1897 Red River flood

The 1897 Red River flood took place in April 1897, along the Red River resulting in significant damage to the city of Fargo, North Dakota. The conditions which led to the flood of 1897 were similar to the conditions behind the 2009 flood, however the 1897 flood was different in terms of the human response to it.[1] Although the river gauge was not installed on the Red River until 1901, other sources indicate that the crest of the 1897 flood at a site 1.5 miles (2.4 km) downstream from the present Fargo gauge would have been 40.10 ft (with a discharge rate of 25,000 ft3/s) according to the present datum.[2] Until the 2009 flood the 1897 flood was the highest water recorded in the Fargo-Moorhead area and has since served as the benchmark for which many other floods of the Red River were measured against.

1897 Red River flood
The Red River drainage basin, with the Red River highlighted
DateApril 1 - April 24

Causes

In the spring of 1897 R.M. Probesfield took a measurement of 5 feet (1.5 m) of snow on the ground in an area which was free from drifting; a value 2 feet (0.61 m) higher than one taken prior to the 1861 flood.[2] Due to the level of measured snowfall a flood in the spring was expected.

River crests
CityCrestDate
Wahpeton, North Dakota2' 8" above the 1893 high[2]1897-03-31
Fargo, North Dakota40.10 ft (present datum)[2]
34.2 ft (1952 datum)[2]		1897-04-07 - Early Morning
Grand Forks, North DakotaLine along 3rd Street[2]
Covering Demers Ave in East Grand Forks[2]		1897-04-10 - Noon
gollark: I'd also expect places which seem to actually care to have sensible somewhat-long-term-viable (i.e. non-lockdown) plans for dealing with stuff.
gollark: This is cool, I have apparently been randomly picked for a COVID-19 testing study.
gollark: I don't really like old games, and I generally had a lot of free time *anyway*.
gollark: Mostly fine. It's better than school, at least. It would be nice if I could actually try some new activities or something though, since that stuff seems to mostly be shut down.
gollark: I am hoping that whoever is behind that won't decide to try something like this again, but I bet *someone* will think "ah yes, this is a great idea, we'll just lie because it's mildly more convenient, that can't go wrong in the long term".

References
  1. "Red River Flood Comparable To 1897". Vance Publishing. 2009-03-23. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
  2. "Red River of the North Flooding - 1897". USGS. 2008-03-14. Archived from the original on 31 March 2009. Retrieved 1 April 2009.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.