Étienne-Joseph Floquet

Étienne-Joseph Floquet (23 November 1748  10 May 1785) was a French composer, mainly of operas. He was born in Aix-en-Provence and began his career by writing church music, before moving to Paris in 1767.[1] There, Floquet made a name for himself with the requiem he wrote for the funeral of the composer Jean-Joseph de Mondonville in 1772.[2] Floquet's first work for the Paris Opéra, the ballet héroïque L'union de l'amour et les arts, was a triumph, enjoying 60 performances between its premiere in September 1773 and January 1774.[1] The audience at the premiere was so enthusiastic that the performance had to be stopped several times because of the applause and, at the final curtain, Floquet was presented on stage, the first composer in the history of the Paris Opéra to enjoy such an honour.[2] However, the arrival of the German composer Christoph Willibald Gluck in Paris later that year changed French musical taste and Floquet's style became unfashionable. After the failure of his next opera, Azolan, Floquet decided to travel to Italy to perfect his musical education. There he studied composition under Nicola Sala in Naples and counterpoint under Padre Martini in Bologna, where he turned momentarily back to church music composing a Te Deum.[3]

Floquet returned to France in 1777 to find the Parisian public was now split between the supporters of Gluck and the partisans of the Italian Niccolò Piccinni. There was little demand for operas by native French composers and Floquet struggled to have his tragédie lyrique Hellé staged.[1] When it eventually appeared in 1779, it was booed, despite Floquet's attempt to imitate the style of Piccinni, and ran for only three performances.[1][4] Floquet had more success with the lighter Le seigneur bienfaisant and La nouvelle Omphale. He turned to a tragic subject once more when he produced a new musical score for Philippe Quinault's libretto Alceste, originally set by Jean-Baptiste Lully in 1674.[5] Floquet's version was rehearsed but then rejected by the Paris Opéra. The composer was in poor health and the disappointment at his failure to have Alceste staged was said to have contributed to his early death soon afterwards. He left two unfinished operas, one of which, the "fairyland opera" (opéra féerie) Alcindor, was completed by Nicolas Dezède and given its unsuccessful première on 17 April 1787.[6]

Operas

TitleGenreSub­divisionsLibrettoPremière dateTheatreReferences for the information
L'union de l'amour et les artsballet héroïque3 entréesPierre-René Lemonnier7 September 1773Paris OpéraDratwicki, Antoine Dauvergne, p. 297; Rushton in Grove; Pitou, pp. 534–535
Azolan, ou Le serment indiscretopéra-ballet3 entréesLemonnier, based on a story by Voltaire15 November 1774Paris OpéraClément and Larousse Dictionnaire des opéras, p. 73; Pitou, p. 60
Hellétragédie lyrique3 actsLemonnier [7]5 January 1779Paris OpéraPitou, p. 269
Le seigneur bienfaisantopéra3 actsMarc-Antoine-Jacques Rochon de Chabannes14 December 1780Paris OpéraClément and Larousse Dictionnaire des opéras, p. 614; Pitou, pp. 493–494
La nouvelle Omphalecomédie mêlée d'ariettes in prose3 acts"Madame de Beaunoir" (pseudonym of Alexandre L. B. Robineau) [8][9]22 November 1782Premiered at Versailles, transferred to the Théâtre des Italiens, Paris on 28 December 1782Title page of original edition
Grisélidisopéra comique3 actsunperformedRushton in Grove (date of composition: 1783)
Le triomphe d'Alcide (Alceste)tragédie lyrique5 actsJean-Paul-André Razins de Saint-Marc after Philippe Quinault (originally set by Lully, 1674)music written 1783—84; rehearsed 1785 but never performedintended for the Paris OpéraRushton in Grove; Buford Norman, p. 341
Les françaisesopéra comique1 actRochon de ChabannesunperformedRushton in Grove (date of composition uncertain; perhaps 1784)
Alcindor (music finished by Nicolas Dezède)opéra féerie3 actsRochon de Chabannes17 April 1788Paris OpéraRushton in Grove; David J. Buch, Magic Flutes, p. 99; Pitou, pp. 21–22[10]
La chasse (incomplete)Jean-Paul-André Razins de Saint-MarcunperformedRushton in Grove (date of composition: 1785)

Notes and references

  1. Rushton
  2. Dratwicki, Antoine Dauvergne, p. 297
  3. Pitou, p. 226
  4. Dratwicki "Foreigners", p. 61
  5. Entry for Lully's Alceste in the Viking Opera Guide (Viking, 1993), p. 589
  6. Rushton. For information about the premiere of Alcindor (attributed only to Dezède), cf. Pitou, p. 21.
  7. According to Rushton, the libretto had earlier been rejected by Jean-Joseph de Mondonville
  8. According to Clément and Larousse Dictionnaire des opéras, p. 484
  9. For the true identity of "Madame de Beaunoir", see David Charlton Grétry and the Growth of Opéra-Comique, Cambridge University Press, 1986, p. 336
  10. Pitou and Buch attribute the opera to Dezède; Buch has a footnote questioning how much of the music was by Floquet.

Sources

  • David J. Buch, Magic Flutes and Enchanted Forests: The Supernatural in Eighteenth-Century Musical Theater (University of Chicago Press, 2009)
  • (in French) Félix Clément and Pierre Larousse Dictionnaire des opéras (Paris, 1881) Available online at Open Library
  • (in French) Benoît Dratwicki, Antoine Dauvergne (1713—1797): une carrière tourmentée dans la France musicale des Lumières, Editions Mardaga, 2011.
  • Benoît Dratwicki, "Foreigners at the Académie Royale de Musique" in Antonio Sacchini, Renaud, Madrid, Ediciones Singulares, 2013 (book accompanying the complete recording conducted by Christophe Rousset). ISBN 978-84-939-6865-6
  • (in French) Buford Norman Quinault, librettiste de Lully: le poète des grâces, Editions Madraga, 2009.
  • Spire Pitou, The Paris Opéra. An Encyclopedia of Operas, Ballets, Composers, and Performers – Rococo and Romantic, 1715–1815, Westport/London, Greenwood Press, 1985. ISBN 0-313-24394-8
  • Julian Rushton, article "Floquet, Étienne-Joseph" in The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians
gollark: What I'm saying is that reading things and understanding them can be harder than writing them sometimes.
gollark: Yes. It's not unique to Haskell.
gollark: For example, if I was doing Haskell, I could write everything awfully in `IO` and make it very comprehensible to a C user, or I could write it in some crazy pointfree way which I don't understand 5 seconds after writing it.
gollark: e.g. you probably wouldn't just go for C, if you wanted to avoid being caught.
gollark: You can't infer much from language choice as people will obviously try and spoof that.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.