1968 Pau Grand Prix
The 1968 Pau Grand Prix was a Formula Two motor race held on 21 April 1968 at the Pau circuit, in Pau, Pyrénées-Atlantiques, France. The Grand Prix was won by Jackie Stewart, driving the Matra MS7. Robin Widdows finished second and Jean-Pierre Beltoise third.
1968 Pau Grand Prix | |||
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Race details | |||
Date | 21 April 1968 | ||
Official name | XXVIII Pau Grand Prix | ||
Location | Pau, France | ||
Course | Temporary Street Circuit | ||
Course length | 2.760 km (1.720 mi) | ||
Distance | 70 laps, 193.200 km (120.048 mi) | ||
Pole position | |||
Driver | Braham-Cosworth | ||
Time | 1:20.5 | ||
Fastest lap | |||
Driver |
| Matra-Cosworth | |
Time | 1:20.1 | ||
Podium | |||
First | Matra-Cosworth | ||
Second | McLaren-Cosworth | ||
Third | Matra-Cosworth |
Classification
Race
Pos | No | Driver | Vehicle | Laps | Time/Retired | Grid | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 8 | Matra-Cosworth | 70 | 1hr 36min 08.0sec | 3 | ||
2 | 14 | McLaren-Cosworth | 69 | + 1 lap | 6 | ||
3 | 10 | Matra-Cosworth | 69 | + 1 lap | 2 | ||
4 | 22 | Chevron-Cosworth | 68 | + 2 laps | 12 | ||
5 | 20 | McLaren-Cosworth | 67 | + 3 laps | 11 | ||
6 | 28 | Tecno-Cosworth | 66 | + 4 laps | 7 | ||
7 | 30 | Lola-Cosworth | 66 | + 4 laps | 9 | ||
8 | 24 | Lola-Cosworth | 66 | + 4 laps | 10 | ||
9 | 16 | McLaren-Cosworth | 65 | + 5 laps | 14 | ||
Ret | 18 | McLaren-Cosworth | 45 | Accident | 4 | ||
Ret | 6 | Brabham-Cosworth | 27 | Accident | 8 | ||
Ret | 12 | Matra-Cosworth | 27 | Accident | 5 | ||
Ret | 4 | Brabham-Cosworth | 21 | Accident | 1 | ||
Ret | 32 | Lola-Cosworth | 16 | Fuel injection | 13 | ||
Fastest Lap: Jackie Stewart (Matra-Cosworth) - 1:20.1 | |||||||
Sources:[1] | |||||||
Preceded by 1967 Pau Grand Prix |
Pau Grand Prix 1968 |
Succeeded by 1969 Pau Grand Prix |
gollark: Consequentialist-ly speaking (yes, I am aware you don't subscribe to this) a technological development could be "bad", if the majority of the possible uses for it are negative, or it's most likely to be used for negative things. To what extent any technology actually falls into that is a separate issue though.
gollark: You can show that 2 + 2 = 4 follows from axioms, and that the system allows you to define useful mathematical tools to model reality.
gollark: If you're going to say something along the lines of "see how it deals with [SCENARIO] and rate that by [OTHER STANDARD]", this doesn't work because it sneaks in [OTHER STANDARD] as a more fundamental underlying ethical system.
gollark: I don't see how you can empirically test your ethics like you can a scientific theory.
gollark: I'm not sure exactly how you define "moral relativists", but personally I've never seen a convincing/working argument for some particular ethical system being *objectively true*, and don't think it's even possible.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.