Žaneta Jaunzeme-Grende
Žaneta Jaunzeme-Grende (born 10 March 1964)[1] is a Latvian politician and businesswoman. She is a member of the National Alliance, and former Minister for Culture in the Third Dombrovskis cabinet. She was President of the Latvian Chamber of Commerce from 2008 to 2011.[1]
Žaneta Jaunzeme-Grende | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Minister for Culture of Latvia | |
| In office 25 October 2011 – 16 September 2013 | |
| Prime Minister | Valdis Dombrovskis |
| Preceded by | Sarmīte Ēlerte |
| Succeeded by | Dace Melbārde |
| Personal details | |
| Born | 10 March 1964 Riga, Latvian SSR |
| Nationality |  |
| Political party | National Alliance |
| Other political affiliations | All For Latvia! (2011) |
| Alma mater | University of Latvia Latvian Academy of Sport Education |
| Profession | Entrepreneur |
On September 16, 2013 Jaunzeme-Grende was fired from the position of Minister for Culture of Latvia by the Prime Minister Valdis Dombrovskis because of her conflict with the culture sector[2], She was subsequently replaced by Dace Melbārde.[3]
Footnotes
- "Kultūras ministres kandidātes Žanetas Jaunzemes-Grendes biogrāfija". TVNet (in Latvian). 24 October 2011. Retrieved 29 October 2011.
- "Latvia's culture minister fired over conflicts". The Baltic Times. 17 August 2013. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
- "Melnbarde is formally nominated for the post of Culture Minister". Baltic News Network. 29 October 2013. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
- "Žaneta Jaunzeme-Grende". State Chancellery of Latvia. 31 October 2011. Retrieved 30 October 2011.
gollark: Yes, and we will get to watch as it's upheld as somehow *not* being unreasonable.
gollark: Yes, and I don't care, because I think that's a misinterpretation of it.
gollark: ```The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.```This fourth amendment thingy does sound slightly relevant.
gollark: And this *could easily be* and is *already a breach of privacy*.
gollark: Yes, that is also bad.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.