1909–10 Missouri Tigers men's basketball team

The 1909–10 Missouri Tigers men's basketball team represented University of Missouri in the 1909–10 college basketball season. The team was led by second year head coach Guy Lowman. The captain of the team was Frank Burress.

1909–10 Missouri Tigers men's basketball
ConferenceBig Eight Conference
1909–10 record8–11 (3–7 MVIAA)
Head coachGuy Lowman
Home arenaRothwell Gymnasium

Missouri finished with an 8–11 record overall and a 3–7 record in the Missouri Valley Conference. This was good enough for a 3rd-place finish in the regular season conference standings.

Schedule and results

Date
time, TV
Rank# Opponent# Result Record Site
city, state
January 10*
William Jewell W 42–19  1–0
 
Columbia, Missouri
January 11*
William Jewell W 37–35  2–0
 
Columbia, Missouri
January 13
Washington (MO) W 25–10  3–0
(1–0)
 
Columbia, Missouri
January 14
Washington (MO) W 30–9  4–0
(2–0)
 
Columbia, Missouri
January 21*
Grinnell L 30–34  4–1
(2–0)
 
Columbia, Missouri
January 22*
Grinnell L 8–32  4–2
(2–0)
 
Columbia, Missouri
February 5*
Emporia State W 32–8  5–2
(2–0)
 
Columbia, Missouri
February 9*
at Central Missouri W 28–27  6–2
(2–0)
 
Warrensburg, Missouri
February 10*
at Central Missouri W 20–19  7–2
(2–0)
 
Warrensburg, Missouri
February 11
at Kansas L 15–29  7–3
(2–1)
 
Lawrence, Kansas
February 12
at Kansas L 14–27  7–4
(2–2)
 
Lawrence, Kansas
February 14
at Drake W 28–7  8–4
(3–2)
 
Des Moines, Iowa
February 15
at Iowa State L 11–13  8–5
(3–3)
 
Ames, Iowa
February 16*
at Iowa L 6–20  8–6
(3–3)
 
Iowa City, Iowa
February 21
Kansas L 21–25  8–7
(3–4)
 
Columbia, Missouri
February 22
Kansas L 22–58  8–8
(3–5)
 
Columbia, Missouri
February 28
at Washington (MO) L 12–24  8–9
(3–6)
 
St. Louis, Missouri
March 1
at Washington (MO) L 13–35  8–10
(3–7)
 
St. Louis, Missouri
March 23*
MO Athletic Club L 22–32  8–11
(3–7)
 
Columbia, Missouri
*Non-conference game. #Rankings from Coaches' Poll. (#) Tournament seedings in parentheses.
All times are in Central Standard Time.

[1]

gollark: Well, yes, but they're byte sequences.
gollark: I mean, it's better than C and stuff, and I wouldn't mind writing simple apps in it.
gollark: Speaking specifically about the error handling, it may be "simple", but it's only "simple" in the sense of "the compiler writers do less work". It's very easy to mess it up by forgetting the useless boilerplate line somewhere, or something like that.
gollark: Speaking more generally than the type system, Go is just really... anti-abstraction... with, well, the gimped type system, lack of much metaprogramming support, and weird special cases, and poor error handling.
gollark: - They may be working on them, but they initially claimed that they weren't necessary and they don't exist now. Also, I don't trust them to not do them wrong.- Ooookay then- Well, generics, for one: they *kind of exist* in that you can have generic maps, channels, slices, and arrays, but not anything else. Also this (https://fasterthanli.me/blog/2020/i-want-off-mr-golangs-wild-ride/), which is mostly about the file handling not being good since it tries to map on concepts which don't fit. Also channels having weird special syntax. Also `for` and `range` and `new` and `make` basically just being magic stuff which do whatever the compiler writers wanted with no consistency- see above- Because there's no generic number/comparable thing type. You would need to use `interface{}` or write a new function (with identical code) for every type you wanted to compare- You can change a signature somewhere and won't be alerted, but something else will break because the interface is no longer implemented- They are byte sequences. https://blog.golang.org/strings.- It's not. You need to put `if err != nil { return err }` everywhere.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.