2003 World Weightlifting Championships – Women's 63 kg
The 2003 World Weightlifting Championships were held in Vancouver, Canada from 14 November to 22 November. The women's 63 kilograms division was staged on 17 and 18 November 2003.
2003 World Weightlifting Championships | ||
---|---|---|
Men | Women | |
56 kg | 48 kg | |
62 kg | 53 kg | |
69 kg | 58 kg | |
77 kg | 63 kg | |
85 kg | 69 kg | |
94 kg | 75 kg | |
105 kg | +75 kg | |
+105 kg | ||
Schedule
Date | Time | Event |
---|---|---|
17 November 2003 | 16:00 | Group C |
18 November 2003 | 12:30 | Group B |
17:30 | Group A |
Medalists
Event | Gold | Silver | Bronze | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Snatch | 113.5 kg | 110.0 kg | 107.5 kg | |||
Clean & Jerk | 138.0 kg | 137.5 kg | 135.0 kg | |||
Total | 247.5 kg | 245.0 kg | 240.0 kg |
Records
Prior to this competition, the existing world records were as follows.
World Record | Snatch | 113.0 kg | Bali, Indonesia | 10 August 2003 | |
Clean & Jerk | 137.5 kg | Qinhuangdao, China | 12 September 2003 | ||
Total | 247.5 kg | Qinhuangdao, China | 12 September 2003 |
Results
Rank | Athlete | Group | Body weight | Snatch (kg) | Clean & Jerk (kg) | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | Rank | 1 | 2 | 3 | Rank | |||||
A | 62.16 | 102.5 | 107.5 | 110.0 | 130.0 | 135.0 | 138.0 | 247.5 | ||||
A | 62.47 | 102.5 | 107.5 | 132.5 | 137.5 | 245.0 | ||||||
A | 62.77 | 105.0 | 110.0 | 113.5 | 122.5 | 127.5 | 6 | 240.0 | ||||
4 | A | 61.71 | 100.0 | 6 | 130.0 | 135.0 | 235.0 | |||||
5 | A | 62.08 | 105.0 | 4 | 125.0 | 130.0 | 4 | 235.0 | ||||
6 | A | 62.50 | 95.0 | 100.0 | 102.5 | 5 | 122.5 | 127.5 | 5 | 230.0 | ||
7 | A | 61.90 | 95.0 | 7 | 115.0 | 120.0 | 8 | 215.0 | ||||
8 | A | 62.92 | 90.0 | 20 | 122.5 | 125.0 | 7 | 215.0 | ||||
9 | A | 62.48 | 95.0 | 8 | 112.5 | 117.5 | 10 | 212.5 | ||||
10 | A | 62.49 | 90.0 | 92.5 | 95.0 | 9 | 115.0 | 117.5 | 11 | 212.5 | ||
11 | B | 62.84 | 90.0 | 95.0 | 11 | 110.0 | 115.0 | 117.5 | 12 | 212.5 | ||
12 | B | 62.56 | 90.0 | 95.0 | 10 | 115.0 | 14 | 210.0 | ||||
13 | B | 62.93 | 90.0 | 95.0 | 12 | 110.0 | 115.0 | 15 | 210.0 | |||
14 | B | 62.24 | 87.5 | 22 | 115.0 | 120.0 | 9 | 207.5 | ||||
15 | B | 62.01 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 18 | 115.0 | 13 | 205.0 | ||||
16 | C | 62.12 | 90.0 | 92.5 | 14 | 110.0 | 112.5 | 18 | 205.0 | |||
17 | B | 62.44 | 87.5 | 92.5 | 15 | 112.5 | 20 | 205.0 | ||||
18 | B | 58.33 | 85.0 | 87.5 | 90.0 | 16 | 107.5 | 112.5 | 16 | 202.5 | ||
19 | B | 61.15 | 87.5 | 90.0 | 92.5 | 13 | 107.5 | 110.0 | 22 | 202.5 | ||
20 | B | 62.13 | 85.0 | 90.0 | 19 | 107.5 | 110.0 | 112.5 | 19 | 202.5 | ||
21 | B | 61.24 | 85.0 | 87.5 | 21 | 105.0 | 110.0 | 23 | 197.5 | |||
22 | C | 61.64 | 80.0 | 85.0 | 25 | 105.0 | 110.0 | 112.5 | 17 | 197.5 | ||
23 | B | 60.27 | 90.0 | 17 | 105.0 | 25 | 195.0 | |||||
24 | B | 62.47 | 85.0 | 87.5 | 23 | 105.0 | 29 | 192.5 | ||||
25 | C | 62.78 | 80.0 | 32 | 105.0 | 110.0 | 112.5 | 21 | 192.5 | |||
26 | C | 61.08 | 82.5 | 85.0 | 24 | 100.0 | 105.0 | 26 | 190.0 | |||
27 | C | 62.17 | 80.0 | 82.5 | 28 | 105.0 | 27 | 187.5 | ||||
28 | C | 62.68 | 85.0 | 26 | 102.5 | 31 | 187.5 | |||||
29 | C | 62.16 | 80.0 | 82.5 | 27 | 100.0 | 102.5 | 30 | 185.0 | |||
30 | C | 62.31 | 77.5 | 34 | 102.5 | 107.5 | 24 | 185.0 | ||||
31 | C | 62.33 | 80.0 | 29 | 100.0 | 105.0 | 28 | 185.0 | ||||
32 | C | 62.34 | 80.0 | 30 | 100.0 | 32 | 180.0 | |||||
33 | C | 62.77 | 77.5 | 80.0 | 31 | 95.0 | 33 | 175.0 | ||||
34 | C | 62.88 | 75.0 | 80.0 | 33 | 95.0 | 34 | 175.0 | ||||
35 | C | 60.92 | 65.0 | 35 | 85.0 | 35 | 150.0 | |||||
— | C | 62.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||
— | C | 62.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||
— | C | 62.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
New records
Snatch | 113.5 kg | WR | |
Clean & Jerk | 138.0 kg | WR |
gollark: Wow, it does *not* like that.
gollark: It is hotpluggable, but still.
gollark: osmarks.net may be down for some time. I accidentally unplugged the hard disk.
gollark: Just use Rust. It automatically preautohyperfixes all concurrency instantaneously.
gollark: I could offload this stuff to one of the osmarksVPSes™, which are generally more reliable, however no.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.