Do newer Mobo's do RAID in a way that allows the disks to be viewed as a normal non-RAID HDD if transferred to another computer?

I built a new PC this weekend, and one of the joys I had was to transfer my RAID 1 array to the new system with a different mobo. The disks were not recognized at all, by either the mobo (no surprise) or Windows XP.

Now with the disks running on the new system, out of curiosity I switched the BIOS from "RAID" to "AHCI" and booted into Windows. Much to my surprise, Computer Management showed the two HDDs as separate drives partitioned into 279 GB and 84 MB, and both as being healthy NTFS formatted disks. Neither were assigned a letter or mounted, and I didn't mount them because I didn't want to screw anything up.

So my question is... is it possible that RAID 1 support on my new motherboard is formatting the primary partition on each HDD in a stock standard way, and storing any RAID specific data in the separate small partition? Can anyone say with any certainty?

Mobo hardware is an MSI 790GX-G65, which is an AMD SB750 RAID chipset.

PS: This matters to me because I was planning on upgrading to Windows 7 and switching to software RAID to avoid problems with loosing my data if my mobo fails and my backups are not completely up to date.

raid-1

Lawrence Dol

Posted 2010-01-19T05:57:17.417

Reputation: 1 946

1I think, I will rebuild my old system with a spare HDD I have lying around, and once I have it up, pull one of the RAID drives and see what it looks like in the old system. – Lawrence Dol – 2010-01-19T09:44:58.767

Answers

is it possible that RAID 1 support on my new motherboard is formatting the primary partition on each HDD in a stock standard way, and storing any RAID specific data in the separate small partition?

For RAID1, yes.

ta.speot.is

Posted 2010-01-19T05:57:17.417

Reputation: 13 727

This worked for me on my Dell XPS motherboard but not on my old no-name SATA RAID card. – Chris Nava – 2010-02-18T19:00:11.173

It depends on the RAID implementation, which is not universal across all motherboards (or even within the same manufacturer). Today, I tried with an Intel RST RAID 1 array on a P67 chipset. I rebuilt the array on new drives (one at a time), then reconnected the old drives. One was recognised as a former array member, and the other as one disk of a two-disk array with the other disk missing. On deleting the secondary array (and releasing the former array member from RAID) through the RST control panel, I could mark the disks as online in Windows' Disk Management and view the data. – Bob – 2012-11-26T05:58:35.820

On a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being most sure, how sure are you of this? – Lawrence Dol – 2010-01-19T06:51:44.423

I'm just saying it's possible. I have seen this twice in the wild. – ta.speot.is – 2010-01-19T06:57:28.480

It's very common for this to be the case with RAID 1, I can only think of one time where I've seen it not work. – phoebus – 2010-01-19T07:05:04.050

When I transferred my array to the new system last weekend, it showed both disks as type "unknown". I had to format and rebuild them - but that was coming from a 3-5 year old mobo. My new mobo was released Jan 2009. – Lawrence Dol – 2010-01-20T04:46:07.333

I've always been told if you want compatibility or portability between systems or OSs, you need an external RAID card. The RAID cards are easier to replace or easier to find compatible chip sets.

Scott McClenning

Posted 2010-01-19T05:57:17.417

Reputation: 3 519

nope. software raid for portability; with hardware raid you have to match chipsets. the advantage for add-on hardware raid cards is that a) if the motherboard dies, you can migrate the card with the drives; b) if the card dies, you stand a chance of getting another card with the same chipset (& firmware) for array recovery; and c) assuming you spend enough, you might get a real hardware raid chipset instead of the not-really-hardware-raid chipsets they tend to integrate into consumer motherboards. – quack quixote – 2010-01-19T06:53:09.507