1996 Conference USA Men's Soccer Tournament
The 1996 Conference USA Men's Soccer Tournament was the second edition of the Conference USA Men's Soccer Tournament. The tournament decided the Conference USA champion and guaranteed representative into the 1996 NCAA Division I Men's Soccer Championship. The tournament was hosted by the University of South Florida and the final games were played at USF Soccer Stadium.[1]
| Country |  |
|---|---|
| Dates | 5–17 November 1996 |
| Teams | 9 |
| Champions | USF (1st title) |
| Runners-up | Marquette |
| Matches played | 8 |
| Goals scored | 16 (2 per match) |
← 1995 1997 → | |
Bracket
| First Round Tuesday Nov. 5 |
Quarterfinals Tuesday Nov. 12 |
Semifinals Friday Nov. 15 |
Final Sunday Nov. 17 | |||||||||||||||
| 8 | Louisville | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| 9 | Cincinnati | 1OT | 1 | Charlotte | 0 | |||||||||||||
| 9 | Cincinnati | 1OT | ||||||||||||||||
| 9 | Cincinnati | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | Marquette | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| 4 | UAB | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | Marquette | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | Marquette | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2 | USF | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2 | USF | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| 7 | DePaul | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2 | USF | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| 6 | Memphis | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| 3 | Saint Louis | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| 6 | Memphis | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Awards
Most Valuable Midfielder:
- Mike Mekelburg, USF
Most Valuable Forward:
- Jeff Cunningham, USF
Most Valuable Defender:
- Scott Ziemba, Marquette
Most Valuable Goalkeeper:
- Jim Welch, Marquette
gollark: Which I suppose can make some sense if you assume that it's "rational" in that people... like surprises, or something, but...
gollark: People *play the lottery*, too.
gollark: People somehow can't accept positive-sum games.
gollark: > A core proposition in economics is that voluntary exchanges benefit both parties. We show that people often deny the mutually beneficial nature of exchange, instead espousing the belief that one or both parties fail to benefit from the exchange. Across 4 studies (and 7 further studies in the Supplementary Materials), participants read about simple exchanges of goods and services, judging whether each party to the transaction was better off or worse off afterwards. These studies revealed that win–win denial is pervasive, with buyers consistently seen as less likely to benefit from transactions than sellers. Several potential psychological mechanisms underlying win–win denial are considered, with the most important influences being mercantilist theories of value (confusing wealth for money) and naïve realism (failing to observe that people do not arbitrarily enter exchanges). We argue that these results have widespread implications for politics and society.
gollark: (linking because I happened to read it recently)
References
- "CUSA Record Book" (PDF). 2014 CUSA Men's Soccer Record Book. Conference USA. 2014. p. 7. Retrieved 2 September 2015.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.