1994 MAC Men's Basketball Tournament

The 1994 Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference Men's Basketball Tournament took place on March 8–10, 1994 at Battelle Hall in Columbus, Ohio. Ohio defeated Miami (OH), 89–66 in the championship game, to win its third MAC Tournament title.

1994 MAC Men's Basketball Tournament
ClassificationDivision I
Season199394
Teams8
First round siteCampus Arenas
Campus Sites
Finals siteBattelle Hall
Columbus, Ohio
ChampionsOhio (3rd title)
Winning coachLarry Hunter (1st title)
MVPGary Trent (Ohio)
MAC Men's Basketball Tournaments
1993–94 Mid-American Conference men's basketball standings
Conf  Overall
TeamW L PCT  W L PCT
Ohio144 .778  258  .758
Bowling Green126 .667  1810  .643
Miami126 .667  1911  .633
Ball State117 .611  1612  .571
Toledo108 .556  1512  .556
Eastern Michigan108 .556  1512  .556
Kent State810 .444  1314  .481
Western Michigan711 .389  1414  .500
Central Michigan414 .222  521  .192
Akron216 .111  818  .308
1994 MAC Tournament winner
Rankings from AP Poll

The Bobcats earned an automatic bid to the 1991 NCAA Tournament as #12 seed in the East region. In the round of 64 Ohio fell to Indiana, 84–72.

Format

Eight of ten conference members participated, with play beginning in the quarterfinal round. Central Michigan and Akron were left out of the tournament field.

Bracket

Quarterfinals
March 8
Semifinals
March 9
Final
March 10
         
1 Ohio 87
8 Western Michigan 56
1 Ohio 79
4 Ball State 70
4 Ball State 80
5 Toledo 73
1 Ohio 89
3 Miami (OH) 66
3 Miami (OH) 90
6 Eastern Michigan 60
3 Miami (OH) 61
2 Bowling Green 59
2 Bowling Green 68
7 Kent State 58

[1]

gollark: I think all the updater thing would need to do is:on the non-CC side, just track what files changed since the last release, generate a checksum, and either generate an archive or a bunch of URLs for it.on the CC side, periodically check a manifest file, store its own version locally, check if a newer version is available on the server, and if so download the files which have changed.
gollark: Probably gitget.
gollark: I should look at how Opus does its updates, since Opus is generally considered good.
gollark: I see. Your standards for "not too hard" are probably different to mine.
gollark: I mean, git is complicated and has many legacy things behind it, a simple CC updater thing with limited diff-ing capability is still pretty generalizable.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.