1932–33 United States collegiate men's ice hockey season
The 1932–33 United States collegiate men's ice hockey season was the 38th season of collegiate ice hockey in the United States.
1932–33 United States collegiate men's ice hockey season | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Duration | December 1932– March 1933 | ||||
|
Regular season
Standings
1932–33 Collegiate ice hockey standings | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conference | Overall | |||||||||||||
GP | W | L | T | Pct. | GF | GA | GP | W | L | T | GF | GA | ||
Alaska-Fairbanks | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | – | – | |
Amherst | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | – | – | |
Army | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 27 | 35 | |
Boston College | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 23 | 26 | |
Boston University | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 42 | 17 | |
Bowdoin | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | – | – | |
Brown | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 13 | 6 | 6 | 1 | – | – | |
Clarkson | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 45 | 34 | |
Colgate | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | – | – | |
Dartmouth | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 30 | 58 | |
Hamilton | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | – | – | |
Harvard | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | – | – | |
Marquette | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | – | – | |
Massachusetts | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | – | – | |
Michigan | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 16 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 63 | 29 | |
Michigan Tech | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | – | – | |
Middlebury | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | – | – | |
Minnesota | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | – | – | |
MIT | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9 | 2 | 6 | 1 | – | – | |
New Hampshire | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 7 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 25 | |
North Dakota | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9 | 1 | 8 | 0 | – | – | |
Northeastern | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | – | – | |
Princeton | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 19 | 15 | 4 | 0 | – | – | |
Union | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | – | – | |
Williams | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | – | – | |
Wisconsin | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0 | – | – | |
Yale | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 19 | 11 | 8 | 0 | – | – |
gollark: Which is silly for a variety of reasons - even if you agree with the concept of randomly reweighting votes based on area, at least do it honestly and directly and not in such a bizarre, convoluted and arbitrary way?
gollark: People are somewhat apiological sometimes and say "oh, but it's good because it balances out power in rural areas".
gollark: Well, Event 128-κ is probably *not* going to be repeated.
gollark: I heard they have very insecure voting machines.
gollark: The solution is simple: go to Russia, and hack into the US electoral system.
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.