singles
2004 St. Petersburg Open
Champion Mikhail Youzhny
Runner-up Karol Beck
Final score6–2, 6–2
Main article: 2004 St. Petersburg Open

Mikhail Youzhny won the title, beating Karol Beck 6–2, 6–2 in the final.

Seeds
  1. Marat Safin (Quarterfinals)
  2. Dominik Hrbatý (First Round)
  3. Mardy Fish (Second Round)
  4. Mikhail Youzhny (Champion)
  5. Nikolay Davydenko (Second Round)
  6. David Ferrer (First Round)
  7. Michaël Llodra (Semifinals)
  8. Igor Andreev (First Round)

Draw

Key

Finals
Semifinals Final
          
7 Michaël Llodra 4 6 1
  Karol Beck 6 2 6
  Karol Beck 2 2  
4 Mikhail Youzhny 6 6  
4 Mikhail Youzhny 3 6 6
  Greg Rusedski 6 3 4

Top Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
1 M Safin 77 3  
Q A Peya 65 1r   1 M Safin 6 6  
  I Labadze 6 1 2   S Sargsian 4 2  
  S Sargsian 4 6 6 1 M Safin 4 1  
Q M Kohlmann 4 6 6 7 M Llodra 6 6  
  G Carraz 6 3 4 Q M Kohlmann 63 3  
WC M Elgin 2 2   7 M Llodra 77 6  
7 M Llodra 6 6   7 M Llodra 4 6 1
3 M Fish 6 6     K Beck 6 2 6
  J Hernych 2 4   3 M Fish 78 4 3
  A Martín 0 1     C Saulnier 66 6 6
  C Saulnier 6 6     C Saulnier 3 63  
  K Beck 6 6     K Beck 6 77  
Q J Vaněk 3 2     K Beck 6 64 6
WC I Kunitsyn 4 77 4 5 N Davydenko 1 77 4
5 N Davydenko 6 65 6

Bottom Half
First Round Second Round Quarterfinals Semifinals
8 I Andreev 6 1 5
  G Müller 4 6 7   G Müller 4 5  
  A Clément 4 6 4   J Benneteau 6 7  
  J Benneteau 6 1 6   J Benneteau 0 1  
  R Mello 67 62   4 M Youzhny 6 6  
  M Mirnyi 79 77     M Mirnyi 5 6 2
Q A Ram 6 63 64 4 M Youzhny 7 3 6
4 M Youzhny 2 77 77 4 M Youzhny 3 6 6
6 D Ferrer 3 2     G Rusedski 6 3 4
  R Štěpánek 6 6     R Štěpánek 61 6 4
WC M Rosset 4 3     G Rusedski 77 4 6
  G Rusedski 6 6     G Rusedski 6 79  
  P-H Mathieu 4 2     I Karlović 4 67  
  À Corretja 6 6     À Corretja 63 77 68
  I Karlović 77 5 6   I Karlović 77 65 710
2 D Hrbatý 65 7 4
gollark: This is one of those annoying things where we're limited to wild speculation so probably don't do anything weird businesswise.
gollark: Democratic ones theoretically allow more input from everyone, which should lead to decisions which consider their interests more and take into account information people know, but also run into whatever issues existing democracies have plus probably exciting new ones due to presumably having a direct democracy voting on a lot of things.
gollark: Hierarchical ones (theoretically) allow clear direction and management from the top but also lack input from lower levels and are vulnerable to the top people being wrong/bad.
gollark: Before trying to think of ideas for organization structure it might be good to clarify what exactly the organizational structure should do/allow/optimize.
gollark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xA27x7GRMZQ

References
    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.