1965–66 SM-sarja season
The 1965–66 SM-sarja season was the 35th season of the SM-sarja, the top level of ice hockey in Finland. 12 teams participated in the league, and Ilves Tampere won the championship.
First round
Group A
| Club | GP | W | T | L | GF-GA | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Lukko Rauma | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 42:25 | 15 |
| 2. | SaiPa Lauritsala | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 40:34 | 13 |
| 3. | Reipas Lahti | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 46:36 | 10 |
| 4. | Karhut Pori | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 32:43 | 8 |
| 5. | HJK Helsinki | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 29:48 | 8 |
| 6. | Koo-Vee Tampere | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 29:35 | 6 |
Group B
| Club | GP | W | T | L | GF-GA | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Ilves Tampere | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 53:20 | 18 |
| 2. | TPS Turku | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 39:29 | 13 |
| 3. | RU-38 Pori | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 35:28 | 11 |
| 4. | TuTo Turku | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 21:25 | 10 |
| 5. | HIFK Helsinki | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 19:43 | 5 |
| 6. | Kärpät Oulu | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 22:44 | 3 |
Second round
Final round
| Club | GP | W | T | L | GF-GA | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Ilves Tampere | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 58:26 | 16 |
| 2. | Lukko Rauma | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 33:29 | 12 |
| 3. | SaiPa Lauritsala | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 29:30 | 10 |
| 4. | TPS Turku | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 27:29 | 10 |
| 5. | RU-38 Pori | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 33:40 | 8 |
| 6. | Reipas Lahti | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 25:51 | 4 |
Qualification round
| Club | GP | W | T | L | GF-GA | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7. | Karhut Pori | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 42:30 | 13 |
| 8. | Koo-Vee Tampere | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 45:25 | 12 |
| 9. | TuTo Turku | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 30:31 | 12 |
| 10. | HJK Helsinki | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 40:37 | 11 |
| 11. | HIFK Helsinki | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 27:34 | 8 |
| 12. | Kärpät Oulu | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 20:47 | 4 |
| Preceded by 1964–65 SM-sarja season |
SM-sarja season 1965–66 |
Succeeded by 1966–67 SM-sarja season |
gollark: Evolutionary fitness is also not the same as physical fitness.
gollark: That's plausible I guess, but it's possible that many of those could have been avoided (and your definition would count this as "fitness", even). I'm pretty sure it's still less common than, well, other day to day bad things.
gollark: Are those *common*? I don't think I know anyone who's actually experienced any of those. Except maybe animals, very broadly.
gollark: I mean, most common bad situations are going to be along the lines of "someone was rude to me at work" or "my car broke down", not "I must run away from a thing very fast" or "I have to lift a several hundred kilogram object for some reason".
gollark: That definition seems pretty orthogonal to actual common meanings.
External links
- Season on hockeyarchives.info
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.