2000 WTA Tour Championships – Singles

Lindsay Davenport was the defending champion of the WTA Tour Championships tennis singles tournament, but lost in the first round to Elena Dementieva.

Singles
2000 WTA Tour Championships
Champion Martina Hingis
Runner-up Monica Seles
Final score6–7(5–7), 6–4, 6–4
Main article: 2000 WTA Tour Championships

Martina Hingis, the previous year's finalist, defeated Monica Seles 6–7(5–7), 6–4, 6–4 in the final to claim her second WTA Tour Championships.

Seeds
  1. Martina Hingis (Champion)
  2. Lindsay Davenport (First Round)
  3. Monica Seles (Final)
  4. Conchita Martínez (Quarterfinals)
  5. Arantxa Sánchez Vicario (First Round)
  6. Nathalie Tauziat (Quarterfinals)
  7. Anna Kournikova (Semifinals)
  8. Chanda Rubin (First Round)

Notes:

Draw

Key

Finals
First Round Quarterfinals Semifinals Final
1 Martina Hingis 6 6  
  Julie Halard 2 3   1 Martina Hingis 6 62 6
  Amy Frazier 3 2   6 Nathalie Tauziat 1 77 2
6 Nathalie Tauziat 6 6   1 Martina Hingis 77 6  
4 Conchita Martínez 2 6 6 7 Anna Kournikova 62 2  
  Elena Likhovtseva 6 4 3 4 Conchita Martínez 4 0  
  Jennifer Capriati 4 3   7 Anna Kournikova 6 6  
7 Anna Kournikova 6 6   1 Martina Hingis 65 6 6
8 Chanda Rubin 2 1   3 Monica Seles 77 4 4
  Amanda Coetzer 6 6     Amanda Coetzer 3 4  
  Sandrine Testud 3 4   3 Monica Seles 6 6  
3 Monica Seles 6 6   3 Monica Seles 6 77  
5 Arantxa Sánchez Vicario 5 4     Elena Dementieva 1 64  
  Kim Clijsters 7 6     Kim Clijsters 4 6 4
  Elena Dementieva 3 79 6   Elena Dementieva 6 2 6
2 Lindsay Davenport 6 67 4
gollark: Well, you can ask people to not put irrelevant random images in, but they'll probably do it for some stupid reason, and it's good if they can at least be mildly more efficient about it.
gollark: There's JPEG-XL or something, which will apparently allow *lossless* higher-efficiency representation of existing JPEGs. Very exciting.
gollark: Consider all those annoying mostly irrelevant images in articles. Those don't really need to actually be very high quality, and if you can lossily compress them to 20KB or so you can really shave off loading times.
gollark: Although vector graphics would often be nicer, they're not always practical.
gollark: It's perfectly fine for other things where you can get nice small images with little perceptible quality loss.

See also
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.