2002 WTA Brasil Open – Singles
Monica Seles was the defending champion, but lost in the semifinals to Eleni Daniilidou.
Singles | |
---|---|
2002 WTA Brasil Open | |
Champion | |
Runner-up | |
Final score | 6–3, 0–6, 6–2 |
Anastasia Myskina won in the final, beating Daniilidou 6–3, 0–6, 6–2.
Seeds
The top four seeds received a bye into the second round.
Jelena Dokić (Semifinals) Monica Seles (Semifinals) Anastasia Myskina (Champion) Patty Schnyder (Quarterfinals) Iva Majoli (Second Round) Tatiana Panova (First Round) Nathalie Dechy (Second Round) Eleni Daniilidou (Final)
Draw
Key
- Q = Qualifier
- WC = Wild Card
- LL = Lucky Loser
- Alt = Alternate
- SE = Special Exempt
- PR = Protected Ranking
- ITF = ITF entry
- JE = Junior Exempt
- w/o = Walkover
- r = Retired
- d = Defaulted
Finals
Semifinals | Final | ||||||||||||
1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
3 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||
3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | ||||||||||
8 | 3 | 6 | 2 | ||||||||||
8 | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||
2/WC | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
Top Half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 77 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6 | 61 | Q | 63 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 6 | 4 | 77 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
7 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 6 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 2 | 3 | Q | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bottom half
First Round | Second Round | Quarterfinals | Semifinal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q | 6 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
8 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 | 6 | 6 | 2/WC | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
WC | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
4 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
6 | 6 | 2/WC | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/WC | 7 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
gollark: Anyway, while I don't agree with your views at all, it is interesting to discuss things with someone who thinks very differently, so thanks.
gollark: It is probably an improvement on average, at least.
gollark: The current system, whatever you label it, works fairly well. There are definitely problems. So many problems. Also lots of room for significant improvements without getting rid of it all. But it works decently well without requiring everyone to magically get along fine and the world is steadily increasing in prosperity.
gollark: If your thing only works for self-selected small groups, then it's hardly a good way to organize... our whole global societies comprising 7 billion people, quite a lot of whom don't like each other.
gollark: I just don't think it would actually work at current global scales or for probably most people.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.