Nunation

Nunation (Arabic: تَنوِين‎, tanwīn ), in some Semitic languages such as Literary Arabic, is the addition of one of three vowel diacritics (ḥarakāt) to a noun or adjective.

This is used to indicate the word ends in an alveolar nasal without the addition of the letter nūn. The noun phrase is fully declinable and syntactically unmarked for definiteness, identifiable in speech.

Literary Arabic
Nunation - tanwīn تَنْوِين
Symbol
ـٌ ‎
ـٍ ‎
ـً ‎

Transliteration
-un
-in
-an
Case
Nom
Gen
Acc
Example on the word بيت bayt
بيتٌ ‎
بيتٍ ‎
بيتًا ‎
Transliteration baytun baytin baytan

When writing Literary Arabic in full diacritics, there are three nunation diacritics, which indicate the suffixes -un (IPA: /-un/) (nominative case), -in /-in/ (genitive), and -an /an/ (accusative). The orthographical rules for nunation with the fatḥah sign ـً‎ is by an additional ا‎ alif (اً‎ modern style, diacritic above alif; or ـًا‎ classical style, diacritic before alif), above ةً‎ (tāʾ marbūṭah تاء مربوطة) or above ءً‎ (hamzah همزة).

In spoken Arabic, nunation only exists in a few expressions, with -an.

Since Arabic has no indefinite article, nouns that are nunated are often indefinite. However, many definite nouns can also be nunated: for example, in the expression أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا رَسُولُ الله (ashhadu anna Muḥammadan rasūlu l-lāh(i) /ʔaʃ.ha.du ʔan.na mu.ħam.ma.dan ra.suː.lul.laː(.hi)/ "I bear witness that Muhammad is the messenger of God."), in which the name محمد Muḥammad, a definite noun, is nunated to مُحَمَّدًا Muḥammadan to indicate that it is in the accusative case (because it follows ّأن.) Names of people are treated as definite nouns in the grammar of Literary Arabic.

Akkadian language

Nunation may also refer to the -n  ending of duals in Akkadian (until it was dropped in the Old Babylonian period).[1]

gollark: Huh, did the loss function on mine go *up*? 🐝.
gollark: See, this is actually quite good.
gollark: This is increasingly coherent, hmmm.
gollark: > , which is really weird.<|endoftext|>Hmm, it seems to not be a good comparison.<|endoftext|>>Also, the server froze and crashed.<|endoftext|>It's just what I have now.<|endoftext|>It should have been fine, since I have no idea how it works.<|endoftext|>I don't think so, since I don't assume it's *necessary*.<|endoftext|>The only way I'm aware of the server is that I can't be trusted, and my bot is *not* being unable to verify the name.<|endoftext|>It's not the point, though. That would be very bad.<|endoftext|>My server has been pretty sure of the "decre" thing, but it's less annoying to just use an entire server for the sort of thing.<|endoftext|>I'm not an idiot, and it's not even particularly related, so it's a bit less bad.<|endoftext|>This isn't particularly relatedly, but I guess it's actually *probably* relevant.<|endoftext|>I don't think it is a
gollark: Oh, obviously.

See also

References
  1. Akkadian grammar: morphology Archived 2009-07-05 at the Wayback Machine
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.