1929 Országos Bajnokság I (men's water polo)
1929 Országos Bajnokság I (men's water polo) was the 23rd water polo championship in Hungary. There were nine teams who played one round match for the title. It was the first time when teams from outside Budapest also participated in the championship. From this season it is called National Championship.
| Season | 1929 |
|---|---|
| Champions | Magyar AC |
← 1928 1930 → | |
Final list
| # | Team | M | W | D | L | G+ | G- | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | MAC | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 29 | 7 | 13 |
| 2. | Újpesti TE | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 53 | 13 | 13 |
| 3. | III. ker. TVE | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 36 | 10 | 12 |
| 4. | MTK | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 35 | 13 | 11 |
| 5. | MOVE Eger SE | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 15 | 11 |
| 6. | Szegedi UE | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 36 | 6 |
| 7. | Ferencvárosi TC | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 20 | 29 | 4 |
| 8. | BSZKRT SE | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 43 | 2 |
| 9. | Nemzeti SC | 8 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 59 | 0 |
* M: Matches W: Win D: Drawn L: Lost G+: Goals earned G-: Goals got P: Point
| OB I 1929 Champions |
|---|
Magyar AC 1st Title |
2. Class
1. MUE 8, 2. Tatabányai SC 6, 3. Orosházi TK 4, 4. BSE 0(2), 5. Tatatóvárosi AC 0 pont. Penalty pointas are in brackets.
Sources
- Gyarmati Dezső: Aranykor (Hérodotosz Könyvkiadó és Értékesítő Bt., Budapest, 2002.)
- Sport-évkönyv 1929
gollark: I do not understand that sentence ("The alternative is work a political method for political reason.") and it is not pizza, I have had no commercial relations with pizza companies, I am not paid to subliminally advertise pizza, etc.
gollark: I guess maybe in politics/economics/sociology the alternative is something like "lean on human intuition" or "make the correct behaviour magically resolve from self-interest". Not sure how well those actually work.
gollark: - the replication crisis does exist, but it's not like *every paper* has a 50% chance of being wrong - it's mostly in some fields and you can generally estimate which things won't replicate fairly well without much specialized knowledge- science™ agrees on lots of things, just not some highly politicized things- you *can* do RCTs and correlation studies and such, which they seem to be ignoring- some objectivity is better than none- sure, much of pop science is not great, but that doesn't invalidate... all science- they complain about running things based on "trial and error and guesswork", but then don't offer any alternative
gollark: The alternative to basing things on science, I mean. The obvious alternative seems to basically just be guessing?
gollark: What's the alternative? Science is at least *slightly* empirical and right. Also, the video is wrong.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.